Well, regardless of who should be credited for the discovery, Dr Frank presented the material at the cyber symposium.
I have never heard of the guy before I watched it, but regardless of what I think of him, the presentation was logical, made sense, and was very damning. The MSM reaction is telling enough to know the presentation was over the target.
That it was. There were hic ups as well. Mike and the crew did a pretty damn good job considering the attack they were under, and the infiltration. What they didn't release was as big as what they did release. Good job red team!
nobody is 100% right. it's okay to agree with some of someone's ideas. as long as you understand that, you don't have to be caught up in the personality clashes and bullshit drama. Trump even said get the vaccine, we all know that was bullshit. Let's stop picking icon's to worship and argue over.
I'm getting a little disillusioned with Pulitzer. He seems pretty high on self-promotion. His rumble channel is nothing but short videos trying to send people to his locals channel.
At least we were let in on the meeting after the fact, I don't know who Dr. Frank is, but if he is doing things behind the scenes then lets us know what transpired because of it--he is getting things accomplished. We don't know what anyone else may/or is doing at this moment, but what I do know is that not many have come forward to say because I did this, this happened and expect a lot more. We generally get crickets and are left to figure out what is going on and who is doing it.
And you know this how? What "someone"? What other "data analysis"? The standard of justice in this country is innocent until proven guilty. Accusation is not proof...but it is nearly perfect evidence of nothing.
Who is Dr. Frank?
He is the guy who discovered the voting machines in every state were rigged to allocate votes using an algorithm that was based on 2010 census data.
He presented the evidence at the cyber symposium, about which the media lied and blacked out.
You can see his presentation here: https://home.frankspeech.com/tv/video/dr-frank-displays-his-evidence-day-1-cyber-symposium-0
Actually I think that was Pinton. Dr. just kind of highjacked it and ran with it. I'm far from convinced to trust him. Lotsa clowns in the crowd.
Well, regardless of who should be credited for the discovery, Dr Frank presented the material at the cyber symposium.
I have never heard of the guy before I watched it, but regardless of what I think of him, the presentation was logical, made sense, and was very damning. The MSM reaction is telling enough to know the presentation was over the target.
That’s why I love the place. Facts. Counter facts. Counter-counter facts. Truth or at least the acknowledgment we don’t know the truth.
That it was. There were hic ups as well. Mike and the crew did a pretty damn good job considering the attack they were under, and the infiltration. What they didn't release was as big as what they did release. Good job red team!
The presentation Dr Frank gave stands on its own merits, it could have been presented by the Cookie Monster for all I care, data is data.
nobody is 100% right. it's okay to agree with some of someone's ideas. as long as you understand that, you don't have to be caught up in the personality clashes and bullshit drama. Trump even said get the vaccine, we all know that was bullshit. Let's stop picking icon's to worship and argue over.
Gotta be both I think. Audit and canvas would corroborate each other.
I'm getting a little disillusioned with Pulitzer. He seems pretty high on self-promotion. His rumble channel is nothing but short videos trying to send people to his locals channel.
If you keep looking into that drama, you’ll begin to question Jovan’s loyalty.
Or at least question his ability to put the Republic before his ego.
I still think too much of it is hidden.
Whoniz this?
The world needs their crimes put on full display for posterity. The people at large need public executions.
At least we were let in on the meeting after the fact, I don't know who Dr. Frank is, but if he is doing things behind the scenes then lets us know what transpired because of it--he is getting things accomplished. We don't know what anyone else may/or is doing at this moment, but what I do know is that not many have come forward to say because I did this, this happened and expect a lot more. We generally get crickets and are left to figure out what is going on and who is doing it.
Dr frank is a carpet bagger of the worst sort. He took someone elses data analysis and used it as his own.
Fuck him
And you know this how? What "someone"? What other "data analysis"? The standard of justice in this country is innocent until proven guilty. Accusation is not proof...but it is nearly perfect evidence of nothing.