Copy paste:
Hmm....are you military?
My deceased fiance was.
We talked about this stuff and how military movies make people retarded as to how compartmentalized every weapon (including humans) are used in real life.
Am I saying humans haven't been killed by tanks? No, but they don't target solo humans...that is damn near wasteful. We've got bullets for days for that. You don't use more expensive munitions for a small target.
If you are talking about is army tanks attacking the cabal...what, you think that Trump would have tanks firing on antifa? Helicopter fire woukd be more efficient and would destroy our own infrastructure. Or do you think cabal elites woukd be running around on foot?
your question is Moot, , as I originally said, I think it will be MRAPS. if for some reason they actually pull out the Abrams, there will be a damn good reason.
You should also realize that the term "tanks" being used in this thread, and on the title, is really a very loose definition of "tanks", where Tanks = any sort of armored vehicle. you're being a bit literal compared to everyone else
Probably true.
I was also the second post on this thread so "everyone else" had not posted.
My first thought goes to "please appreciate the situation of literally seeing an american armed force with tanks on civilian streets for and operation"
I may be taking it literally....but aren't we talking literally? Do you all not visualize world war z or some such.
didn't say that one wouldn't use whatever weapons when shtf. But, you aren't appreciating my point. If "we" are saying that trump is in control them fir those soldiers who have been in prep for this this woukd NOT be a shtf scenario for them. At woukd be for CIVILIANS. Which is exactly why no patriot general would fire tanks willy Fucking nilly in down town usa.
sorry marune, you are still wrong. No leader would order a Tank strikevon an domestic civilian target over either ground soldiers or air. In domestic territory their is not benefit to destroying infrastructure. And there would be no point. Then govt tracks its own people faster than on foreign land. Further, tell me in what scenario would these tanks be used in the case of antifa/blm riots or individual cabal and their security. In the former foot soldiers can handle that and in the later more likely stroke teams would handle that. The only read on for tanks then would be for road blockades ...tell me, tell me how you imagine tanks would be USED.
no, you don't use a more expensive munition for individual targets. You also don't use tanks for taking out individuals. Marine, what did you do in the marines? You've got to know this. Why are you acting like you don't.
No, operating a blackhawk is not more expensive for a crowd strike than a tank. Literally. My fiance worked on blackhawks before reclassing to be an apache crew chief. They take helicopters out for nothing. Tanks aren't a mobile or agile at all. Operation of a tank is WAY costlier than a helicopter. Like...wtf are you talking about? Once again, I was not suggesting an airstrike for a single target... Aren't we talking about taking out the zombies the cabal will send out? When I said individual I meant...as in human(s) in contrast to building(s).
mmm, weird thing is, you are saying that I shouldn't go around "correcting people" if I've never bern in the sandbox. Well, first, you acknowledged that I was right. Tanks aren't fir human targets. Second, I can have not been in the field and still be right. In fact...isn't true that many many many military don't serve in the field and yet could have knowledge of how operations work. Third, your correction of me boils down to: "when scared fire boom boom" which, as a marine, makes sense. However, I am hoping our army strong woukd not be panick fight Antifa like they are the viet cong. I should hope those soy boys do not make out soldiers nervous. But, while I haven't been in the field, my fiance was deployed to Afghanistan (and iraq but we weren't together then) and we would literally have our yahoo video chat open all the time. We'd talk all the time about it (as mentioned previously). Don't discount the realness if being the spouse left behind. So, kindly, go eff yourself with your dismissiveness of my fiancé's service and what he shared with me in these nights as head comfort me as i heard mortars go off on the distance.
Omg DISAGREEMENT DISAGREEMENT MUST BE A SHILL.
You are really a wussy lazy as marine as that for your Go to.
My fiance like I said, worked on both black hawks and Apache. He died from an apache accident in kandahar (or however the fuck you spell it).
You are a complete asshole with little reading comprehension as you missed the points i was making and only cone out with strawman of "tanks shoot at whatever" no shit that happens. Already acknowledged that.
But is YOU think Trump is going to send tanks to shot at Americans....
Literally retarded that you think I am a shill.
What a lazy thought.
Sure I could mis-remembet what he said- does not make me a shill.
Second why are you mad?
Third, once again not talking about some fuck village that the DS is attacking decade specifically talking about Trump in US land.
Forth, once again never said it didn't EVER happen. What I said was a helicopter strike is more likely.
That is fact.
