559
Comments (60)
sorted by:
11
Vagrant 11 points ago +11 / -0

Is this official?

19
8
killacommieforyourmo 8 points ago +8 / -0

Why does it say updated July 8th?

7
Vagrant 7 points ago +7 / -0

Presumably they edited something on the page on that date. It may be waybacked to see what the change was, but I kind of doubt it.

17
Lopeover 17 points ago +17 / -0

So they approved this and didn’t tell anyone? Why couldn’t doctors prescribe or pharmacies fill it?

22
Vagrant 22 points ago +22 / -0

Exactly. Doctors and nurses were threatened with being fired for even mentioning it, management had to be sued in some instances to be forced to provide it, every single person who was murdered with vents and remdesivir could have been saved. This is mass murder.

16
UncleHooly 16 points ago +17 / -1

because they dont want you to have it

theyre using ivermectin on the vaccinated to pretend the vaccination works

everyone else is getting remdesivir and ventilators which kills.

2
Lopeover 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes, I saw the video of the nurse from Australia telling how they are giving ivermectin to the double vaxxxed and letting the unvaxxxed succumb. They want Australians to think the vaxxx is working. Despicable.

6
JizmJunky 6 points ago +6 / -0

EUA requires there are no other treatments. Now that they have "full approval...."

10
tenthousandspoons 10 points ago +10 / -0

The EUA was illegal from the beginning.

5
DemonDMT [S] 5 points ago +5 / -0

They are told they will lose their job.

2
MAG768720 2 points ago +2 / -0

If you are politically connected, you go to Hospital A. Everybody else goes to Hospital B.

Hospital A = standard of care is Ivermecting, HCQ

Hospital B = standard of care is Remdesivir, Ventilators

See how it works?

Both are "authorized use" standard of care. But two different sets of rules to achieve two different outcomes.

1
Lopeover 1 point ago +1 / -0

The general population doesn’t know which is the “good” treatment hospital. Keeping this information quiet is complicit. Unfortunately many medical workers are corrupted and/or cowards.

1
DemonDMT [S] 1 point ago +2 / -1

We might have to plan ahead and ask the hospitals what are their SOPs for covid treatment. There are tons of good hospitals out there that don't want to kill people for money.

2
ModernMan1 2 points ago +2 / -0

At the very bottom of the page it says last updated Sept 15th.

Hmmm

1
AquaEyes777 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why do they have all of these other quiet posts to their website about tests not working, serious side effects, ineffectiveness, death rates, etc. and no one covers it in the MSN and they sure aren't going to draw attention to their quiet admissions.

5
Vagrant 5 points ago +5 / -0

holy shit...

1
PhDinNY 1 point ago +1 / -0

when I search "ivermectin approved by NIH" with duckduckgo, only links that stated it wasn't approved by NIH or FDA showed up. Thanks for this link! I want to post to FB and say, "for all you people who thought ivermectin was just some right-wing conspiracy theory" :)

2
PhDinNY 2 points ago +2 / -0

I reviewed the one completed study that you can link to. It was a pretty small sample size, with only a marginally better mortality result than the "control" group. I don't know if it was intended to mask the effectiveness of the ivermectin, but they included hydroxychloroquine as part of the treatment of the "control" group! "Hydroxychloroquine, favipiravir and azithromycin (HFA) standard treatment protocol were given to the control group as recommended in the "COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2 Infection) Guide" prepared by the Republic of Turkey Ministry of Health." Since when is hydroxychloroquine considered standard treatment? To be a true test of ivermectin, they should have compared it to the standard treatment in U.S. hospitals, or at least a treatment that doesn't include another drug that is controversial, as far as U.S. medical professionals go.

1
bubble_bursts 1 point ago +1 / -0

I saw that too, and I came to the same conclusion - comparing HCQ to Ivermectin, saying niether does better than the other, and denying both.

But there are lot other studies at c19ivermectin.com

9
Tellstruth 9 points ago +9 / -0

DR. ARDIS: THE MEDICAL INDUSTRY IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ‘COVID’ DEATHS, NOT VIRUS https://www.bitchute.com/video/Chf8zg6Fl1fS/

Dr. Bryan Ardis joins Owen Shroyer live in studio to break down how the medical industry in killing more people through toxic treatments and vaccines than the COVID virus itself.

