43
Comments (9)
sorted by:
7
20-guage [S] 7 points ago +7 / -0

FTA

Joe Biden extended an eviction moratorium already deemed unconstitutional by the Supreme Court, so it would come as little surprise that President Norms would ignore the law going forward with his imperiled presidency. But Biden's latest blow in his campaign against the coronavirus isn't just a legal mess destined for endless court challenges; it's a logistical nightmare with little likelihood of doing anything other than further tightening the labor market and inflaming the sentiments of the vaccine-hesitant.

As a part of his umpteenth plan to stop the pandemic, the White House announced a series of vaccine requirements. Two of these, one for contractors with the federal government and another for healthcare workers at facilities funded by Medicare and Medicaid, seem kosher enough, legally speaking. But Biden's signature mandate is directed at the 80 million workers at private businesses with 100 or more employees.

"The Department of Labor’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) is developing a rule that will require all employers with 100 or more employees to ensure their workforce is fully vaccinated or require any workers who remain unvaccinated to produce a negative test result on at least a weekly basis before coming to work," the administration announced. "OSHA will issue an Emergency Temporary Standard (ETS) to implement this requirement."

That sound you hear is labor lawyers across the country licking their lips over the prospect of profits.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
1
20-guage [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

But they didn't "botch" AFG. It was INTENTIONAL. As soon as we realize that what they're doing is intentional, not "botched," all the Cognitive Dissonance disappears.

3
Duck_N_Cover 3 points ago +3 / -0

So I watched the whole 5pm address live. And there was one specific sentence that stood out instantly. It was the cadence and punctuation that made me think it was deliberate.

Go to the one sentence that starts at 25:25. https://youtu.be/IA2SCoYl8_U?t=1524 Listen to that and the one sentence that follows. The question is the words, "next month." It would be assumed that the "next month" was to start the second sentence. But the punctuation seems like it could end the first sentence.

That would make it: "As I recently released the key parts of my pandemic preparedness plan, so that America isn't caught flat-footed when a new pandemic comes again, AS IT WILL, Next month."

I've listened a few times and it is just odd. It can fit just as much on the tail end of the first sentence as it can the start of the next. May be nothing but a mumbling fool too. Just made me think of the satanic cabal needing to release their plans in advance as some sort of sick way of justifying what will come.

** Also the official wh video cut of this has a wierd nbs alert tone and bar display for the last minute and 1/2 of the video. Not sure why that wouldn't be edited out of youtube posting?

Sorry for the official wh link but you can also downvote while there.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
Donaldo2017 2 points ago +2 / -0

Seem to be hell bent on bringng down the economy.

3
20-guage [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yet another example of the Cobra Effect.** Guaranteed result when cognitively rigid central planners impose a top-down solution to a problem. Compounded by the fact that covid is a FAKE problem.

https://fee.org/articles/the-cobra-effect-lessons-in-unintended-consequences

** Unless, of course, bringing down the economy is INTENDED.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
3
20-guage [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

I just saw that Barnes Law is hiring, and a couple of other white hat firms -- if I hadn't been out of the game so long, I'd love to go back and draw some blood from the Beast.