[ [ This reply was inspired by an extraordinary earlier post today by Quelle, about Q's seeming 'non-linear time'.
Many others shared varying profound insights, as to how far and deep our empowerment from this Great Awakening may extend. It may not be just about uncovering more facts.
Also what seemed questionable to many in the past (e.g. 'the sun emits more than just light and heat', or that 'magnetic fields affect the brain', or '2020 was a digital Pearl Harbor'), is resoundingly validated today.
This kind of subject seems to be subtly 'percolating in the field' almost everywhere I go, so it seems like a timely one to consider and discern for ourselves. The cabal shouldn't be hoarding more knowledge about navigating reality, than the rest of humanity understands.
http://greatawakening.win/p/12kFdqitu5/q-explains-nonlinear-time-in-q39/c
Q explains non-linear time in Q#3929. "Future proves past[events unlock.]" While God's clock operates outside of our grasp humans can create their own time lines by merely fudging global narrative and consensus. The event happened decades ago but new media creates a mental worm hole to the past. ] ]
.
Thank you everyone for sharing this potentially hugely-empowering discussion (!) that Quelle has introduced.
It raises deeper questions as to other (possibly even more essential) aspects to humankind's great awakening, from a more 'emanationist' perspective (i.e. outer reality/the physical universe is arising 'out from' from a central consciousness, vs. human mind and consciousness 'evolved upward' out of physical matter. Both/and could also be so, not to mention any complex spiritual aspects).
It's logical to assume we humans as yet know relatively little about the fundamental nature of both ourselves, and/or, how we actually operate within whatever reality is. A short time ago e.g., even the idea that stars emit a radio wave signature was a concept unknown to conventional astronomers.
If higher vibrations in physics can entrain lower vibrations, and this even spills over into human thought and intent (as implied in Dr. Masaru Emoto's and so many others' experiments) - does this also give insights into how humans can best 'navigate' our life and times?
Our diverse personal/communal visions for Good would also inherently accord with any higher-order 'divine templates'/archetypes of creation - as they express qualities in vibrational harmony with things like fullness of life, love, joy, freedom, happiness, i.e. 'prospering in all ways, even as our soul prospers'.
So being higher-order, 'from above' the level causing the problems, they'd also contain a vast advantage over any and all plots or negative 'blueprints' that evil intent may be attempting to coerce.
And so in intentionally choosing to focus energy and attention on our visions for good (in myriad creative ways like prayer, meditation, visioning, reflection, changing/taking back language, etc.) - as some have observed, 'the higher vibration will alway entrain the lower'.
It may be akin to amping quantum possibilities into stochastic waves of probability - aka a 'leavening' principle. And do 'two or more' doing this, exponentially amp up the this creative process?
Einstein said 'God does not play dice with the universe'. But what if, considering the quantum Observer Effect and apparent mind/energy/matter interface - maybe..... we humans can play with loaded dice? :)
Maybe it's kind of like, we're taking little fledgeling flights into learning to co-create itself, i.e. 'editing' reality more directly, not just at the end-user level. I mean, what was it really, when people helped 'hold up' Moses' arms (strength), and 'the battle went their way'?
And so can we even 'effortlessly' change/edit the dread-based Official_Narratives!! that certain groups attempt to insert into our collective psyche? Does 'a little of this', shift a lot of 'that'?
Can we sort of glance at a headline from a 'higher' perspective - and just 'decide differently'? And possibly something will shift, vs. continually 'struggling against' Chinese handcuffs designed by others? Is that like a small David (intrinsically 'king') defeating the devolved cabal's goliath?
If so, we humans actually do have 'dominion' on this planet, we are authority.
Then the vision for the United Stated of America and our Constitution, e.g., was and is a next evolutionary step in embodying this 'divine template' core truth of individual empowerment onto the planet, for the benefit of all people.
From our different perspectives, we as individual co-creators (made 'in the image and likeness') are sacredly entitled to be the visionaries and artists of our own lives and communities. Not so some lower-order, devolved, deceiving cabal - which can only try to suck energy and focus away from everyone's hopes for good.
And so, does our building 'true' (in harmony with the divine templates for the multiverse) also imply full creative freedom - akin to Mr. Spock's Vulcan philosophy 'IDIC': Infinite Diversity in Infinite Combinations. :) Both/and, 'unity in diversity' + 'e pluribus unum'.
And are the apparent evidences of 'monolithic evil all around us', the swamp, cabal, et al - only temporary lesser/transitionary states or quantum possibility fields, that they are frantically trying to amp up? If so, in reality they are actually no match for the the incoming Good, Beautiful and True.
And could our creative say even transcend space-time, matter, etc. and extend into past, present, future? Someone once did state, *'Behold - I make all things new.'
If we're in some kind of planetary 'Battle of the Bands' - yes then, we should 'lift up our hearts'/vision so much! Whatever it may 'seem' like at our starting point. Greater humanity does win when we start creating our own true Music.
And if we humans are starting to realize such long-suppressed truths about our inherent potential? All bets are off.
(Well at least ... I want/hope that is so, in 'my' individual creative corner/hologram of reality :)
Ok, but then people shouldn’t look into 'horse paste' either, as it’s been assigned a negative label too.
I know what you’re saying, and everyone is absolutely entitled to their best perspective on things. But actually, I think some corners of science are pretty far along in validating what was once thought of as a ‘separate’ realm of mysticism in previous times. But it's such an impossibly vast and complex subject, there’s no way to get into it here.
And again, the cabal knows all this and weaponizes it, while trying to suppress the supporting science from becoming public knowledge. I mean, even look how they’re trying to cancel ivermectin.
