598
Glenn Beck (media.greatawakening.win)
posted ago by MrsBitterButter ago by MrsBitterButter +600 / -2
Comments (87)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
-2
ancroidubh -2 points ago +8 / -10

Ah, thank you. Now I can spot the racists right away.

15
Shadough 15 points ago +15 / -0

As a Jewish person speaking to someone who's probably Non-Jewish, If i were you i would run myself through a history lesson about the Bolsheviks and their role in communist Russia in the early 1900's. Not all Jews are bad. But some are, Same can be said about White people, Not all are bad but some are & with the African communities etc etc, not all are bad. But we do know statistically there is a % that can be on the bad side of things. When you're done looking at the Bolsheviks, compare and contrast with what happened back then with what's going on in todays society. Keep in mind what they say "History Repeats Itself" or in Q's words, "Future Proves Past" Look at the future (21st century & compare to the early 1900's). The playbook from back then hasn't changed much in 2021.

5
ancroidubh 5 points ago +5 / -0

Thank you. I am well aware of the parallels between early to mid-twentieth century European history and the current situation in western Europe, North America and Australia. The Bolsheviks weren't the only group in the multi-way war for the Soviet Union and many ethnicities played their parts.

One of the differences between then and now is that there aren't multiple competing groups on either side, there is only good and evil; the disparate groups are operating in concert rather than competition, especially on the side of evil. Unfortunately, we on the good side have been unable, thus far, to mobilize and unify our allies for the coming events.

You are right, no one ethnicity or race is inherently evil or good; there is bad and good in all.

2
ABrainDisease 2 points ago +2 / -0

One of the differences between then and now is that there aren't multiple competing groups on either side...

Id argue there are, in fact, multiple competing groups on both sides.

Neo-Cons have been running the right for decades. Neo-cons aligned w/ conservatives to hold power while marginalizing any other right leaning voice.

The result? Conservatives are finally revolting against their relationship to neo-cons AND right leaning people that arent necessarily conservative, but are on board with the Trump movement, to start speaking up and getting involved.

And...I suspect as that group gets louder and starts getting into power, mainline conservatives wont like what they have to say on a number of points....these groups are working together but only because they have a common enemy...

The situation on the left is actually worse...The left has been controlled by neo-libs for decades. They aligned with liberals to keep control and marginalize other left wing voices.

When the neo-libs refused to secede to Bernie's movement in 2016, it caused a split liberals into 3 groups...the neo-libs & the libs that still back them, Bernie people that still want to operate with neo-libs by "pullung" them left (The Squad, TYT, Kyle Kulinski, etc.) and then the 3rd group are Bernie people that swore off any contunued neo-lib alliance and started joining the Democratic -Socialists of America.

But when the squad proved to be neo-lib tools and the DSA refused to push back on anything, the left splintering again into The Peoples Party....a socialist movement with a bit more of a nationalistic twist and advocated by people like Jimmy Dore.

The evil you speak of...if it exists, resides within the alliance between neo-cons & neo-libs.