Notice the writer's use of "no matter how painful".
This is manipulative disingenuousness at its finest. One would have to have a brain made of latex rubber to stretch it enough to imagine Thomas authorizing, say, flaying, drawing and quartering, death by 1000 cuts, or breaking on the wheel as a means of execution.
Our forebears visited the most unthinkable, inhuman tortures on their fellow humans. Slowly, gradually crushing the head in a screw press until the eyeballs pop out and the skull implodes is not something healthy humans should ever see or want to see—even if it's Brennan's Neanderthal skull being squashed like a pumpkin.
In just a few centuries, moral humans have evolved beyond the capacity to endure, let alone inflict, such over-the-top barbarism on people whom we are executing for THEIR inhumanity to humankind.
We have a lot of executions that need to be performed, starting yesterday. Let's get to it and get it over with!
Disclaimer: pro-death-penalty, anti-torture advocate of mass executions (i.e., millions) for commies, traitors, pedophiles, murderers, etc.
Thomas authorizing, say, flaying, drawing and quartering, death by 1000 cuts, or breaking on the wheel as a means of execution.
I was actually expecting to see Thomas essentially saying this, when I cautiously clicked on this Opinion and read it from top to bottom.
There has to be a new standard of journalistic ethics that overs an opinion article, where the journalist proclaims something they clearly cannot justify from the piece, but more importantly they dont even believe it themselves. The second part is important because this journalist clearly does not believe Thomas is the Chief Justice, and yet, by penning it under "opinion" it becomes impossible to blame them.
There should be a journalistic ethics that encompasses this and all other aspects of journalism that is dishonest by intention.
Nice breakdown!
Notice the writer's use of "no matter how painful".
This is manipulative disingenuousness at its finest. One would have to have a brain made of latex rubber to stretch it enough to imagine Thomas authorizing, say, flaying, drawing and quartering, death by 1000 cuts, or breaking on the wheel as a means of execution.
Our forebears visited the most unthinkable, inhuman tortures on their fellow humans. Slowly, gradually crushing the head in a screw press until the eyeballs pop out and the skull implodes is not something healthy humans should ever see or want to see—even if it's Brennan's Neanderthal skull being squashed like a pumpkin.
In just a few centuries, moral humans have evolved beyond the capacity to endure, let alone inflict, such over-the-top barbarism on people whom we are executing for THEIR inhumanity to humankind.
We have a lot of executions that need to be performed, starting yesterday. Let's get to it and get it over with!
Disclaimer: pro-death-penalty, anti-torture advocate of mass executions (i.e., millions) for commies, traitors, pedophiles, murderers, etc.
I was actually expecting to see Thomas essentially saying this, when I cautiously clicked on this Opinion and read it from top to bottom.
There has to be a new standard of journalistic ethics that overs an opinion article, where the journalist proclaims something they clearly cannot justify from the piece, but more importantly they dont even believe it themselves. The second part is important because this journalist clearly does not believe Thomas is the Chief Justice, and yet, by penning it under "opinion" it becomes impossible to blame them.
There should be a journalistic ethics that encompasses this and all other aspects of journalism that is dishonest by intention.
I dunno about you but I wouldn't mind watching Brennan's eyes pop out of his crushed skull.
I believe they call that a confirmed kill.
Don’t forget Barry & Co?