But does human consciousness somehow ‘participate directly’ in outer reality? To many people throughout all history? It’s been more than amply demonstrated.
So for me, it’s without a doubt. We humans & our human consciousness are both perceptual instruments (and this on many levels beyond the ‘5 senses’: i.e., people can sense/pick up e-m (even 5-G effects), the ‘signature’ of allergens (homeopathy), emotion, apparent ‘telepathy’ and remote viewing, and yes, even to perceiving spiritual/mystical visions + so much more); and as well, we are active agents in the world (also on many levels, seen and unseen), of which some do seem to involve direct and subtle ‘mystical action' and/or quantum level choices.
“Not only is the Universe stranger than we think, it is stranger than we can think.” ― Werner Heisenberg (who was born over a century ago)
Again, the cabal knows about any advances in this area, and knee-jerk weaponizes it, while at the same time trying to suppress the supporting science from becoming public knowledge
To defer to a couple of real world scientists - Col. Tom Bearden and Werner Heisenberg - here are sample links as to ‘mysticism’ and i.e., some related advances in e-m theory (leading, for one example, to being able to ‘engineer reality’ using the ‘time-axis’(!), and its myriad practical implications for technical application:
.
Col. Tom Bearden
On ’engineering’ reality ( http://cheniere.org/techpapers/Precursor%20Engineering1.htm, Precursor Engineering: Directly Altering Physical Reality > We have moved from “entropic engineering” to “negentropic ['creative'] engineering” because triode engineering is also a process for re-ordering disordered energy. It is a process for consuming entropy and producing negative entropy.). And as to ‘effortlessness’ > ‘Thus, changing the force-free “EM field”—as it exists in space in its precursor form (energy field form) prior to its interaction with charge and matter—is work-free’.);
And mind also is able to directly interface with these e-m fields and technology (http://cheniere.org/explore%20articles/mind%20control1/index.html ) and……….. so. Much. More.
http://cheniere.org (Tom Bearden’s site & knowledge are VAST, tntm)
http://cheniere.org/index2.html
The Tom Bearden Website - ’Read how the future of humanity has been hi-jacked for more than 50 years by the weaponization of scalar electromagnetics and how the Western scientific community has been blind-sided by dogmatic adherence to 1867 electrical theory.’
http://cheniere.org/books/excalibur/glossary/014edited.htm / http://cheniere.org/misc/bearden%20cv%20long.htm - T.E. Bearden’s Bio & CV
http://cheniere.org/toc.html
The Tom Bearden Website - Table of Contents / Topics
.
And to add some of Werner Heisenberg’s thoughts:
http://www.goodreads.com/author/quotes/64309.Werner_Heisenberg
Werner Heisenberg Quotes (Author of Physics and Philosophy)
“Not only is the Universe stranger than we think, it is stranger than we can think.” ― Werner Heisenberg
“What we observe is not nature itself, but nature exposed to our method of questioning.” ― Werner Heisenberg
“I think that modern physics has definitely decided in favor of Plato. In fact the smallest units of matter are not physical objects in the ordinary sense; they are forms, ideas which can be expressed unambiguously only in mathematical language.” ― Werner Heisenberg
“[T]he atoms or elementary particles themselves are not real; they form a world of potentialities or possibilities rather than one of things or facts.” ― Werner Heisenberg
“In classical physics, science started from the belief – or should one say, from the illusion? – that we could describe the world, or least parts of the world, without any reference to ourselves.” ― Werner Heisenberg
“[The probability wave] meant a tendency for something. It was a quantitative version of the old concept of "potentia" in Aristoelian philosophy. It introduced something standing in the middle between the idea of an event and the actual event, a strange kind of physical reality just in the middle between possibility and reality.” ― Werner Heisenberg
“In the history of science, ever since the famous trial of Galileo, it has repeatedly been claimed that scientific truth cannot be reconciled with the religious interpretation of the world. Although I an now convinced that scientific truth is unassailable in its own field, I have never found it possible to dismiss the content of religious thinking as simply part of an outmoded phase in the consciousness of mankind, a part we shall have to give up from now on, Thus in the course of my life I have repeatedly been compelled to ponder on the relationship of these two regions of though, for I have never been able to doubt the reality of that to which they point.” ― Werner Heisenberg
“If nature leads us to mathematical forms of great simplicity and beauty—by forms, I am referring to coherent systems of hypotheses, axioms, etc.—to forms that no one has previously encountered, we cannot help thinking that they are “true,” that they reveal a genuine feature of nature…. You must have felt this too: the almost frightening simplicity and wholeness of the relationships which nature suddenly spreads out before us and for which none of us was in the least prepared.” ― Werner Heisenberg
“The positivists have a simple solution: the world must be divided into that which we can say clearly and the rest, which we had better pass over in silence. But can anyone conceive of a more pointless philosophy, seeing that what we can say clearly amounts to next to nothing? If we omitted all that is unclear, we would probably be left completely uninteresting and trivial tautologies.” ― Werner Heisenberg
“Revere those things beyond science which really matter and about which it is so difficult to speak.” ― Werner Heisenberg
“Whenever we proceed from the known into the unknown we may hope to understand, but we may have to learn at the same time a new meaning of the word 'understanding.” ― Werner Karl Heisenberg
“Quantum theory provides us with a striking illustration of the fact that we can fully understand a connection though we can only speak of it in images and parables.” ― Werner Heisenberg
AFAIK it takes a quorum of only about 80 people to picture a specific outcome and it will happen. If we all visualised a specific event...