Yup. Something is very stinky about his actually encouraging or inciting a protest that could potentially get Patriots arrested. That is how you end up in re-indoctrination camp or unvaxxxed prison camp. We should stay calm, stay off the streets & refrain from protesting for now. Stay close to your pew pews.
Because he voted to certify the election. Because he voted against Trump's border wall funding, BUT he voted twice for an increase in military spending by billions of dollars during the OBAMA administration. He is a libertarian when it suits him.
Even if he did initially think the election was legit there is no excuse for continuing to believe so. He also has not said a word about the political prisoners from January 6th. I have told him several times that the only way I will vote for him next year is if he calls for McConnell's resignation from GOP leadership on the Senate floor.
Stop thinking people are shills/psyops/rinos/[whatever name to infer someone should be discounted]
Just because they don't share 100% of your views. And be open for people on the cusp to change.
If he is speaking against medical tyranny with the current occupation FINE. GOOD.
If devolution is real then rand's previous vote doesn't matter. If Devolution is not true then his vote jan 6 also does not matter since the DS is in control and we need him to fight their current power grab.
Personally, I prioritize my ire for those working for the promotion of communism. Not on pedes that aren't fully awake or just have medium sized balls rather than bug balls.
Also, are you mad at trump for being on the vax train "still"? To me, that is a way bigger issue then a vote than a single vote when the fix was in regardless of who did/not vote to decertify. Not for one second was that going to happen.
Calling people out for "handshake" is nothing but an ad hominem attack. You aren't really addressing the argument itself.
There is evidence that he has put his life on the line for his beliefs. Is that evidence real? I have no idea, but it does exist. Am I suspicious of Rand Paul? Yes, but I am suspicious of everyone. There are reasons to suspect him, and you have given one reasonable argument of evidence for possible "controlled opposition":
Great Ideas. Massive constituency. Zero legislative wins.
Everything else you said was pure speculation: "DS thinks..." -- speculative. "Rand Paul glows" -- no direct evidential support and only a little circumstantial evidence exists to support this statement.
The jury is still out on Rand Paul or the Paul family in general. There is substantial arguments in support of RP, and some decent evidence against, but nothing that meets the standard of "preponderance of the evidence" that I have seen. If you have more actual evidence (logic or facts, not assumptions or speculations), please present it.
Regardless of RP, I would ask you to attack an argument, not the presenter of it (this is not directed specifically at you, but at everyone, because this is all too common and a part of our Illuminati training). Focusing on the presenter, and not the presentation never serves to find the truth, and only ever serves to keep it hidden by shutting down an argument without addressing it.
Not every good guy has to be in Trumps army. There can be genuinely good politicians. Perhaps he didn’t see a reason to not certify the election. Doesn’t mean he is deep state..
A human can not function trusting 0% if 100% of the people.
Who is talking about blind trust.
This has NOTHING to do with trust.
The only thing that is testable are actions.
Trust is subjective and ideal in terms if politics but it is completely unverifiable when we don't even know any of these people (including trump).
"Paul is Deep State" sounds, to me, a lot like "Q is a Deep State program to keep us from doing anything while we wait for The Plan to fix things" -- an idea that can sound almost-plausible when you consider only a few details but which makes no sense in the larger picture.
Both Q and the Pauls -- Rand and his father Ron -- have hugely grown the freedom movement, have red-pilled millions, are hated and opposed by the establishment, and have, in my opinion, done more for the cause of liberty than, well, any person or group other than Donald Trump himself. Like Trump, Paul is neither a perfect Constitutionalist nor a perfect libertarian, but if I couldn't accept, appreciate, and endorse pro-MAGA individuals who think slightly differently from me, I don't know what I'd do.
Rand's relentless public exposure of Fauci and his recent criminal referral of Fauci to the Justice Department for lying to Congress are examples of why I support him. [No, I don't expect today's Justice Dept to do anything to Fauci]. Red-pilling the masses about the Cabal, the scamdemic, systemic corruption, and the fact that those we're told are working FOR us are mostly working AGAINST us is absolutely critical -- and Paul is good at it.
What he means is they can't arrest all of us by pure numbers
Essentially acknowledging that they will arrest some whether it's legal or not.
Yup. Something is very stinky about his actually encouraging or inciting a protest that could potentially get Patriots arrested. That is how you end up in re-indoctrination camp or unvaxxxed prison camp. We should stay calm, stay off the streets & refrain from protesting for now. Stay close to your pew pews.
I trust him. Not sure why he gets as much shit as he does.
Because he voted to certify the election. Because he voted against Trump's border wall funding, BUT he voted twice for an increase in military spending by billions of dollars during the OBAMA administration. He is a libertarian when it suits him.
