...
http://www.iwf.org/news/2435061/Saudi-Migrant-Workers-Subject-to-Abuse
https://www.state.gov/j/tip/rls/tiprpt/countries/2015/243521.htm
SA was a priority.
We wish this was a dream.
Q
Say you were the NUMBER 1 consumer of child trafficking.
Let's also say the area you live in is predominantly brown-skinned, black haired, and brown eyed.
How would you go about hiding the fact you have about a dozen child sex slaves procured from all around the world in your keeping?
Well, hiding their faces at all times at threat of punishment by beatings and stonings is a good way to hide them.
Here's my theory:
The reason hijabs are forced on women in the Middle East isn't due to any religious dogma of making sure women don't tempt men; that's just a cover story.
It's because if all the "women" weren't covered head-to-toe it would be plainly obvious that the majority of them are actually child sex slaves of every ethnicity.
That could explain why the Pakistani rape gangs in the UK have the mindset they do. They actually are just doing what is done casually in every country that forces hijabs on their women. They groom, brain-wash, and enslave young girls and maybe even boys for their own sexual deviancy, then hide it from the world with strict conditioning and a dress code with a death penalty.
The ultimate significance of Saudi Arabia might just be that they are the world's largest consumer of trafficked children.
With their strict rules, even the average Saudi probably has no clue how bad it is.
Thoughts?
Are you saying that all religion is bad? Or that religion is something that exists on its own legitimately, AND is abused as a pretext for aggression.
In recent years you could argue that economy has been used, even more than religion, to topple adversaries.
Religion is neither good nor bad.
It is an ideal hostage.
Like someone being nabbed by a bank robber who holds a gun to their head.
It's only there to stop people from shooting the bank robber.
The bank robber knows this, so a hostage is always a good idea.
A bad group infiltrates a good religion, makes their way to the control center, and then can do whatever they want because the public assumes what they have about the religion for years prior.
Eventually the rot takes hold, and the religion crumbles. That is, unless, the parasites at the top make sure enough of the original doctrine is intact -- all the stuff that makes the religion good and work.
Why do all the work yourself?
Instead, become a parasite, find the most lucrative and stable part of the host, and make sure not to kill the host as long as possible while reaping all the benefits.
Then, if you screw up and people start to turn against the religion, simply jump ship.
Find another, rinse and repeat.
Fair enough.
It's a tale as old as time.
Why do you think Jesus was so miffed with the Pharisees and not the Hebrew religion as a whole?
It's always the ones in charge that are to blame; and if not them, the ones paying them to be the face.