6
AngelCole 6 points ago +6 / -0

Ok, ya'll I have my first refusal of remdesivir patient, yahoo!! I also saw my first influenza b patient recently. I think it's breaking through the matrix.

1
MAG768720 1 point ago +1 / -0

Are you a doctor or nurse?

When was the last time you say an influenza patient?

Has influenza been tested for all this time?

6
Demijinx 6 points ago +6 / -0

Im confused how this works, is this approval for use by the NIH, or all US doctors? Does the FDA approve the use or just the drug?

2
bubble_bursts 2 points ago +2 / -0

I am guessing this is approved only for folks working in NIH /s

4
mastaxn 4 points ago +4 / -0

So too be clear. The only drug on this table that is EUA is remdesivir. Ivermectin is not EUA. So you can demand it, but they already have that base covered.

7
GaIIowBoob 7 points ago +7 / -0

EUA is for drugs that are not approved for human consumption. IVM has been approved for humans for a long time.

1
mastaxn 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's half true. EUA is for using drugs off-label, or not yet FDA approved, to treat a specific disease when there is no existing available treatment for that disease.

1
MAG768720 1 point ago +1 / -0

Does any clinical trial exist for Remdesivir to be used specifically for Covid19/SARS-CoV-2?

1
GaIIowBoob 1 point ago +1 / -0

You don't need EUA for off label use. For example HCQ has been off label covid recommended most if this year without an EUA.

2
mastaxn 2 points ago +2 / -0

Okay. Yeah. You're right. Off-label doesn't need EUA. So the only reason they're preventing it from being used is to make sure people die... Sick.

3
ReticulatingSplines 3 points ago +3 / -0

Nice find. 👍👌👊

3
SuckaFree 3 points ago +3 / -0

And RDV is ONLY EUA'd for COVID. Now it all makes sense.

3
DarQ2light 3 points ago +3 / -0

Is it approved or under evaluation?

2
imannoyed 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's gotta be under evaluation, because this page says it's "not approved by the FDA for the treatment of any viral infection". https://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/therapies/antiviral-therapy/ivermectin/

1
DarQ2light 1 point ago +1 / -0

Good enough for me. Clowns can say what they want when it's curing the most populated country on earth.

3
GoGoOptomistic 3 points ago +3 / -0

Wow finally!

4
GoGoOptomistic 4 points ago +4 / -0

Since this drug is already FDA approved this should push it up in line as a approved treatment!

2
SeladorSmirh 2 points ago +2 / -0

The NIH and the FDA don’t necessarily draw the same conclusion and without more from the FDA I wouldn’t read too much into it

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
Snowgirl1965 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's got to be the WHO that is directing doctors and hospitals to keep this info hidden. 😡😡😡

1
FreeinFL2020 1 point ago +1 / -0

NIH does not have the authority to approve drugs

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
queue-anon 1 point ago +1 / -0

lovedone?

1
Jagerman2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Loved one…… Typo 😉

1
Jagerman2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Loved one … Typo 😉

1
DumbGrunt 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is also on the NIH website. Obviously big pharma doesn't want us crumb eaters to have it, but how long can they keep withholding the info? https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34466270/

1
PhDinNY 1 point ago +1 / -0

It appears that ivermectin falls under the category of "under evaluation", based on there only being one completed study listed, but I could be wrong. That study is highly suspect, if you read through the summary. Hydroxychloroquine was given to the "control" group!

1
FaithfulVAPatriot 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wow! Thanks for posting this!

1
My2SonsAreMarines 1 point ago +1 / -0

Of course Ivermectin is still under evaluation, because Pfizer has not gotten their expensive version of of ivermectin approved by FDA yet, but it is coming.

1
QuantumRemedy 1 point ago +1 / -0

It says "or under evaluation".

Did I miss something? This isn't clear that it's authorized, right?

1
qeratdemonstrandum 1 point ago +1 / -0

Looks like it's only under evaluation per the last column (Comments and Links to Clinical Trials). Though it doesn't say explicitly that it's not approved. Still a win though!

1
winn 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ok so this takes care of the lungs once the virus has ravaged them, but how about approving HCQ and zinc for knockin out the viral replication? thx NIH!

1
DemonDMT [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ivy knocks out replication too.

1
winn 1 point ago +1 / -0

I thought it was for the lung infection part and hcq/zinc did that