I had it last March. It's nasty enough that having a treatment helps. not nasty enough for a dangerous untested vax produced by cabal eugenecists and associated with "building back better" and lockdowns.
I have seen lots of your comments and I don't like them at all. You're very clever but not straightforward.
Instead of complaining, argue your point carefully, not with generalisations. It makes you look like someone who misleads"
That looks like a line you've used before and saved to your clipboard for future use. It feels out of place, apropos of nothing.
No, it wasn't a clipboard thing. It was directed to you because of this part of one of your comments.
So, the covid DOES floor the healthy then? A healthy persons immune system is NOT enough in its own? Perhaps we’d better start taking the threat of covid more seriously then.
I take issue with it as follows:
The 'rona can "floor" the healthy, although it usually doesn't and is rarely fatal.
You talk about taking the "threat of covid more seriously then" in a nonspecific way. That might imply vaxes. We have a way to take the 'rona seriously if required: ivermectin and HCQ etc. These can be used prophylactically and always should be used in place of a vax, which should never be used.
If you had specified that I would have been a real fan of your comment, but you left it open that a vax might be the answer.
How do you know that the person "calling for the US Army to pour phosphorous on Afghanistan" was one of 'us'? Many come here and make damaging comments such as the example you have given,,,for the purpose you now espouse...to denounce this site. You have added zero value or clarity with your comment...only decisiveness and are therefore as much of the problem as any of the worst who wander in. Tough love my ass. We come here to discuss and debate all the issues - with a hive mind, and there is no fault to be found in that. Also, a straightforward person would have included the actual 'phosphorous' quote and not lazily just alluded to it.
In closing, there are biblical precedents for using medicinals..." Examples of biblical medical application are the use of ‘balm’ to treat sores (Jeremiah), Fig as a cure for a boil (Isaiah), and Mandrake as a fertility remedy enabling Jacob and Leah to have a fifth son (Genesis). Mandrake had around 88 different medicinal uses in the ancient world; some of which continue to this day.https://researchoutreach.org/articles/revisiting-medicinal-plants-bible-holy-land/ .
It was not very straightforward of you to gloss over these examples to strengthen your argument against pharmaceuticals, a word derived from pharmacy and defined as, The art or practice of preparing, preserving, and compounding medicines, and of dispensing them according to the formulæ or prescriptions of medical practitioners."
I consider taking early treatment or prophylactic ivermectin or HCQ to be a good idea for most people if they are at any risk of getting ill enough to need hospital treatment or ever consider the vax.
Nothing is worse than the vax!
Cheap generic drugs are not helping pharma so you can take them. They tell you not to, that's the clue that it's safe and effective. if they lower vax rate,they are a good thing. The vax is about slavery and depopulation.
I had it last March. It's nasty enough that having a treatment helps. not nasty enough for a dangerous untested vax produced by cabal eugenecists and associated with "building back better" and lockdowns.
I have seen lots of your comments and I don't like them at all. You're very clever but not straightforward.
Mind which side you are on,
Like I said, don't generalise. Generic safe drugs out of patent are fine. They are mondo good if they displace the vax.
Think clearly and discern.
This place is not a hive mind.
Instead of complaining, argue your point carefully, not with generalisations. It makes you look like someone who misleads.
Excellent comment.
No, it wasn't a clipboard thing. It was directed to you because of this part of one of your comments.
I take issue with it as follows:
The 'rona can "floor" the healthy, although it usually doesn't and is rarely fatal.
You talk about taking the "threat of covid more seriously then" in a nonspecific way. That might imply vaxes. We have a way to take the 'rona seriously if required: ivermectin and HCQ etc. These can be used prophylactically and always should be used in place of a vax, which should never be used.
If you had specified that I would have been a real fan of your comment, but you left it open that a vax might be the answer.
See what I was getting at?
How do you know that the person "calling for the US Army to pour phosphorous on Afghanistan" was one of 'us'? Many come here and make damaging comments such as the example you have given,,,for the purpose you now espouse...to denounce this site. You have added zero value or clarity with your comment...only decisiveness and are therefore as much of the problem as any of the worst who wander in. Tough love my ass. We come here to discuss and debate all the issues - with a hive mind, and there is no fault to be found in that. Also, a straightforward person would have included the actual 'phosphorous' quote and not lazily just alluded to it.
In closing, there are biblical precedents for using medicinals..." Examples of biblical medical application are the use of ‘balm’ to treat sores (Jeremiah), Fig as a cure for a boil (Isaiah), and Mandrake as a fertility remedy enabling Jacob and Leah to have a fifth son (Genesis). Mandrake had around 88 different medicinal uses in the ancient world; some of which continue to this day.https://researchoutreach.org/articles/revisiting-medicinal-plants-bible-holy-land/ .
It was not very straightforward of you to gloss over these examples to strengthen your argument against pharmaceuticals, a word derived from pharmacy and defined as, The art or practice of preparing, preserving, and compounding medicines, and of dispensing them according to the formulæ or prescriptions of medical practitioners."
Your humility is a guidepost to us all, Mr. (or Ms.) 28 Days.
I consider taking early treatment or prophylactic ivermectin or HCQ to be a good idea for most people if they are at any risk of getting ill enough to need hospital treatment or ever consider the vax.
Nothing is worse than the vax!
Cheap generic drugs are not helping pharma so you can take them. They tell you not to, that's the clue that it's safe and effective. if they lower vax rate,they are a good thing. The vax is about slavery and depopulation.
Can't you see that? Not all drugs are bad.
That's a well thought out reply. Thanks!