333
Comments (96)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
1
farpointpatriot 1 point ago +2 / -1

I don't think they did According to the letter from the FDA today, it is still under the EUA ... this is from Paragraph two of the letter:

On August 23, 2021, having concluded that revising this EUA is appropriate to protect the public health or safety under section 564(g)(2) of the Act, FDA is reissuing the August 12, 2021 letter of authorization in its entirety with revisions incorporated to clarify that the EUA will remain in place for the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine for the previously-authorized indication and uses, and to authorize use of COMIRNATY (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) under this EUA for certain uses that are not included in the approved BLA. In addition, the Fact Sheet for Healthcare Providers Administering Vaccine (Vaccination Providers) was revised to provide updates on expiration dating of the authorized Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine and to update language regarding warnings and precautions related to myocarditis and pericarditis. The Fact Sheet for Recipients and Caregivers was updated as the Vaccine Information Fact Sheet for Recipients and Caregivers, which comprises the Fact Sheet for the authorized Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine and information about the FDA-licensed vaccine, COMIRNATY (COVID19 Vaccine, mRNA).

We REALLY need a lawfag to help on this. What does "under this EUA for certain uses that are not included in the approved BLA" mean?

This reads to me like the COMIRNATY shot is now included in the EUA ... and NOT "Fully Authorized".

3
ABrainDisease 3 points ago +3 / -0

People are sayings its approved based on the paragraph directly above the one youve quoted.