17
posted ago by Red_Pill_Pusher_Man ago by Red_Pill_Pusher_Man +17 / -0

I did a quick search to see what Q had to say about Milley and found no results for him or for the chairman of the joint chiefs. I may have missed something but don't think I did. Thoughts on why Q would not have anything to say about the President's top military advisor? Maybe Milley is in on the sting and what we are being allowed to see now about Milley is the DS trying to shape a narrative before the damming stuff comes out. Try to make him the fall guy. On the surface Milley seems like a DS piece of shit but, Trump appointed him and Q never mentioned him. What makes a good movie? Great Actors. Not a Milley shill or a glowie - just tossing out the possibility and referring to the lack of Q drops on Milley to see what discussion develops.

Comments (21)
sorted by:
3
Red_Pill_Pusher_Man [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

Search for Milley in Q drops:

https://qalerts.app/?q=Milley

3
dty6 3 points ago +3 / -0

I don't know what to think yet about Milley. I don't trust Woodward, so there's that. Milley kind of seems like a set up but idk. We will wait a bit and see what develops.

6
Red_Pill_Pusher_Man [S] 6 points ago +6 / -0

Trump called the Milley story "Fake News" and "Fiction". That is what makes me think this Woodward release is the DS trying to shape the narrative before the real story is revealed.

2
Scorpion76 2 points ago +2 / -0

Searching for TREASON however throws up many dasting posts.

2
1Corporal 2 points ago +2 / -0

dam dude you ruined the movie.. I'm like still watch CA

2
PopcornTastesGood 2 points ago +2 / -0

There has been some stories saying milley was arrested for human sex trafficking in Asian, and forced to play ball. No great source or anything, just a theory

2
WaraBama 2 points ago +2 / -0

The part of Jeff Sessions will now be played by General Milley. Pass the popcorn 🍿

1
hippielouie 1 point ago +1 / -0

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
3
Red_Pill_Pusher_Man [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

And yet - Trump appointed to the position of chairman of the joint chiefs - why? If you know all of this, Trump knew all of this. I freely admit I have no clue what's going on - I'm throwing out alternate scenarios because what IS going on is most definitely NOT what the DS is putting out for us to believe.

https://qalerts.app/?q=Great+actors

There is always the possibility of alternate explanations.

Our military ran out of bullets under Gen. Milley’s watch. He had more than 5 years to address the problem publicly, but he didn’t say a word. He knew about it, but he kept his mouth shut. That’s dereliction of duty.

Maybe because nothing would have been done except him being fired by Obama. Look, I'm not defending Milley - the only thing I assume is that if we are being told about this obvious treason now it is because this story is the one the DS wants us to believe. You can believe their version if you want - Trump said it was all fiction - I'll believe Trump before I'll believe Woodward, thank you very much.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
Red_Pill_Pusher_Man [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Possible - but Trump could have just booted from the military like Obama did to the 270 you mentioned in your post.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
Red_Pill_Pusher_Man [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Sentence structure matters. From Trumps statement:

** If the story of “Dumbass” General Mark Milley**...yada, yada,yada...is true, then I assume....

Next paragraph of his statement begins:

The good news is that the story is Fake news concocted by a weak and ineffective General together with two authors who I refused to give an interview to because they write fiction, not fact.

Trump is telling us that Woodward is full of shit and this never happened.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
dty6 1 point ago +1 / -0

Question - are you saying that the military running out of bullets under Obama was dereliction of duty, or failing to report it to the public was dereliction of duty?

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
dty6 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm asking you to clarify your dereliction of duty statement. I'm not familiar with this part.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0