The FDA approval lists Comirnaty as the officially approved shot. Although it claims this shot is interchangeable with the EUA Pfizer shot, it explicitly says that the two shots are "legally distinct". Document EVERYTHING and do not sign any waivers. This will be a lawsuit goldmine for service members who decide to get the shot if they are not given Comirnaty.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (62)
sorted by:
Sensitivity to light, pale skin, no heartbeat, need to consume hemoglobin to survive, general immortality but other than that, no side effects.
Nice! You are in a good place. We here are all immortal as well...so far One jab or two? I have wondered about the control group getting saline. How are they tracking that? Do they know who so they can do second saline/vax as required or is it just all willie nillie
It was Pfizer, so two.
And as I’ve said before, my medical documentation says I got a vaccine, not saline, and I never consented to the possibility of receiving anything else.
So if there is a Master Plan by the White Hats to inject me with something other than what’s on my paperwork, I hope they have deep pockets, because a lawsuit is coming as soon as they reveal that I got saline instead of what I legally signed for. It’s kind of a crime to inject someone with literally anything other than what they agreed to.
Well, you have a suit either way. Saline or not you didn't get a vaccine. At best a gene therapy prophylactic treatment.
Silly rabbit still thinks the normal rules apply. Informed consent has been completely flushed down the shitter and the EUA (aka no-can-sue) jab is the largest clinical trial in history, courtesy of the globocommie technocrat transhumanists. Why would they feel compelled to inform you if you're in the control group?
How do you expect to get paid in a lawsuit that, if you prevailed, would promptly inspire about 3 billion others to do the same? I don't think there's enough money on earth to cover that claim. Then again, if your goal is to destroy the global economy then usher in a new globocrypto controlled by the World Bank that can be easily deactivated any time a sheeple posts a mean tweet, then maybe your landmark lawsuit and the few billion others that follow will succeed in speeding us to that fate. Or maybe the massive class action will net you a sweet settlement check for $5.62 like all those Thalidomide babies who are living easy now.
Start thinking bigger and realize that unless you got an invite to Barry's raver a couple weeks ago, you're not on the "marked safe from chattel" list just like all us crazy Q tards. You may not think you're one of us now, but as Master Yoda said, "You will be".
So you're suggesting that the White Hats switched out the stuff that was in my vaccine, secretly, without informed consent, and then are banking on it simply being too infeasible for them to have to answer legally to what they did for there to be any consequences for doing that?
You guys are fully cognizant that injecting someone with a different substance than they thought is a pretty serious crime. You'd also be correct. The criminal nature and consequences of that action don't change just because of the color of hat the injector is wearing.