Refuse the COVID-19 test. Don't give them your DNA. If this is true, it would explain the need for the high bandwidth that 5G provides
(rumble.com)
🤢 These people are sick! 🤮
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (14)
sorted by:
Need for higher bandwidth is just a natural consequence of growing data and complexity (regardless of whether or not there's a nefarious element for the 5G rollout).
I work on a field which deals with high performance networking, so I understand the nature of data and bandwidth requirements very well. There are very few applications in any industry today which requires more bandwidth than what 4G networks are capable of providing.
Data grows exponentially and requiring exponentially more bandwidth as time progresses is a foregone conclusion.
The only point worth focusing on is whether or not 5G is a health hazard or otherwise problematic or not. Because the bandwidth invariably will be, even if it isn't right now.
Yes, that is obviously a given. I'm simply mentioning that the timing and scale of the 5G rollout is not very well justified at this time, given the total lack of use cases for it.
There is overwhelming evidence of it being hazardous to human health, as has been shown by many different studies, all of which have been completely overlooked by regulatory bodies who only ever focus on the dialectric heating effect. This also isn't specific to 5G, but many other forms of non-ionizing radiation.
The situation becomes far more concerning when you combined the electromagnetic energy with a variety of toxins which we are all being exposed to, which again has never been considered at all in studies. Specifically the Glyphosate which is in literally all the food we consume, and the aluminum which is in the air we breath (as well as other things, such as most vaccines).
I agree with you, there isn't the commercial demand for the kind of bandwidth 5G can provide, it's being funded and rolled out super quick for other reasons.