Ahhh I forgot about India! Thanks. The only problem here is that they are relying on PCR test results to prove that Ivermectin is effective for treating COVID. They show 2% of Ivermectin-takers tested positive, yet 11.7% of non-takers also tested positive. Since the PCR test is bunk, these numbers don't really matter right? Your point about rna replication is interesting though. Here's what I found:
"...the most extensively characterized viral endosymbionts of protozoan parasites of medical relevance are small, non-enveloped, double-stranded (ds) RNA viruses of the family Totiviridae..."
So, double-stranded RNA viruses are the most common product of protozoan parasites...which can easily be stopped by simply taking Ivermectin? Any scientists out there that can help make sense of all this? I just don't like jumping to conclusions about things I don't fully understand. What do you think?
Ahhh I forgot about India! Thanks. The only problem here is that they are relying on PCR test results to prove that Ivermectin is effective for treating COVID. They show 2% of Ivermectin-takers tested positive, yet 11.7% of non-takers also tested positive. Since the PCR test is bunk, these numbers don't really matter right? Your point about rna replication is interesting though. Here's what I found:
"...the most extensively characterized viral endosymbionts of protozoan parasites of medical relevance are small, non-enveloped, double-stranded (ds) RNA viruses of the family Totiviridae..."
https://virologyj.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12985-020-01410-1
So, double-stranded RNA viruses are the most common product of protozoan parasites...which can easily be stopped by simply taking Ivermectin? Any scientists out there that can help make sense of all this? I just don't like jumping to conclusions about things I don't fully understand. What do you think?