Q taught us how to use critical thinking and how to find hidden agendas. I just hope we will never forget all that he taught after the Awakening happens.
Without this article, I would never have learnt so much about the way Thomas works and how much they are scared of him. The best part about the Majority Opinion in that he added this, and explained the original murder. Shows that Thomas, even as a SCOTUS Justice, still focuses on the human element in the case, which is what we want our judicial system to go back.
The dissent omitted any discussion of the murder that warranted petitioner’s sentence of death and the extensive procedural protections afforded to him before his last-minute, dilatory filings.
And to show how much they hate him and are scared of him:
In an appearance at a New York synagogue, I once heard Scalia give a memorable quip when he was asked about the difference between his approach and Thomas's. "I'm an originalist," Scalia said, "but I'm not a nut."
How depraved are these people, spreading fake stories about a Justice they killed and who cannot defend against this, and saying that Scalia called Clarence a nut ?
I am waiting for the day all these people meet their day of reckoning.
Notice the writer's use of "no matter how painful".
This is manipulative disingenuousness at its finest. One would have to have a brain made of latex rubber to stretch it enough to imagine Thomas authorizing, say, flaying, drawing and quartering, death by 1000 cuts, or breaking on the wheel as a means of execution.
Our forebears visited the most unthinkable, inhuman tortures on their fellow humans. Slowly, gradually crushing the head in a screw press until the eyeballs pop out and the skull implodes is not something healthy humans should ever see or want to see—even if it's Brennan's Neanderthal skull being squashed like a pumpkin.
In just a few centuries, moral humans have evolved beyond the capacity to endure, let alone inflict, such over-the-top barbarism on people whom we are executing for THEIR inhumanity to humankind.
We have a lot of executions that need to be performed, starting yesterday. Let's get to it and get it over with!
Disclaimer: pro-death-penalty, anti-torture advocate of mass executions (i.e., millions) for commies, traitors, pedophiles, murderers, etc.
Thomas authorizing, say, flaying, drawing and quartering, death by 1000 cuts, or breaking on the wheel as a means of execution.
I was actually expecting to see Thomas essentially saying this, when I cautiously clicked on this Opinion and read it from top to bottom.
There has to be a new standard of journalistic ethics that overs an opinion article, where the journalist proclaims something they clearly cannot justify from the piece, but more importantly they dont even believe it themselves. The second part is important because this journalist clearly does not believe Thomas is the Chief Justice, and yet, by penning it under "opinion" it becomes impossible to blame them.
There should be a journalistic ethics that encompasses this and all other aspects of journalism that is dishonest by intention.
Q taught us how to use critical thinking and how to find hidden agendas. I just hope we will never forget all that he taught after the Awakening happens.
Without this article, I would never have learnt so much about the way Thomas works and how much they are scared of him. The best part about the Majority Opinion in that he added this, and explained the original murder. Shows that Thomas, even as a SCOTUS Justice, still focuses on the human element in the case, which is what we want our judicial system to go back.
And to show how much they hate him and are scared of him:
How depraved are these people, spreading fake stories about a Justice they killed and who cannot defend against this, and saying that Scalia called Clarence a nut ?
I am waiting for the day all these people meet their day of reckoning.
Nice breakdown!
Notice the writer's use of "no matter how painful".
This is manipulative disingenuousness at its finest. One would have to have a brain made of latex rubber to stretch it enough to imagine Thomas authorizing, say, flaying, drawing and quartering, death by 1000 cuts, or breaking on the wheel as a means of execution.
Our forebears visited the most unthinkable, inhuman tortures on their fellow humans. Slowly, gradually crushing the head in a screw press until the eyeballs pop out and the skull implodes is not something healthy humans should ever see or want to see—even if it's Brennan's Neanderthal skull being squashed like a pumpkin.
In just a few centuries, moral humans have evolved beyond the capacity to endure, let alone inflict, such over-the-top barbarism on people whom we are executing for THEIR inhumanity to humankind.
We have a lot of executions that need to be performed, starting yesterday. Let's get to it and get it over with!
Disclaimer: pro-death-penalty, anti-torture advocate of mass executions (i.e., millions) for commies, traitors, pedophiles, murderers, etc.
I was actually expecting to see Thomas essentially saying this, when I cautiously clicked on this Opinion and read it from top to bottom.
There has to be a new standard of journalistic ethics that overs an opinion article, where the journalist proclaims something they clearly cannot justify from the piece, but more importantly they dont even believe it themselves. The second part is important because this journalist clearly does not believe Thomas is the Chief Justice, and yet, by penning it under "opinion" it becomes impossible to blame them.
There should be a journalistic ethics that encompasses this and all other aspects of journalism that is dishonest by intention.
I dunno about you but I wouldn't mind watching Brennan's eyes pop out of his crushed skull.
I believe they call that a confirmed kill.
Don’t forget Barry & Co?
We will, if we fail to raise kids that raise kids that raise kids... and so on, that value truth and kindness over acting nice to fit in.