Just asking...how are these antibody checks valid?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (21)
sorted by:
Its genome has certainly been sequenced. They’re testing for certain small segments of genetic material from its genome when they do PCR tests. The antibody tests look for markers in human antibodies which correspond to the antibodies produced to the spike protein, or any of the other antigenic proteins from the virus. You would think that the Chinese certainly isolated the virus when they were tinkering with it in Wuhan...
Virologists claim the full genome sequence for COVID-19 should be 30,000 nucleotide base pairs long. But how would they know when they have never isolated a full genomic organism to do this? There is no virus that has been isolated and purified. So there cannot be a 30,000 nucleotide base pair to determine.
It's made up!
How can I state this? They use a PCR Test that does not look for COVID-19 (because it can't), but rather looks for broken down fragment primer genetic sequences of 18 to 300 base pair long out of 30,000 base pairs that is found in nearly everything like for example, 90 known genetic sequences and 92 known animal and bacterial genetic sequences. This is why we see papaya, kiwis, goats, coca-cola, motor oil, apple juice, blueberries and even tap water testing positive for COVID-19.
Since the virus is not isolated and purified, virologists have to invent a full genome in a computer. This is called a -- 'In Silico' genome. 'In Silico' means a computer simulation or in virtual reality. In other words, it is fabricated; fictional; or simply imaginary.
Virologists took a sputum sample from a sick individual in Wuhan hospital with atypical pneumonia and built an In Silico COVID-19 virus genome in the lab computer using a 'BLAST N' tool and mixing this with previous In Silico imaginary computer generated genetic sequences of SARS (Wuhan-Hu-1 virus) and the bat Corona Virus RaTG-13. Then they invoked the computer to rearrange the sputum chemically deluded elixir sample of the Wuhan pneumonia infected individual until it matched the new SARS-2 sequence their computer made-up.
If one wanted to, they could ask the BLAST N tool to put in the genetic sequence of a banana and the computer would rearrange anybody's genetic sputum chemical elixir fragments until they matched a full banana genome.
Since no one has the same exact genetic fragments found in their sputum, every time this is entered into the computer to rearrange someone's sputum sample, in the In Silico COVID-19 genome template, the computer will have to calculate it slightly differently than the original Wuhan individual's sputum sample. The computer produces errors and is a continuous and perpetual program 'glitch'. The algorithm is programmed to fill in the blanks along the way. However, this 'glitich' is called a 'virus mutation' or variant.
Now you know the matrix we actually live in. The COVID-19 virus is a computer generated fiction. There is 'something' else that is real disease. The COVID-19 virus is nothing more than the symptoms of 'something' that is causing the illness.
Thank you, that sounds knowledgeable.
The PCR tests were not intended to be diagnostic as we have understood from the inventor.
If one hasn't had the vax, but wants to confirm/refute that they have had covid, would looking for this marker be effective?
Maybe. There are a lot of variables at play. The antibody tests themselves are far from perfect- some may be cheap Chinese tests with low sensitivity/specificity. Other tests may be better but still imperfect. One of the big issues is the difficulty in detecting small amounts of antibodies. Most of the tests currently look for IgG in the blood. Just because the test isn’t sensitive enough to detect it doesn’t mean it isn’t there, or that there aren’t some memory B cells in the lymphatic tissues which still “remember” the disease. As far as I know, few or none of the tests look for IgA in the nasal mucosal tissues. I could be wrong, but I haven’t seen any. So you may have some success but it’s certainly not a guarantee, depending on the test, how persistent your antibody signal is, and how long ago you had it.
Looking for pcs of the 30 base pairs of the genome is not effective, The FDA website clearly states the PCR test was based off of a Flu sample not covid 19. Thus no flu deaths in over a year, all covid. it is a shell game, if they release the full 300 base pair genome the gig is up and every scientist worth their salt can tell you it was not only man made but patented years ago.
I've asked the OP's question before and the only links provided were from the nih.....ya know, the people who funded the gain of function...If you know of another isolation, I would like to see it so I can include it every other day when this topic respawns.
The PCR test were waaayy over cycled meaning it would detect that fart you smelled from your grandad last holiday season. Oh and the CDC has already put out weeks ago that the PCR test can't tell the difference from covid and the flu.
Shall we dig up the comments of Kary Mullis (inventor of the test)?
Who is actually taking the time to do true antibody testing? That would destroy so many narratives...
I have no idea, all I know is that when Son(who lives in WA) had to go to ER for the second time (first time they gave him Steroids and an anti viral cocktail and sent him home the next day) but a few days later had developed v-Pneumonia while fighting covid, his oxy and BP kept dipping out, they had given him "antibody infusion" and sent him home the next morning having stabilized and is still recovering a week later but, getting much better.
I’d sure love some population-level antibody testing. I’ve seen a couple of studies where it’s been done, but we need a whole lot more. I think that could provide a final nail in the coffin for this lockdown BS
Agreed. The fact that we haven't seen more of it is extremely damning of our local medical practitioners. They know.