437
Comments (56)
sorted by:
39
UnderCoverTrumper 39 points ago +39 / -0

It looks like they ARE recommending it for people 65 or older. My guess is they just want to slow walk it out while they kill off old people, which people will write off as "they were old."

19
MakeAmericaWinAgain 19 points ago +19 / -0

Less strain off social security

6
tstr 6 points ago +6 / -0

SS is broke in like 10 years. Next it will be 55 and older to try to get those who will receive in the next 10 or so years.

7
UndercoverFBIguy 7 points ago +7 / -0

Haven’t they been saying it’s going broke in 10 years for like 30 years now

2
alphaliberal 2 points ago +2 / -0

Clinton fixed the fund in 1997, then Bush took the trillion surplus and handed out those measly $300 checks in 2001 or 2002....

1
tstr 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah but Fed has been printing like mad too. We are reaching a point where they can't do that anymore and have it be effective.

3
LiquidRitz 3 points ago +3 / -0

Way till the real number of Elderly killed comes to light.

Then when voter fraud is exposed and all the dead voters happened to be collecting social security too...

Might buy us a few more years.

5
Crunchy_Bites 5 points ago +5 / -0

pensions are expensive.

2
mac1221 2 points ago +2 / -0

Targeting the ones on pensions and social security.

2
CirclebackGinger 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think they will start with the elderly and “high risk” just like they did in the beginning. It gives them the ability to chalk up the deaths happening to age just like you said or “well, they DID have cancer so that’s what really killed them in the end.” Its a lot harder to explain away a bunch of young people dying who have nothing wrong with them. Better to give the 3rd shot to the elderly and high risk first so as not to cause any alarm bells to go off prematurely. Then they’ll start the narrative up again that young people are getting sick and need the 3rd shot. It’s literally “Covid shots 2.0”.

1
UnderCoverTrumper 1 point ago +1 / -0

Agreed. I'm trying to talk my parents out of the booster. They are coming to help out with our baby (supposed to arrive any day) and want to get it (and a flu shot) to protect the baby. No. No. No.

1
Jacurutu99 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ah, the Cuomo method.

15
SoundsGood 15 points ago +15 / -0

So will the White House do like they always do and ignore this medical recommendation as well ?

9
wQkeAF 9 points ago +9 / -0

That would actually be amazing to watch - and we could use a few more redpill moabs for good measure!

Because I think that would finally get even more of the hardcore lefties to question wtf is going on.

12
swimkin 12 points ago +12 / -0

So basically they want to kill off the seniors

4
SodOffLiberals 4 points ago +4 / -0

Seniors are the ones who remember how things used to be. They remember life in the old days, before Kennedy was killed, when America really was first. Can't have those people running around telling tall tales.

2
KickingPugilist 2 points ago +2 / -0

And the pension funds that they won't want to pay out as they pass multi trillion dollar bills for nothing of meaning.

1
Wtf_socialismreally 1 point ago +1 / -0

Seniors are also the most likely to trust mainstream media however because they've trusted them for years.

9
WakeUpWorld 9 points ago +9 / -0

I thought the FDA has not approved the Pfizer vaccine everyone is taking and the one they did is not distributed until 2024? Why would they be approving boosters when they have not approved the vaccine? Also do you see the Fuckery they have going on at the end about not any serious injuries from the vax.

3
ProphetOfKek 3 points ago +3 / -0

EUA booster approval.

8
PaNix 8 points ago +8 / -0

My first thought was they want to kill off everyone on social security

7
electricboogaloo 7 points ago +7 / -0

Yeah yeah, they are doing the old flip flop. Let everyone feel relieved and comply with the vax mandates now. If they can get to critical mass on % vaxxed they reintro boosters. It’s a game.

1
TardedButNotDeparted 1 point ago +1 / -0

Agreed. They're lying. This is temporary. Boosters will be forced regardless if they only work 12 days or not at all.

3
KickingPugilist 3 points ago +3 / -0

Why boaters? Because they have accidents that lose guns?

7
ditzee58 7 points ago +7 / -0

Code for "We want more money, Pfizer."

3
Crunchy_Bites 3 points ago +3 / -0

But But But they are safe, why not take a booster for an additional 12 days of semi-protection? How dare they prevent us from being safe and protected. I say all people simply tell the pharmacies that it is their first dose and keep getting them every 12 days. It is for the common good and we all must be safe and protect each other, Unlimited shots for everyone.

2
Positive-Court 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's no different than ly of ng about ab 11 year olds age.

1
KickingPugilist 1 point ago +1 / -0

From what I remember the 12 day thing isn't as you think it is.

1
Crunchy_Bites 1 point ago +1 / -0

what are you anti-science? The vax helps for 12 days, it you die after 12 days, it was not due to the vax because it was too far out.

