Restoration of the original constitution - I tend to be cynical when it comes to these matters but if we have the numbers I dont see why it couldnt happen.
(friendsoftheoriginalconstitution.org)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (17)
sorted by:
I think it is a very sympathetic and worthy adventure ......
I don't think it will fly, though.
500 Trillion dollars meaning: 500 trillion FRN? Come one! FRN is an IOU (see: Money Markets written by Stigum) and the FED is a central planning institution par excellance (chapter 1).
In the list of defendants, I am missing the States Conference. See Book of the States. This conference was setup in 1935. Another commie FDR and unconstitutional invention, and any other institution.
However, I would say: a constitutional convention should to be taking place, because the current situation does not convey any authorization to any public official. The US inc is defacto dissolved, and the original framers are not around to renew authorization. The C is not in operation.
So, first, New States have to be authorized. From then on a new Compact should be made to create the new Federal Government.
In effect, the document created by Friendsoftheoriginalconstitution, has just dropped a new Declaration of Independence. Revocation of consent and signatures. I think that is a good thing.
Another thing to consider is:
The original Constitition of the United States was ratified in 1791 or so. This came about because the US could not pay the debt cause by the Revolutionary war of 1776.
For instance: Louis of France had lent the US 3 million dollars worth of money. Where do you think he obtained these funds? My guess: Rothschild of France. (further research needed)
The Peace treaty of Paris, preliminary deal in 1782, final document in 1789, stipulated that its coming into effect was dependent on debt resolution. And then Louis was beheaded.
So, who ended up as a creditor to that debt? The English crown? Can you say Rothschild France sold the debt to Rothschild of London, to bring the US under articles of confederation into receivership, needing a stronger federal government, causing the Constitution?
Another, coincidence has to do with the Dutch Republic. This Republic declared it's independence in 1581. And until 1789, fought 4 wars with the English.
In 1780, the 4th was declared, and you know why? Because the Dutch were aiding and abetting the Revolutionary War. The first vessel arriving in St Marten, then a Dutch Possession overseas, was gun saluted at it's arrival in the harbor. That is a defacto recognition of a new State.
That war of 1780 totally eradicated any possessions oversees in Dutch hands, making the country jump from power level flea in the skin to non-existent. The internal consequences were that the country dived into recession, causing huge upheaval, and the Oranges, as stadhouders conducting the war, fled. To where? London of course.
London you say? But they just fought a war? Yes. Family relations.
And in one stroke of Genius, two independent Free Republics were brought to heel.
Q said: follow the money. And although it is suspected that Benjamin Franklin's role in all of this is smelly, no one so far has considered the financial angle within geopolitical rational.
Consider also that the post Napoleonic security system that was put into place was basically an all of government approach:
To curb any revolutionary spirit! (See: Fighting Terror Post Napoleon written by Beatrice de Graaf)
Why would you think a return to the gold standard is a good thing? Or should we go back to a silver standard where the Dollar is defined as a weight in Silver. (Note: NOT VALUE but WEIGHT!) and pegged to gold in a 1:15 ratio (1:16 was a peg that was needed to accommodate further stealing from the people)
see: Coin's financial school by : W: F: Harvey. (This way of writing is not originated by Russel-Jay Gould. This is what is shown to be the name of the author early 1900)
And how do you return to Constitutional money if trillions of FRN end up in the hands of the people, chasing the same goods and services? Inflation? How do you return to Constitutional money?
With all of this in mind, I am very sympathetic towards the effort, and it can be used to have people investigate and research their actual station. It will not fly in this manner, though. The forces against are such, that the process itself may be conducted, but within no time, the New Republic would be bankrupted.
First things first. And I would submit, that convention will come, because dejure it is required. Yet, first, you need to have your ducks in a row. Enter Trump and MAGA.
OR
Step out of the fiction by obtaining a claim-of-the-live, and let stop and correct do it's work. Because within this fiction world, there is no salvaging.
Thanks for the information and references. Ive added them to my reading list. Have you obtained a claim of life? If so have you done this on your own or through the quantum community?
Through the chief.
I guess you could do it on your own, but you would have to have a flag and international recognition to derive any value from that.
You've got to be on guard, though. There are some who have ran with the system. As far as I understand it, anyone can start a postal union. But it does not mean they are correct. After careful consideration, I went with the real deal, instead of the copy pasta "Chinese" knockoff's.
Then there is Anna von Reiz, who does her best to discount this whole LLC. Learned a lot from her. Her arguments on its face are very good, but after studying it, she misses the mark. Russel and Anna have talked but she could not get it. And Anna has no flag.
So, you really need to make sure you get the real stuff. And with Russel you get that.
Another observation:
In the Bounty-Seekers video he has put this guy on the list:
He is the main director of the UPU. So maybe, the message about confirmation of direction may not be primarily for us, per sé, but maybe for those in the offices and halls of all these UN globalist agencies.
I also note these guys wanted on bounty, have all their names written as : Bishar-Abdirahman: Hussein., indicating they may have a Claim-of-the-Life. Which means, Slick Willie and Hillaryous would also have one. It would not be a stretch since : David-Wynn: Miller helped Slick Willy with his Lewinsky affair. And David had Kamala Harris under his wings for a few years.
Given the business Russel conducted in the Vatican, it does not surprise me that : Jorge-Mario: Bergoglio. also seems to have one. There may be much more. It reminds me of Q's remark about housecleaning. Also the timing of this: August is traditionally hot.
Again, this is my inference from the video. Because those without a LLC would have their names in CAPITALS, as corporate fictions. And Russel is precise and correct.
And, I am NOT, again NOT saying Russel is Q, by implication or otherwise. He is NOT Q. He said so himself. But given the level access Q has, and the fact Russel has access given his position, it would not be surprising if this is taken into account.
I just came up with this thought, so I will have to reread the Q posts with that in mind.
added: I watched the video again and it seems these people do not have a claim of the live and their names are written as corporate vessels, so indeed in : FN-SN: LN type. No thinking ability. however, the pictures are strangely cropped. That may be because of his word to pdf converter or something. Another possibility is, I would suppose, that some of them may have had a claim of the live, perhaps even obtained through David, during the period he had no authorization to do so, due to a joinder he had with certain people. That would mean voidance of the contract.
Waiting and seeing.
You really have done your research and I have just scratched the surface. Out of curiosity, have you used the claim of life to change your life....as in contracts or dealing with the courts?
Processing.
Not every country is like the US. And a lot has been dug up in these last 20 years pertaining to how things work in the US.
There is slight but important differences in various jurisdictions. And these need to be understood, in terms of being with the knowledge, before effectively things can be done.
On an interaction basis, and as part of the reprogramming, it is easy to work from a position of neutrality and Postmaster.
How far are you along?