There are 3 other studies where the authors were asked the same question and all three said they were not able to identify the purification level of the virus they were looking at. I was thinking the person I was responding to had an ancillary study that wasn’t one of those 4 studies.
I’ve looked into the “no isolated virus” theory. The PCR tests are stupid bc like the article you quoted, all it does is look for a specific known sequence in the viral genome. It could be only 4 bases long and therefore it would match with the “virus” and almost anything else hence why it can’t differentiate between flu and other coronaviruses.
However the “no isolated virus theory” always focuses on no virus has ever been isolated “pure without using cell cultures or reagents”. But viruses cannot replicate on their own, they always need a host cell. Virus by itself are not technically “alive” so be default they would need some medium ie a cell culture line for it to replicate on. They (the alt news) always focuses on the “no cell culture” angle. I’m not convinced that it’s true.
Personal opinion, but I think the whole no isolated virus is misinformation to make us look dumb.
It makes more sense that it was a regular coronavirus altered by gain of function. I suspect the virus was either not as contagious as they originally planned or it got weakened by white hats or it couldn’t survive on its own and has to be injected (via the vaccine) etc. They used the PCR to fake a pandemic and usher in tyrannical measures.
They get a sample from a person and then they sequence it. I suppose you could call it an isolation prior to sequencing. Samples are continually being sent in for sequencing from all over the world. They continually monitor to see how the genetic code has changed and how it has changed in its behavior.
Well that's a REALLY pretty computer generated picture of what they're "calling" covid. We're looking for the actual isolated sample that wasn't contaminated by any other chemicals during the "isolation process". AKA "Purified sample."
"Over a year ago, I proposed (insisted on) a procedure to prove SARS-COV-2 exists.
This procedure is essential—and needless to say, it hasn’t been done, and will never be done.
Why? Because the outcome could completely and utterly destroy the COVID narrative.
Here is the procedure: You line up 500 people who have been diagnosed with COVID-19, and you take tissue samples from them.
You properly process these samples, through centrifuging, etc., in order to extract and arrive at what you believe is the virus.
You put that material under an electron microscope and photograph it.
You then place the 500 photos from the 500 “pandemic patients” side by side.
You ask yourself three burning questions.
One: In each and every photo, are there many identical viruses?
Two: Are these viruses in every one of the 500 photos?
Three: Is the virus one you’ve never seen before?
If the answer to question one and two is yes, you appear to have found a common virus for the 500 patients. If the answer to three is yes, it’s a virus never seen before.
If the answer to either question one or two is no, you’ve failed to find the common virus you’re looking for. You’ve failed to prove a viral cause for what you’re calling COVID-19.
If you see many identical virus particles in some, but not all, of the photos, you may or may not have found a virus. To decide that issue, you need three conditions: the researchers are honest and independent; a new team of such researchers will repeat the whole procedure, from the beginning, to see whether their findings match those of the original team; and you need truly qualified experts to determine whether the particles in the electron microscope photos are actually viruses or something else.
Note: This is why one or two photos from a study mean NOTHING.
All right. Moving on, there are other factors involved in the process of discovering a virus. These factors are ISOLATION and GENETIC SEQUENCING.
They’re both covered in a Statement on Virus Isolation, authored and published by Dr. Andrew Kaufman, Dr. Tom Cowan, and Sally Fallon Morell."
Where was this isolation published? Can you provide source here for analysis, please?
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7036342/
Ah, yes. The Wan Beom Park et al. Study done in mid March 2020.
Dr Wan Beom Park, when asked if his electron-micrographs show a purified isolate, responded:
“We did not obtain an electron micrograph showing the degree of purification.”
IOW, they weren’t working with a purified (isolated) virus.
https://off-guardian.org/2020/06/27/covid19-pcr-tests-are-scientifically-meaningless/
There are 3 other studies where the authors were asked the same question and all three said they were not able to identify the purification level of the virus they were looking at. I was thinking the person I was responding to had an ancillary study that wasn’t one of those 4 studies.
I’ve looked into the “no isolated virus” theory. The PCR tests are stupid bc like the article you quoted, all it does is look for a specific known sequence in the viral genome. It could be only 4 bases long and therefore it would match with the “virus” and almost anything else hence why it can’t differentiate between flu and other coronaviruses.
However the “no isolated virus theory” always focuses on no virus has ever been isolated “pure without using cell cultures or reagents”. But viruses cannot replicate on their own, they always need a host cell. Virus by itself are not technically “alive” so be default they would need some medium ie a cell culture line for it to replicate on. They (the alt news) always focuses on the “no cell culture” angle. I’m not convinced that it’s true.
Personal opinion, but I think the whole no isolated virus is misinformation to make us look dumb.
It makes more sense that it was a regular coronavirus altered by gain of function. I suspect the virus was either not as contagious as they originally planned or it got weakened by white hats or it couldn’t survive on its own and has to be injected (via the vaccine) etc. They used the PCR to fake a pandemic and usher in tyrannical measures.
I can appreciate that perspective.
Here is the entire genome for Covid: https://i.redd.it/nmbbrs31r3h41.png
This is also illustrative. It shows the development of mutations over time. https://static.scientificamerican.com/sciam/assets/Image/saw0620Gscipanzoom.jpg
They get a sample from a person and then they sequence it. I suppose you could call it an isolation prior to sequencing. Samples are continually being sent in for sequencing from all over the world. They continually monitor to see how the genetic code has changed and how it has changed in its behavior.
Well that's a REALLY pretty computer generated picture of what they're "calling" covid. We're looking for the actual isolated sample that wasn't contaminated by any other chemicals during the "isolation process". AKA "Purified sample."
If you had a purified sample how would you know it wasn't just salt?
They do this with very small samples. That's how they know what they have.
"Over a year ago, I proposed (insisted on) a procedure to prove SARS-COV-2 exists.
This procedure is essential—and needless to say, it hasn’t been done, and will never be done.
Why? Because the outcome could completely and utterly destroy the COVID narrative.
Here is the procedure: You line up 500 people who have been diagnosed with COVID-19, and you take tissue samples from them.
You properly process these samples, through centrifuging, etc., in order to extract and arrive at what you believe is the virus.
You put that material under an electron microscope and photograph it.
You then place the 500 photos from the 500 “pandemic patients” side by side.
You ask yourself three burning questions.
One: In each and every photo, are there many identical viruses?
Two: Are these viruses in every one of the 500 photos?
Three: Is the virus one you’ve never seen before?
If the answer to question one and two is yes, you appear to have found a common virus for the 500 patients. If the answer to three is yes, it’s a virus never seen before.
If the answer to either question one or two is no, you’ve failed to find the common virus you’re looking for. You’ve failed to prove a viral cause for what you’re calling COVID-19.
If you see many identical virus particles in some, but not all, of the photos, you may or may not have found a virus. To decide that issue, you need three conditions: the researchers are honest and independent; a new team of such researchers will repeat the whole procedure, from the beginning, to see whether their findings match those of the original team; and you need truly qualified experts to determine whether the particles in the electron microscope photos are actually viruses or something else.
Note: This is why one or two photos from a study mean NOTHING.
All right. Moving on, there are other factors involved in the process of discovering a virus. These factors are ISOLATION and GENETIC SEQUENCING.
They’re both covered in a Statement on Virus Isolation, authored and published by Dr. Andrew Kaufman, Dr. Tom Cowan, and Sally Fallon Morell."
https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021/09/20/the-failure-to-prove-the-virus-exists/