1
KickingPugilist 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well anything before 14 days after 2nd shot is unvaxxed death XD

1
Crunchy_Bites 1 point ago +1 / -0

and everything after 14 days was not due to the vax, nice scam right there with the data.

1
KickingPugilist 1 point ago +1 / -0

But everything is a covid death! Bing Bing Bong bong

https://youtu.be/oguvSPdtHQ8

1
Crunchy_Bites 1 point ago +1 / -0

Worst cases of covid death I have ever seen. Amazing how covid could have caused all those drivers to die just moments before that massive car crash pileup on I-74. Just tragic. Perhaps we should mandate all drivers receive two boosters.

3
PaNix 3 points ago +3 / -0

This actually sucks because my dad man. I couldn't convince him not to get the shots. Lucky for me he had no adverse reactions, praying he got saline. Is that crazy to ask since we live in the suburbs? Maybe if a community has money they give the shots that won't make you sick if indeed they are different batches. Anyway he is 64 and based on the past I feel as if he will want to get it. Its weird with him. I think he falls into a category where he has just given up.its sad.

3
ARandomOgre 3 points ago +5 / -2

So is this showing that the FDA is, in fact, doing its due diligence on this stuff? Or is this just considered a random fluke in a string of otherwise corrupt decisions regarding the vaccine?

10
MakeAmericaWinAgain 10 points ago +10 / -0

Probably realizing it’ll push the people beyond the breaking point. People are already awaking to the fact that it wont ever ago away 3, 4, 20 vaccines later.

3
ProphetOfKek 3 points ago +3 / -0

Nah they are waiting til they “get more data” to make it seem like they are being reasonable when they roll out recs for quarterly vaccinations.

3
ARandomOgre 3 points ago +4 / -1

FWIW, I’m not under the impression it’ll ever go away. I imagine it’ll end up like the flu, where we get a shot every year. Possibly even packaged into the flu shot, although that’ll only happen if they’re either willing to mandate the flu shot (since it’ll be combined) or stop mandating the Covid shot. We’ll see.

7
thorsdisciple 7 points ago +7 / -0

Are you asking so you know which narrative you're supposed to argue for or against?

1
ARandomOgre 1 point ago +2 / -1

I’m asking because I’m interested in your thoughts.

2
escapefromearth 2 points ago +2 / -0

Could be they want to avoid what we are seeing out of Israel or it might jolt the sheep from their zombie slumber. Killing off the old won't alarm anyone to the boosters, then they'll promote it to the rest of the population while blaming the die off of the elderly on a new "covid strain" even though it was the boosters. Considering this was their play when it all started, looks like they feel safe continuing with the play that worked for them.

2
TardedButNotDeparted 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's a ploy. They need to reel back the anger against the possibility of boosters every 6 months. People who got fully vaxxed started saying they won't do boosters.

So now they give people some false hope.

And in a few months, oh look, boosters are ready for the general public... and a new horrible strain has appeared, so everyone will need to take shot #3!

Don't believe anything that they do is permanent.

Until they are arrested, prosecuted, and executed for treason, this fight will never be over.

1
BringTheCat789 1 point ago +1 / -0

I am nearly 100% confident that this decision was based primarily on the boosters effect on "public confidence in the vaccine."

That is: they don't want to push boosters now because people will use this rejection to discredit "conspiracy theorists" who say there will be endless boosters if we give in to the tyranny. And many people on the fence who don't want the vaccine if they think they'll be required to keep taking it for it to remain effective will get it when they see this firm rejection.

However, I am nearly 100% confident that once a larger percentage of the population is vaccinated, they will announce the need for boosters for everyone. And the cycle will begin anew.

1
GoGoOptomistic 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wow did they grow a set?

2
GoGoOptomistic 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nah ...

2
Cpleb 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think they just feel like the booster will wake up too many sheep. They want to target the unvaxed first. Once that pop is small enough then they’ll roll out another muh variant and then need boosters for reg plebs

2
Crunchy_Bites 2 points ago +2 / -0

covid brain confusion.

2
TardedButNotDeparted 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nope, temporary, they will flip-flop by November.

1
Ssue1216 1 point ago +1 / -0

Please archive. Let’s not give these scumbags click revenue

1
Snowgirl1965 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wow.... This is HUGE!

1
KickingPugilist 1 point ago +1 / -0

Always ask why. Probably not what you think.

1
Jackdagger 1 point ago +1 / -0

"The case for killing granny" from the Obama and Bill gates days rings a bell

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
0
4morebeersx2 0 points ago +1 / -1

I care for the infirm elderly, and have had Pfizer. The injection site was really painful for 3 or 4 days. I care less about my welfare than that of my residents.

-1
MYPillowHurts -1 points ago +1 / -2

This is incorrect. If you are 65 or over and are obese, have high blood pressure, diabetes, heart disease, immunosuppressive, etc you can get a booster per the FDA announcement today.

1
broward 1 point ago +1 / -0

when did the FDA approve suicide?