Good call, Magpie. The OP suffers from serious mental health issues. Please dont' blame her.
here's a more current site than the old one with bad information that shows that Ron Paul finds it "shocking that the American people are prohibited from knowing the whole truth about 9/11". It's from a website that hates us so you know they're quoting him very very carefully to say he's a nut.
John Birch Society only pretends to be against our greatest enemy.
The fact that they're tied in with Alex Jones is relevant to the Q movement and you know why.
Paul was running for president that term and had to deny it because it would have killed his run.
AHEM...
The Ron Paul supporters are also using a type of crazy logic to support him. They believe that Ron Paul is avoiding 9/11 because he doesn't want to upset people, and that after he becomes president he'll become honest. According to this reasoning, people in Congress are under pressure to lie to us, but the president is protected from this influence. I suppose this explains why George Bush is so honest.
This Ron Paul logic could be used with Hillary Clinton and John McCain. Perhaps both of them will become honest if they become president.
Parents could use the Ron Paul logic when they discover that their daughter wants to marry an alcoholic. They could convince themselves that after he gets married he'll quit drinking.
We could define the Ron Paul logic as "helping a criminal to achieve his goal in the hope that he becomes free of whatever was pressuring him to be a criminal."
She doesn't really get how books and articles and stuff work. She thinks if you write it in the encylopedia in 1885 then it's all still true in the encyclopedia in 2021.
She's a good person, she just has a lot of serious issues. Don't be too hard on her. Just imagine how it is for her husband and kids!
Also, 13 years ago this guy was trying to convince us that Natalee Holloway was a trafficked sex slave which is totally false, as we now know she was murdered by serial killer Joran Van Der Sloot.
Soooooo....maybe this ain't a real good example of information that doesn't change over thirteen years. hahaha
Poor baby. Joran Van Der Sloot was convicted in 2012 of killing a woman in Lima, Peru in 2010.
Because circumstantial evidence (which is perfectly valid evidence) AND his confessed criminal behavior point to his being NH's killer, he is widely considered to have killed her.
A minute ago he was somebody you knew nothing about and now you're literally defending a serial killer instead of agreeing to use the techniques that grade- school children know how to use in selecting sources.
Verify your sources, anon. Research carefully. Stop defending serial killers because you think it makes you (somehow?) look good. Things like this are earning you a very bad reputation on GA.
She doesn't understand that she's using some rando's ancient website to make her point. The site is riddled with old info. But she's desperate to find a shred of proof to say that Ron Paul is bad. It's kind of a Paul Man Bad syndrome that she has.
Ron Paul has clearly and consistently, for many years, stated that 9/11 truth is hidden by the government.
I know the OP, and she's a good lady sometimes, but she has serious mental health problems and doesn't really understand how all this works and what we do here.
Natalee Holloway wasn't sex trafficked. She was killed by serial killer Joran Van Der Sloot. He only said she was trafficked as one of many false stories he gave to try to cover his @$$.
Do you not understand why it's good to use up-to-date sources that are accurate? You're making researching anons look bad.
Update December 2008:
Joran van der Sloot changes his story again. This time he claims what I suggested in my audio file; namely, that she was sold as a sex slave.
Have you ever considered how significant the "Ron Paul Revolution" is? He raised millions of dollars and acquired a tremendous amount of voter support without any favorable publicity by the media.
Imagine if you had announced on the Internet that you were running for president, and imagine yourself receiving millions of dollars. And imagine that you had attracted hundreds of thousands of people who were aware of 9/11 and fed up with the corruption, the Federal Reserve, and Zionism. What sort of presidential campaign would you set up for yourself? Would you avoid the issue of 9/11? Or would you work with your supporters to help spread information about 9/11 and Zionism in order to educate more people and get more supporters?
Ron Paul isn't taking advantage of the wonderful situation he's in. Some people assume he's being cautious, but it's more likely that he is working for a faction within the Zionist network that is competing with other factions for control of America.
Ron Paul has never shown any interest in exposing Zionism. He is willing to complain about the Iraq war, but he never mentions that Israel set up the 9/11 attack to start the war. Instead, he merely describes the war is a mistake.
He is willing to complain about the Federal Reserve and the income tax, but he never suggests that we arrest the Rothschilds or the other banking families for the horrendous crimes they've been involved with. Instead, he suggests we allow competing currencies.
It's also possible that Ron Paul's true goal is even more diabolical. It's possible that he has no intention of becoming president. It's possible that he's just another Pied Piper to pacify the people who are angry about the war, the Federal Reserve system, and 9/11. In this scenario, Ron Paul was told to take their money, and encourage them to calm down and do nothing.
Oooooh, SNAP! Everybody on your thread getting more upvotes than the OP. Not a good sign, gurl! I don't think this post is gonna hit the top of the "Hot" posts list! XD
Good call, Magpie. The OP suffers from serious mental health issues. Please dont' blame her.
here's a more current site than the old one with bad information that shows that Ron Paul finds it "shocking that the American people are prohibited from knowing the whole truth about 9/11". It's from a website that hates us so you know they're quoting him very very carefully to say he's a nut.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/ron-paul-dons-911-truther-tin-foil
John Birch Society only pretends to be against our greatest enemy.
The fact that they're tied in with Alex Jones is relevant to the Q movement and you know why.
AHEM...
The Ron Paul supporters are also using a type of crazy logic to support him. They believe that Ron Paul is avoiding 9/11 because he doesn't want to upset people, and that after he becomes president he'll become honest. According to this reasoning, people in Congress are under pressure to lie to us, but the president is protected from this influence. I suppose this explains why George Bush is so honest.
