It’s in Section 98! Here is a summary of the court piece we are discussing if you please. Section pages included in the summary. Also here is a copy of the court case, and legislation. And I sticky’d it. Is there a problem?
This court case is also noted in 117th Congress HR 1808, and S. 736 under the Assault Weapons Ban. Though the functionality of these pieces of legislation are in Congressional limbo.
From a commenter from 2020, “ Look up Ex Parte Milligan, 71 U.S. 2 (1866) for yourselves. the case determined it was unconstitutional to try civilians by military tribunal when civilian courts are still in operation.. it was brought about because the Courts refused to give the President at the time (Abraham Lincoln) the power of military commission jurisdiction so his administration could try and Punish Union dissenters during the Civil War. basically stating that Martial Law can not exist within the United States so long as the Civilian courts are open… it was argued before the US supreme court March 13th, 1866. It had nothing to do with the powers of government under a state of emergency.
basically this ruling only means that as civilians you can not be tried in military courts for protesting against the current situation, and that no US president will ever be able to declare martial law within the United States for any reason short of an actuall military invasion by a foreign entity.”
Yes. It’s a court case we are discussing. And a piece people are looking at for answers or reason. I still don’t see the problem against sticky-ing it for discussion or research. It’s a court case, not sovereign law. But it brings up a past point in history we are actually at now. And a point that Xiden has brought upon himself against We The People.
Do you understand why this was deleted? We are discussing a court case, not a piece of law. I made that abundantly clear. So to jump my shit in your mind’s perfection and then being disrespectful in that process will get your comments removed. Please try to be kinder, instead of jumping shit when things aren’t as perfect as you’d like. Because I can easily admit, I’m not perfect. But I do like a good discussion about historical pieces without the perfection Rheeees.
Maybe I missed it, but I don't recall in the post title or image that this is a case, it seemed to insinuate it was law.
Apologies, I wasn't trying to jump your shit and may have been a bit harsh but it was in the interest of attempts to maintain a certain level of info here. To avoid MSMish tactics by presenting partial facts, opinion, and misinformation as truth. Or law in this case lol.
Any who, so much posted here that gets away from Q and TGA, I've done it, and enjoy some of it, but I don't mind being "that guy"(from another post in the topic) when I see something that is dubious.
This is wrong and misinformation, if it isn't, than provide some sauce.
No where in the document is the above wording mentioned. Who stickies this garbage?!
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/71/2/
It’s in Section 98! Here is a summary of the court piece we are discussing if you please. Section pages included in the summary. Also here is a copy of the court case, and legislation. And I sticky’d it. Is there a problem?
https://www.johnnymelton.com/2020/04/23/ex-parte-milligan-71-u-s-2-1866/
https://constitution.org/1-Law/ussc/071-002a.htm
This court case is also noted in 117th Congress HR 1808, and S. 736 under the Assault Weapons Ban. Though the functionality of these pieces of legislation are in Congressional limbo.
From a commenter from 2020, “ Look up Ex Parte Milligan, 71 U.S. 2 (1866) for yourselves. the case determined it was unconstitutional to try civilians by military tribunal when civilian courts are still in operation.. it was brought about because the Courts refused to give the President at the time (Abraham Lincoln) the power of military commission jurisdiction so his administration could try and Punish Union dissenters during the Civil War. basically stating that Martial Law can not exist within the United States so long as the Civilian courts are open… it was argued before the US supreme court March 13th, 1866. It had nothing to do with the powers of government under a state of emergency.
basically this ruling only means that as civilians you can not be tried in military courts for protesting against the current situation, and that no US president will ever be able to declare martial law within the United States for any reason short of an actuall military invasion by a foreign entity.”
Yes. It’s a court case we are discussing. And a piece people are looking at for answers or reason. I still don’t see the problem against sticky-ing it for discussion or research. It’s a court case, not sovereign law. But it brings up a past point in history we are actually at now. And a point that Xiden has brought upon himself against We The People.
It’s a court case! Not a law! Re-read my last reply.
Do you understand why this was deleted? We are discussing a court case, not a piece of law. I made that abundantly clear. So to jump my shit in your mind’s perfection and then being disrespectful in that process will get your comments removed. Please try to be kinder, instead of jumping shit when things aren’t as perfect as you’d like. Because I can easily admit, I’m not perfect. But I do like a good discussion about historical pieces without the perfection Rheeees.
Maybe I missed it, but I don't recall in the post title or image that this is a case, it seemed to insinuate it was law.
Apologies, I wasn't trying to jump your shit and may have been a bit harsh but it was in the interest of attempts to maintain a certain level of info here. To avoid MSMish tactics by presenting partial facts, opinion, and misinformation as truth. Or law in this case lol.
Any who, so much posted here that gets away from Q and TGA, I've done it, and enjoy some of it, but I don't mind being "that guy"(from another post in the topic) when I see something that is dubious.
Peace out, God bless, and enjoy the weekend!