...
http://www.iwf.org/news/2435061/Saudi-Migrant-Workers-Subject-to-Abuse
https://www.state.gov/j/tip/rls/tiprpt/countries/2015/243521.htm
SA was a priority.
We wish this was a dream.
Q
Say you were the NUMBER 1 consumer of child trafficking.
Let's also say the area you live in is predominantly brown-skinned, black haired, and brown eyed.
How would you go about hiding the fact you have about a dozen child sex slaves procured from all around the world in your keeping?
Well, hiding their faces at all times at threat of punishment by beatings and stonings is a good way to hide them.
Here's my theory:
The reason hijabs are forced on women in the Middle East isn't due to any religious dogma of making sure women don't tempt men; that's just a cover story.
It's because if all the "women" weren't covered head-to-toe it would be plainly obvious that the majority of them are actually child sex slaves of every ethnicity.
That could explain why the Pakistani rape gangs in the UK have the mindset they do. They actually are just doing what is done casually in every country that forces hijabs on their women. They groom, brain-wash, and enslave young girls and maybe even boys for their own sexual deviancy, then hide it from the world with strict conditioning and a dress code with a death penalty.
The ultimate significance of Saudi Arabia might just be that they are the world's largest consumer of trafficked children.
With their strict rules, even the average Saudi probably has no clue how bad it is.
Thoughts?
Causality is tricky. Are hijabs created for slavery, or did they simply create a condition for slavery to flourish? Either could be true, and either would perpetuate the other. It almost doesn't matter which came first.
Either way, what must be dealt with is that SA became a profitable and protected nexus for slavery and evil of all kinds, allowing it to flourish and expand. From that secure base it expanded in secret, capturing and corrupting politicians and business leaders everywhere. It wasn't the only nexus, but definitely one of the biggest and best secured.
It is a blessing that there was enough popular support within that culture and society to remove Al-Waleed before it was too late. It's wrong to say the culture is purely a front for evil, since we know that the same culture also allowed a correction, and for that habbening to happen.
I agree.
There are differing degrees of Islam as there are for every world religion.
They have the worst of it, though, because Islam has actively destroyed anything they disagree with. Which means, previous versions of the Quran that aren't the "right" version are done away with.
We have no good lead on which version of the Quran is closest to the original, if any.
It's been butchered so much, by so many hands, all leaving no record of the changes, and all with an internal agenda to control their adherents.
Trying to find the "real Islam" at this point is harder than finding the fabled "real socialism."
Every sect is destined to fade away as a building with no foundation.
You could say that about any religion. "Controlling adherents is the motivation" is a common attack against every organized religion. Getting pure truth is difficult; even Jesus stayed silent on that question; it may be impossible on the material earth.
I may do a post about it, but after reading a post and pdf about parasites, I think it's very possible that "these people are sick" refers to an actual parasite that leads to behavioural changes including sexual behavior, specifically pedophilia and homosexuality as a benefit to the parasite's reproductive cycle. Over time the changes in individual behavior lead to changes in society and politics. SA had conditions that allowed it to flourish unchecked.
Religion is always the excuse to get people to do what you want. It's never the core reason.
Every single war fought under the pretense of religious beliefs have all been about one thing, and one thing alone:
Land.
As long as you have land, everything else follows.
Religion has no borders, unlike nationality.
That makes it the ideal vehicle to topple an enemy nation, either by claiming the other religion is evil and must be eradicated or by infiltration, conversion, and buying/inheriting the land out from under them.
I think you can fill in the blanks from there.
Religion is always the scapegoat. It's always the ravenously greedy and pompous elite that are universally to blame. They make sure you never catch them with their hands dirty.
Are you saying that all religion is bad? Or that religion is something that exists on its own legitimately, AND is abused as a pretext for aggression.
In recent years you could argue that economy has been used, even more than religion, to topple adversaries.
I don't think that there are any previous versions of the koran, there is only one which has not been altered since mohammed recited it.
I could be wrong here, I have worked in 4 middle east countries fixing their aircraft and this is what everyone there tells me.
There is no central repository of dogma in islam as there is in Christianity, there is only interpretations of the koran by individual mullahs and scribes.