posted ago by TheRoyalRob ago by TheRoyalRob +85 / -0

30 people.

That is 0.002%

This is the real numbers of COVID, they can't fudge these numbers because it would be too easy to track. This might be common knowledge, I just thought it was very telling.

Sauce: https://www.military.com/daily-news/2020/03/16/militarys-coronavirus-cases-latest-rundown.html

Comments (10)
sorted by:
Lapstrake 10 points ago +10 / -0

Finally we get some numbers about the Wuhan virus that isn't from the CDC. Thanks for posting this!

Not sure where you are getting the number 30 from.

personnel have died: 26 troops, 14 dependents, 235 civilians and 80 contractors.

As of June 25, officials said there have now been 302,685 total cases of COVID-19, also known as the novel coronavirus

ok, I think the 'number of cases' number is always useless since I think especially among the young who have very minor symptoms they never even knew they had it.

But let's us that number anyway. Let's look at deaths vs. 'number of cases'

Deaths: 26 + 14 + 235 + 80 = 355

So of the 302,685 cases how many died as a percentage?

355 / 302,685 = 0.00117 = 0.117%

So what is the survival rate if you catch the virus?


And I think the number of cases is way underestimated. I think the virus flooded across the country infecting all the easy targets before anybody knew. Myself included.


New York antibody tests: 2.7 million possibly infected with coronavirus statewide Updated Apr 23, 2020; Posted Apr 23, 2020


What is the population of NYS? 19.5 million

So 14% of the population had already been infected and recovered from the Wuhan virus in April of 2020. Before the lockdowns. The virus was already everywhere. There was no 'stopping the spread' it was all bullshit.

TheRoyalRob [S] 3 points ago +4 / -1

I meant more so the troops, I didn't count contractors and civilians. I just thought it was such a small number, it seemed about right.

My brother is in the navy and he knows people who had covid... all who said the shot was MUCH worse then covid actually was.

Fringe--dweller 4 points ago +4 / -0



  1. a fictitious prose narrative of book length, typically representing character and action with some degree of realism

Example: "the novels of Jane Austen"

Words matter Novel Corona-virus used as a signal to insiders that it's all bullshit.

Lapstrake 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes, the number is tiny, especially among the troops who have a younger average age than if you include all the contractors etc. And I think you made a great point about it being numbers they can't fudge because it would be discovered.

For civilians it was not a good thing that the CDC is the gatekeeper for all the information. I feel like they spend most of their time doing exactly that - figuring out how they can fudge the numbers.

inquimous 1 point ago +1 / -0

Because if they had had covid and then the shot, they were exhibiting antibody dependent enhancement (ADE) reactions.

wideawakeuk 2 points ago +2 / -0

I should think if they use the same methods as the UK as far as testing is concerned these people (or many of them) could have died with corona not from it. The majority of people in UK hospitals at the moment were in hospital already for something else before being tested- up to 3 weeks after admission. Loads of heart attacks and strokes being lumped in with covid deaths if they test positive.

Dogsoldier2 1 point ago +2 / -1

Sounds good except for one inescapable factor, entropy.

The science fiction writer Isaac Asimov's 1956 short story "The Last Question" deals with entropy in a unique way. It's also a fun read.

The Last Question by Isaac Asimov

inquimous 1 point ago +1 / -0

As suspected, there are going to be a lot of agencies collecting more honest numbers if we could only get past the CDC.

Shockadee 1 point ago +1 / -0

I assume this doesn't include deployed troops. From what I understand those on mission are taking HCQ anyways, so they don't get sick in combat.

deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0