Don't expect every patriot to think and do a you would.
Maybe he did think the election was legit.
Maybe he is in the game and had to play the part in order to be ready for another battle.
Maybe his focus (as a doctor) is more on health.
...as long as he is fighting against the ccp in ANYWAY i'll take it.
Perfection is the enemy of done good.
Even if he did initially think the election was legit there is no excuse for continuing to believe so. He also has not said a word about the political prisoners from January 6th. I have told him several times that the only way I will vote for him next year is if he calls for McConnell's resignation from GOP leadership on the Senate floor.
That's cool. My point is-
Stop thinking people are shills/psyops/rinos/[whatever name to infer someone should be discounted]
Just because they don't share 100% of your views. And be open for people on the cusp to change.
If he is speaking against medical tyranny with the current occupation FINE. GOOD. If devolution is real then rand's previous vote doesn't matter. If Devolution is not true then his vote jan 6 also does not matter since the DS is in control and we need him to fight their current power grab.
Personally, I prioritize my ire for those working for the promotion of communism. Not on pedes that aren't fully awake or just have medium sized balls rather than bug balls.
Also, are you mad at trump for being on the vax train "still"? To me, that is a way bigger issue then a vote than a single vote when the fix was in regardless of who did/not vote to decertify. Not for one second was that going to happen.
The closer they fly to the sun, the harder they glow
Rand Paul glows. Always has. DS thinks they can send ONE GUY to represent the tens of millions that are Libertarians and Independents?
This has always been the trick with the Paul family.
Great Ideas. Massive constituency. Zero legislative wins.
and this is your first comment, handshake boy ?
the logic is clear in the comment and you zipping in from the dark corners of the internet to call me 'deranged' is very telling.
maybe it's you that is deranged, faggot.
Calling people out for "handshake" is nothing but an ad hominem attack. You aren't really addressing the argument itself.
There is evidence that he has put his life on the line for his beliefs. Is that evidence real? I have no idea, but it does exist. Am I suspicious of Rand Paul? Yes, but I am suspicious of everyone. There are reasons to suspect him, and you have given one reasonable argument of evidence for possible "controlled opposition":
Everything else you said was pure speculation: "DS thinks..." -- speculative. "Rand Paul glows" -- no direct evidential support and only a little circumstantial evidence exists to support this statement.
The jury is still out on Rand Paul or the Paul family in general. There is substantial arguments in support of RP, and some decent evidence against, but nothing that meets the standard of "preponderance of the evidence" that I have seen. If you have more actual evidence (logic or facts, not assumptions or speculations), please present it.
Regardless of RP, I would ask you to attack an argument, not the presenter of it (this is not directed specifically at you, but at everyone, because this is all too common and a part of our Illuminati training). Focusing on the presenter, and not the presentation never serves to find the truth, and only ever serves to keep it hidden by shutting down an argument without addressing it.
Not every good guy has to be in Trumps army. There can be genuinely good politicians. Perhaps he didn’t see a reason to not certify the election. Doesn’t mean he is deep state..
That's a silly reason to not trust him. You are incorrect..
They "can" absolutely arrest us. We are in a lawless time. How do you not get that. People are rightfully and wrongly arrested all the time.
lol trust NOBODY
WTF would you blindly trust anyone in Congress, seriously.
...what are you talking about?
You can't trust nobody.
A human can not function trusting 0% if 100% of the people.
Who is talking about blind trust.
This has NOTHING to do with trust.
The only thing that is testable are actions. Trust is subjective and ideal in terms if politics but it is completely unverifiable when we don't even know any of these people (including trump).
They already have, I wouldn't read that deeply into it.
"Paul is Deep State" sounds, to me, a lot like "Q is a Deep State program to keep us from doing anything while we wait for The Plan to fix things" -- an idea that can sound almost-plausible when you consider only a few details but which makes no sense in the larger picture.
Both Q and the Pauls -- Rand and his father Ron -- have hugely grown the freedom movement, have red-pilled millions, are hated and opposed by the establishment, and have, in my opinion, done more for the cause of liberty than, well, any person or group other than Donald Trump himself. Like Trump, Paul is neither a perfect Constitutionalist nor a perfect libertarian, but if I couldn't accept, appreciate, and endorse pro-MAGA individuals who think slightly differently from me, I don't know what I'd do.
Rand's relentless public exposure of Fauci and his recent criminal referral of Fauci to the Justice Department for lying to Congress are examples of why I support him. [No, I don't expect today's Justice Dept to do anything to Fauci]. Red-pilling the masses about the Cabal, the scamdemic, systemic corruption, and the fact that those we're told are working FOR us are mostly working AGAINST us is absolutely critical -- and Paul is good at it.