This Ron Paul logic could be used with Hillary Clinton and John McCain. Perhaps both of them will become honest if they become president.
Parents could use the Ron Paul logic when they discover that their daughter wants to marry an alcoholic. They could convince themselves that after he gets married he'll quit drinking.
We could define the Ron Paul logic as "helping a criminal to achieve his goal in the hope that he becomes free of whatever was pressuring him to be a criminal."
Excellent and thorough diatribe.
That dodged every single counter-argument that page had to offer.
Naming Globalism and not Zionism is literally the trick and what that page talks about. Go figure, huh?
Like Alex Jones and 9/11 truth? K thanks.
She doesn't really get how books and articles and stuff work. She thinks if you write it in the encylopedia in 1885 then it's all still true in the encyclopedia in 2021.
She's a good person, she just has a lot of serious issues. Don't be too hard on her. Just imagine how it is for her husband and kids!
Does the truth change because it's been 13 years or something?
Also, 13 years ago this guy was trying to convince us that Natalee Holloway was a trafficked sex slave which is totally false, as we now know she was murdered by serial killer Joran Van Der Sloot.
Soooooo....maybe this ain't a real good example of information that doesn't change over thirteen years. hahaha
Was he convicted for the murder?
Of course. He was convicted in 2012 of the 2010 murder of a woman in Lima, Peru. He is currently imprisoned there.
No he wasn't. He is the primary suspect. Never convicted. You're full of shit.
Poor baby. Joran Van Der Sloot was convicted in 2012 of killing a woman in Lima, Peru in 2010.
Because circumstantial evidence (which is perfectly valid evidence) AND his confessed criminal behavior point to his being NH's killer, he is widely considered to have killed her.
A minute ago he was somebody you knew nothing about and now you're literally defending a serial killer instead of agreeing to use the techniques that grade- school children know how to use in selecting sources.
Verify your sources, anon. Research carefully. Stop defending serial killers because you think it makes you (somehow?) look good. Things like this are earning you a very bad reputation on GA.
Did you just list subjective examples when I said TRUTH which is objective?
Facts don't change over time. Facts are facts.
How many history books do you get this upset about? "Well it was written 40 years ago!"
Do you refuse to read encyclopedias, too?
What about...the Bible?
She doesn't understand that she's using some rando's ancient website to make her point. The site is riddled with old info. But she's desperate to find a shred of proof to say that Ron Paul is bad. It's kind of a Paul Man Bad syndrome that she has.
Ron Paul has clearly and consistently, for many years, stated that 9/11 truth is hidden by the government.
I know the OP, and she's a good lady sometimes, but she has serious mental health problems and doesn't really understand how all this works and what we do here.
Wake me up when he's naming Zionists.
Uhhh...the article you posted has things in it that are totally wrong. This guy is right. You need to keep up to date on your sources, ma'am.
Like?
Dang it, woman. Aren't you literate?
Natalee Holloway wasn't sex trafficked. She was killed by serial killer Joran Van Der Sloot. He only said she was trafficked as one of many false stories he gave to try to cover his @$$.
Do you not understand why it's good to use up-to-date sources that are accurate? You're making researching anons look bad.
The website doesn't say she WAS sex trafficked.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disappearance_of_Natalee_Holloway
Prove it.
That guy responding to you is trying to help you out and you are arguing with him.
LIIIIIKE?
What is Ron Paul's true goal?
Have you ever considered how significant the "Ron Paul Revolution" is? He raised millions of dollars and acquired a tremendous amount of voter support without any favorable publicity by the media.
Imagine if you had announced on the Internet that you were running for president, and imagine yourself receiving millions of dollars. And imagine that you had attracted hundreds of thousands of people who were aware of 9/11 and fed up with the corruption, the Federal Reserve, and Zionism. What sort of presidential campaign would you set up for yourself? Would you avoid the issue of 9/11? Or would you work with your supporters to help spread information about 9/11 and Zionism in order to educate more people and get more supporters?
Ron Paul isn't taking advantage of the wonderful situation he's in. Some people assume he's being cautious, but it's more likely that he is working for a faction within the Zionist network that is competing with other factions for control of America.
Ron Paul has never shown any interest in exposing Zionism. He is willing to complain about the Iraq war, but he never mentions that Israel set up the 9/11 attack to start the war. Instead, he merely describes the war is a mistake.
He is willing to complain about the Federal Reserve and the income tax, but he never suggests that we arrest the Rothschilds or the other banking families for the horrendous crimes they've been involved with. Instead, he suggests we allow competing currencies.
It's also possible that Ron Paul's true goal is even more diabolical. It's possible that he has no intention of becoming president. It's possible that he's just another Pied Piper to pacify the people who are angry about the war, the Federal Reserve system, and 9/11. In this scenario, Ron Paul was told to take their money, and encourage them to calm down and do nothing.
9/11 Disinformation and The John Birch Society - http://hugequestions.com/Eric/TFC/Bollyn-JBS.html
Oooooh, SNAP! Everybody on your thread getting more upvotes than the OP. Not a good sign, gurl! I don't think this post is gonna hit the top of the "Hot" posts list! XD
Honey, 7 is not more than 11.
Whoa. You just typed the only factual information I've ever seen from you!
You're on a roll, baby girl! Luh ya!
Coming from a liar, that doesn't mean much.
God, your filthy mouth drives me wild...
Using Gods name as a curse word and denying the objective truth of the Bible?
I smell a Bolshevik.
Tell me I'm your dirty little Stallnist boy, daddy. I want you to spank me with the Good Book and turn my lil @$$ Soviet red....
I'll pray for your soul.