Amusing self-reflection moment; When I started reading purposely opposing news sources I found threads of commonality. From there I started seeing what's been "hiding."
I can't say I overtly believe everything, for instance, what people opposing the vaccine are saying. But the overt response from those trying to oppress it tells me clearly what they're saying shouldn't be trusted whatsoever.
It had made me question the intent and context of what I used to be told, which oddly enough started with Gamergate.
Love how that thread immediately goes to the "which source is trusted?" And rattles off a shit ton of well known leftist rags.
Ones I once read and cited myself, till Gamergate.
My experience in arguing with them is that they will attempt to discredit every source that doesn't agree with them.
Amusing self-reflection moment; When I started reading purposely opposing news sources I found threads of commonality. From there I started seeing what's been "hiding."
I can't say I overtly believe everything, for instance, what people opposing the vaccine are saying. But the overt response from those trying to oppress it tells me clearly what they're saying shouldn't be trusted whatsoever.
It had made me question the intent and context of what I used to be told, which oddly enough started with Gamergate.
It's all anecdotal unless it suits their narrative; in which case it's personal experience.
They love their circular, self absorbed weasel wordplay.
Was once one of them, so I know their tactics, and I do use it from time to time on them.
That person may have been the voice of reason. These days, only primary sources can be trusted.