I understand the principal that you are arguing for, but in this instance I also understand the nurse's motivation. She believes that the vaccine is harming people. She does not want to be complicit in harming people. The patients were uninformed of the consequences of taking the mRNA jab. Yes, she could've voiced her professional opinion. She would have been removed from her job, possibly fired and blackballed from the industry. She did not inject them with a harmful substance, she read not running an experiment. Apparently, many people were given a Placebo. Perhaps we can just say that she was running a triple blind study. 😁
This is not a predicament that I want to be in, however if my family were not informed and if I couldn't get through to them and if I could arrange them to get a placebo, I would do so. In the end, I would rather they be mad, than dead. I would've violated their trust and had to live with that, but knowing they were still alive would have to mitigated my feelings about the deception. She is a better person than me. This reminds me of paramedics and LEO's giving Narcan to drug addicts that have overdosed. Often, the opioid high is gone instantly and the addict becomes enraged because they ruined his/her high. When people are about to make a fatal error, you would think they would appreciate someone stepping in.
I agree better to be alive and mad, than dead and calm.
That said, we cannot win this war by deceiving those we need to be on our side. This is my only issue. What she did was for good, and it helps those 8300, at least temporarily (assuming they later go back and get the shot). But it does nothing for our movement if we value truth and honesty.
true enough.
Yes, its called trust. Something that is now broken between those patients and this nurse.
I dont know how she was found out, but now that she has been found out, the affected patients will be informed.
That's definitely something I can agree with!
I understand the principal that you are arguing for, but in this instance I also understand the nurse's motivation. She believes that the vaccine is harming people. She does not want to be complicit in harming people. The patients were uninformed of the consequences of taking the mRNA jab. Yes, she could've voiced her professional opinion. She would have been removed from her job, possibly fired and blackballed from the industry. She did not inject them with a harmful substance, she read not running an experiment. Apparently, many people were given a Placebo. Perhaps we can just say that she was running a triple blind study. 😁
I agree, the nurse's intention was good, but her method was not.
I hope many were given placebos.
This is not a predicament that I want to be in, however if my family were not informed and if I couldn't get through to them and if I could arrange them to get a placebo, I would do so. In the end, I would rather they be mad, than dead. I would've violated their trust and had to live with that, but knowing they were still alive would have to mitigated my feelings about the deception. She is a better person than me. This reminds me of paramedics and LEO's giving Narcan to drug addicts that have overdosed. Often, the opioid high is gone instantly and the addict becomes enraged because they ruined his/her high. When people are about to make a fatal error, you would think they would appreciate someone stepping in.
This is a good and well thought out point.
I agree better to be alive and mad, than dead and calm.
That said, we cannot win this war by deceiving those we need to be on our side. This is my only issue. What she did was for good, and it helps those 8300, at least temporarily (assuming they later go back and get the shot). But it does nothing for our movement if we value truth and honesty.