The enemy uses neuro-linguistic programming in an effort to control your thoughts.
(media.greatawakening.win)
ℹ️ ⚔️ Information Warfare ⚔️ ℹ️
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (60)
sorted by:
Chlorine dioxide literally is bleach, though. I have used it as such when cleaning lab stuff, that exact chemical.
And unless you're taking Ivermectin that was prescribed to you, most people talk about "horse dewormer" because that's where people are trying to get access to Ivermectin without a prescription. Through livestock dewormer. It's the "getting this as a horse paste that was never tested on nor approved for humans" part that people are ridiculing specifically.
We aren't mislabeling these things when people are literally using these products off-label.
Chlorine dioxide doesn't stop being bleach just because you decide that it's medicine and drink it, especially when it's being drunk from a bottle that's packaged and labeled as a cleaning product.
Appropriating products for uses that they're not supposed to be used for and then demanding that everyone else recognize what you believe to be true sounds far more like neurolinguistic programming than does calling a product what it says on the box.
Why are you here shilling for big pharma?
Clinical studies with chlorine dioxide. Bleach is sodium hypochlorite.
Here's a review of ivermectin on amazon from someone who treated themselves., many such cases.
Review of the Emerging Evidence Demonstrating the Efficacy of Ivermectin in the Prophylaxis and Treatment of COVID-19
Ivermectin Could Have Saved ‘Millions’ of Lives — But Doctors Were Told Not to Use It
Bleach is a substance that bleaches things (ie, removes stains, usually). There are a few compounds that are legally and scientifically considered "bleach."
I don't think you actually read the study about the chlorine dioxide, because it was an in vitro experiment that basically proves this bleach kills MRSA. In a dish. Not in the body. Note, from your paper:
They mention that people use it as a medication, but it wasn't what they tested. They demonstrated that bleach kills bacteria in a dish. Which we knew. Which is why we use it as a bleach. This is pretty clearly stated in the paper if you read it. They want you to believe that it might be okay to drink, but their study doesn't even explore that possibility, because again, they did this experiment in vitro, not in vivo.
I don't accept Amazon reviews as scientific proof of anything other than the notion that people sometimes write and post stuff on Amazon.
I am not contesting that Ivermectin could be useful against COVID. I don't know. What I do know is that horse dewormer is a mystery vial that happens to contain Ivermectin.
If you're afraid of what might be in the vaccine, despite it having an ingredients list in which every component has been tested and approved for humans, then I can't understand why you'd rather eat a paste that is absolutely chock full of stuff that was never intended for human consumption nor ever tested on humans.
And I have absolutely no love of Big Pharma. Whatsoever. But being against Big Pharma doesn't mean trusting absolutely any random passerby that isn't Big Pharma. The world is not binary. Knowledge is much bigger than having only two sides.
You can put lemon juice in your hair, and the sun will bleach it. By your definition, putting lemon in your tea is drinking bleach.
Technically, yes. Decent counter.