could Dr. Robert Young have been labeled a Quack because he was against the common narrative or in the past onto something they didnt want found
https://quackwatch.org/11ind/young3/
They are trying to say he is pretending to be an MD, but he has a legitimate claim to the Dr moniker, through his PhD. It always annoys me when people say that PhDs are not real doctors. PhDs are REAL researchers, even if one disagrees with their conclusions. That is how science works.
Also, the article states that the judge told him to stop drawing blood and analysing it. However, if the subject was willing, then it is not unethical to analyse their blood.
could Dr. Robert Young have been labeled a Quack because he was against the common narrative or in the past onto something they didnt want found https://quackwatch.org/11ind/young3/
They are trying to say he is pretending to be an MD, but he has a legitimate claim to the Dr moniker, through his PhD. It always annoys me when people say that PhDs are not real doctors. PhDs are REAL researchers, even if one disagrees with their conclusions. That is how science works.
Also, the article states that the judge told him to stop drawing blood and analysing it. However, if the subject was willing, then it is not unethical to analyse their blood.
Fuck that commie bastard judge. Should be six feet under.