Copy paste: Hmm....are you military? My deceased fiance was. We talked about this stuff and how military movies make people retarded as to how compartmentalized every weapon (including humans) are used in real life.
Am I saying humans haven't been killed by tanks? No, but they don't target solo humans...that is damn near wasteful. We've got bullets for days for that. You don't use more expensive munitions for a small target.
If you are talking about is army tanks attacking the cabal...what, you think that Trump would have tanks firing on antifa? Helicopter fire woukd be more efficient and would destroy our own infrastructure. Or do you think cabal elites woukd be running around on foot?
Think about it.
your question is Moot, , as I originally said, I think it will be MRAPS. if for some reason they actually pull out the Abrams, there will be a damn good reason.
You should also realize that the term "tanks" being used in this thread, and on the title, is really a very loose definition of "tanks", where Tanks = any sort of armored vehicle. you're being a bit literal compared to everyone else
Probably true. I was also the second post on this thread so "everyone else" had not posted.
My first thought goes to "please appreciate the situation of literally seeing an american armed force with tanks on civilian streets for and operation"
I may be taking it literally....but aren't we talking literally? Do you all not visualize world war z or some such.
Appreciate the gravity of that.
didn't say that one wouldn't use whatever weapons when shtf. But, you aren't appreciating my point. If "we" are saying that trump is in control them fir those soldiers who have been in prep for this this woukd NOT be a shtf scenario for them. At woukd be for CIVILIANS. Which is exactly why no patriot general would fire tanks willy Fucking nilly in down town usa.
sorry marune, you are still wrong. No leader would order a Tank strikevon an domestic civilian target over either ground soldiers or air. In domestic territory their is not benefit to destroying infrastructure. And there would be no point. Then govt tracks its own people faster than on foreign land. Further, tell me in what scenario would these tanks be used in the case of antifa/blm riots or individual cabal and their security. In the former foot soldiers can handle that and in the later more likely stroke teams would handle that. The only read on for tanks then would be for road blockades ...tell me, tell me how you imagine tanks would be USED.
no, you don't use a more expensive munition for individual targets. You also don't use tanks for taking out individuals. Marine, what did you do in the marines? You've got to know this. Why are you acting like you don't. No, operating a blackhawk is not more expensive for a crowd strike than a tank. Literally. My fiance worked on blackhawks before reclassing to be an apache crew chief. They take helicopters out for nothing. Tanks aren't a mobile or agile at all. Operation of a tank is WAY costlier than a helicopter. Like...wtf are you talking about? Once again, I was not suggesting an airstrike for a single target... Aren't we talking about taking out the zombies the cabal will send out? When I said individual I meant...as in human(s) in contrast to building(s).
mmm, weird thing is, you are saying that I shouldn't go around "correcting people" if I've never bern in the sandbox. Well, first, you acknowledged that I was right. Tanks aren't fir human targets. Second, I can have not been in the field and still be right. In fact...isn't true that many many many military don't serve in the field and yet could have knowledge of how operations work. Third, your correction of me boils down to: "when scared fire boom boom" which, as a marine, makes sense. However, I am hoping our army strong woukd not be panick fight Antifa like they are the viet cong. I should hope those soy boys do not make out soldiers nervous. But, while I haven't been in the field, my fiance was deployed to Afghanistan (and iraq but we weren't together then) and we would literally have our yahoo video chat open all the time. We'd talk all the time about it (as mentioned previously). Don't discount the realness if being the spouse left behind. So, kindly, go eff yourself with your dismissiveness of my fiancé's service and what he shared with me in these nights as head comfort me as i heard mortars go off on the distance.
Once again, nothing I've stated is incorrect.
Omg DISAGREEMENT DISAGREEMENT MUST BE A SHILL. You are really a wussy lazy as marine as that for your Go to.
My fiance like I said, worked on both black hawks and Apache. He died from an apache accident in kandahar (or however the fuck you spell it).
You are a complete asshole with little reading comprehension as you missed the points i was making and only cone out with strawman of "tanks shoot at whatever" no shit that happens. Already acknowledged that.
But is YOU think Trump is going to send tanks to shot at Americans....
You
Are
Literally
Retarded.
Literally retarded that you think I am a shill. What a lazy thought. Sure I could mis-remembet what he said- does not make me a shill. Second why are you mad? Third, once again not talking about some fuck village that the DS is attacking decade specifically talking about Trump in US land. Forth, once again never said it didn't EVER happen. What I said was a helicopter strike is more likely. That is fact.