"i've been high up enough to see curvature, i don't care what youtube or rappers or anyone says about FE i personally know it's fucking retarded."
What in a plane? Who hasn't! Plane windows are convex though aren't they? It may very well be retarded (and I would have once dismissed it as such) but I'm not making the point others are and they make some good points. Is it true for instance that pilots do not account for the curvature of the earth in flight training?
Or engineers when they do their calculations do not include it? I'm curious why would that be? I'm also curious why NASA would have declassified docs that showed they were designing planes for a flat plane. Why would they waste money on such a foolish thing?
"as to this theory about old buildings being used for hydro-electric just please understand that the farther back into history you go the closer mankind lived to it's sources of water. all old civilizations, with very rare exceptions, all lived within a few miles of running water. old cities were built on the shores and the banks of water not to produce electricity... but because thats where all the people were."
We aren't talking that far back in history we are talking a few centuries ago and major highly populated cities even in countries that can barely manage electricity today. I'm well aware of water mills, I'm talking about stately homes and churches and castles especially in Europe that may have been electro-magnetic power generators.
Perhaps watch the video and then comment on the points he made? But I suspect you won't because you already know 'it's fucking retarded'.
The last time I was in a plane they used very thick glass and it had slight convex bowing at the sides. Maybe in the last few years they are using flatter glass but they never used to
People who have gone extremely high in hot air ballons never claim they see the curve of the horizon BTW. Quite the contrary.
Besides which, the point of the documentary I was showing, the flat earth thing was an incidental. The hydro electric buildings I was talking about were places like St Basil's cathedral in Moscow, Westminster Abbey etc. The photos he was showing from around the 1830's showed the streets as empty in these huge cities (bit like the photos of the cities recently when were under the first lockdowns). They were also far too big for the claimed populations at that time.
The riddle of these great buildings contrasting with poor roads,no power tools and people still riding around in horses and carts. Then later people started appearing in the streets around 20 years later. The people do not fit the buildings if that makes sense. Never occurred to me before but he's kind of got a point. He may be wrong, but it is a question worth pondering.
The narrator was speculating that the people who built those buildings were not the same as we credit (ie we didn't build them), there was some kind of reset around the early 1800s and history got rewritten. We never question it. I certainly didn't. The great gardens in the Stately Homes of England were designed and built by Capability Brown as far as I knew. I know that because history books told me. But what if that was a lie? If they depopulated and re-purposed everything and changed the historical timeline how would we know??
He goes on to show how these weren't the homes of the Aristocrats, that is the 'new' history, they were originally what powered the country. Same in other countries. The mudslides which are revealing that these buildings are more than they appear. Same with the great Cathedrals. They may have been also used as Churches but they were built as power generators using electro-magnetism, sound and water to produce power. And it obviously wasn't us who used them for that.
The FE aspect is woven into this, but it is not the main aspect of the series (wish he'd called it something else - Lost History of Earth maybe) but by that time when you consider all the oddities it is likely you no longer will dismiss the idea of FE when you understand the enormity of what they may be lying about.
Could it be true? I don't know, but I am no longer gonna just dismiss it because it sounds retarded. If everything may be a lie that means EVERYTHING is up for reconsideration even if you think it's retarded.
He raises some very good questions and if they are trying to do a reset again well we don't have much time to figure it out.
"i've been high up enough to see curvature, i don't care what youtube or rappers or anyone says about FE i personally know it's fucking retarded."
What in a plane? Who hasn't! Plane windows are convex though aren't they? It may very well be retarded (and I would have once dismissed it as such) but I'm not making the point others are and they make some good points. Is it true for instance that pilots do not account for the curvature of the earth in flight training?
Or engineers when they do their calculations do not include it? I'm curious why would that be? I'm also curious why NASA would have declassified docs that showed they were designing planes for a flat plane. Why would they waste money on such a foolish thing?
"as to this theory about old buildings being used for hydro-electric just please understand that the farther back into history you go the closer mankind lived to it's sources of water. all old civilizations, with very rare exceptions, all lived within a few miles of running water. old cities were built on the shores and the banks of water not to produce electricity... but because thats where all the people were."
We aren't talking that far back in history we are talking a few centuries ago and major highly populated cities even in countries that can barely manage electricity today. I'm well aware of water mills, I'm talking about stately homes and churches and castles especially in Europe that may have been electro-magnetic power generators.
Perhaps watch the video and then comment on the points he made? But I suspect you won't because you already know 'it's fucking retarded'.
The last time I was in a plane they used very thick glass and it had slight convex bowing at the sides. Maybe in the last few years they are using flatter glass but they never used to
People who have gone extremely high in hot air ballons never claim they see the curve of the horizon BTW. Quite the contrary.
Besides which, the point of the documentary I was showing, the flat earth thing was an incidental. The hydro electric buildings I was talking about were places like St Basil's cathedral in Moscow, Westminster Abbey etc. The photos he was showing from around the 1830's showed the streets as empty in these huge cities (bit like the photos of the cities recently when were under the first lockdowns). They were also far too big for the claimed populations at that time.
The riddle of these great buildings contrasting with poor roads,no power tools and people still riding around in horses and carts. Then later people started appearing in the streets around 20 years later. The people do not fit the buildings if that makes sense. Never occurred to me before but he's kind of got a point. He may be wrong, but it is a question worth pondering.
The narrator was speculating that the people who built those buildings were not the same as we credit (ie we didn't build them), there was some kind of reset around the early 1800s and history got rewritten. We never question it. I certainly didn't. The great gardens in the Stately Homes of England were designed and built by Capability Brown as far as I knew. I know that because history books told me. But what if that was a lie? If they depopulated and re-purposed everything and changed the historical timeline how would we know??
He goes on to show how these weren't the homes of the Aristocrats, that is the 'new' history, they were originally what powered the country. Same in other countries. The mudslides which are revealing that these buildings are more than they appear. Same with the great Cathedrals. They may have been also used as Churches but they were built as power generators using electro-magnetism, sound and water to produce power. And it obviously wasn't us who used them for that.
The FE aspect is woven into this, but it is not the main aspect of the series (wish he'd called it something else - Lost History of Earth maybe) but by that time when you consider all the oddities it is likely you no longer will dismiss the idea of FE when you understand the enormity of what they may be lying about.
Could it be true? I don't know, but I am no longer gonna just dismiss it because it sounds retarded. If everything may be a lie that means EVERYTHING is up for reconsideration even if you think it's retarded.
He raises some very good questions and if they are trying to do a reset again well we don't have much time to figure it out.