Sorry, I still don't trust this shit. Is anything really "unhackable"?
I feel that paper ballots, in person, with a chain of custody is the most secure. But hell, I honestly wouldn't even trust that 100% anymore!
Blockchain removes the possibility of human error and or corruption, which is the only real problem with paper ballots and chain of custody.
The blockchain isn't something controlled by any one person, which is what he means by "next to unhackable". Below video I showed my dad a few months back that eased his mind about blockchain and btc:
Blockchain is really useful and important technology. I think there's a good reason nobody knows who Satoshi is (name credited to Bitcoin blockchain whitepaper), just like nobody knows who Q is. Blockchain very well could be one of the many stones David threw to slay Goliath.
Block chain voting will be next to unhackable…. This is the way
Yep but not through the post office. Still needs to be in person.
Blockchain will make that irrelevant. Look up the identity stack
Sorry, I still don't trust this shit. Is anything really "unhackable"? I feel that paper ballots, in person, with a chain of custody is the most secure. But hell, I honestly wouldn't even trust that 100% anymore!
Chain of Custody is only improved with the implementation of Block Chain. That is exactly what Block Chain is best used for.
Blockchain removes the possibility of human error and or corruption, which is the only real problem with paper ballots and chain of custody.
The blockchain isn't something controlled by any one person, which is what he means by "next to unhackable". Below video I showed my dad a few months back that eased his mind about blockchain and btc:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SSo_EIwHSd4
Blockchain is really useful and important technology. I think there's a good reason nobody knows who Satoshi is (name credited to Bitcoin blockchain whitepaper), just like nobody knows who Q is. Blockchain very well could be one of the many stones David threw to slay Goliath.