ELECTION FRAUD FRIDAY: Post symposium discussion thread! What did we learn? What should we be working on, now? What happens next? Where's my coffee?
(media.greatawakening.win)
🗣️ DISCUSSION 💬
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (240)
sorted by:
Right, but that does not give us leave to sit on our ass and do nothing.
The symposiums purpose was to call attention, and bring focus to evidenced based claims of election fraud.
The military may be the only way, but if you think about it, we are an essential part of the military's game plan?
Before a military action, we often hear our national leaders make speeches to justify the action, and to win the people's support. F. Roosevelt, A day that will live in infamy. (granted the justification for most wars was based deception and lies), George Bush's, speech leading up to launch of Gulf War. For good or bad, truth, lies, whatever, the purpose was to provide a moral justification, and to sell the idea to the America people.
We are part of the military operation, and our job is to awaken people to the evil lies of those that want to control we free people, to show them the true face of the socialist phantom that they now embrace. To help them see that the corruption that pervades our society, is good for neither left or right.
If we use the Toilman model of argumentation, (which G. Bush used to justify his war) we will see the logical path:
Claim: A statement that something is so.
Data: The backing for the claim.
Warrant: The link between the claim and the grounds.
Backing: Support for the warrant.
Modality: The degree of certainty employed in offering the argument.
Rebuttal: Exceptions to the initial claim.
Exception would be something like.
The military may be the only way, but without us playing out part, that way will not long succeed.
tkx
I'm just glad you put this out. I understand, we must take part of this process. God bless!!
Dittto fren.