Unless they did a recent edit to that case, it doesn't say anything about this image. The entire case revolves around a prisoner of war . Unless I'm missing something when reading it.
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/71/2/
Maybe this is my ignorance speaking, but the use of all-caps, phrasing like "earn a living", and the overall format/presentation, all points to this being yet another half-assed "meme" and not any kind of real legal document.
agreed, that's why I searched for the formal case document to clarify, but at the same time I also first read it as just someone's personal interpretation of the case.
Unless they did a recent edit to that case, it doesn't say anything about this image. The entire case revolves around a prisoner of war . Unless I'm missing something when reading it. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/71/2/
Maybe this is my ignorance speaking, but the use of all-caps, phrasing like "earn a living", and the overall format/presentation, all points to this being yet another half-assed "meme" and not any kind of real legal document.
agreed, that's why I searched for the formal case document to clarify, but at the same time I also first read it as just someone's personal interpretation of the case.