I don't expect any one state to remove Joe Biden. Arizona taken out wouldn't remove enough electors. On the other hand, I do expect decertification from enough would be enough to create a sizable constitutional crisis, and spark a power struggle with the Federal government. I don't believe the SCOTUS has ANY place touching this; they certainly do not have authority to remove a sitting president.
If our constitutional roadmap is any guideline, there would be three significant ways of removing Biden.
1.) Congress. Impeachment. HIGHLY doubt that will happen, and if it doesn't it won't be over this.
2.) The rest of the executive branch tossing him out. Not really sure what that would be like, but I can see it happening and making a degree of logic. We're talking about a military usurpation here.
3.) States. Most of the abilities of the legislative branch are also held in some manner by the states themselves, directly. It would not be unreasonable to suppose that they could take action of a variety of kinds to effectively bypass congress and have proper constitutional authority; I mean, at the least (though this is a stretch), they have the power to amend the constitution without congressional involvement.
I don't personally see removal of Biden through de-certification alone either. No way in hell they'd just let it work like that. But that's not really what I want anyway; what I think we need is the power struggle itself; the decertification, the branding of illegitimacy. The value here is almost moreso in the fight than the chance of victory through those means alone.
One thing that is incredibly important to remember for all of us, that is so easily to forget, is that this is just one battle of a much much larger war. Wars aren't one by sending forces to only attack one objective at a time, until they get to the final objective. It's won by coordinating assaults across the front and providing support one battle to another. This is just one front we need to continue pressuring and forcing as much as possible; there are other fronts that need victory as well, and, God willing, by the time they all get to the final objectives, they'll be strong enough and united enough to achieve complete victory.
Agreed, the branding of illegitimacy is still valuable even if Biden isn't removed. Winning the support of the people and avoiding civil war was always a main priority of the white hats.
I think impeachment is the most realistic path based on Durham's findings. Remember, Biden was the last name of those who illegally unmasked Trump campaign members who were spied on. That alone won't justify impeachment, but it will provide Durham with warrants to investigate other crimes by Biden involving China and Ukraine that pair with emails from Hunter's laptop. Once those crimes are revealed, and the public regard him as illegitimate, their will be demand across the board for his impeachment.
I don't expect any one state to remove Joe Biden. Arizona taken out wouldn't remove enough electors. On the other hand, I do expect decertification from enough would be enough to create a sizable constitutional crisis, and spark a power struggle with the Federal government. I don't believe the SCOTUS has ANY place touching this; they certainly do not have authority to remove a sitting president.
If our constitutional roadmap is any guideline, there would be three significant ways of removing Biden.
1.) Congress. Impeachment. HIGHLY doubt that will happen, and if it doesn't it won't be over this.
2.) The rest of the executive branch tossing him out. Not really sure what that would be like, but I can see it happening and making a degree of logic. We're talking about a military usurpation here.
3.) States. Most of the abilities of the legislative branch are also held in some manner by the states themselves, directly. It would not be unreasonable to suppose that they could take action of a variety of kinds to effectively bypass congress and have proper constitutional authority; I mean, at the least (though this is a stretch), they have the power to amend the constitution without congressional involvement.
I don't personally see removal of Biden through de-certification alone either. No way in hell they'd just let it work like that. But that's not really what I want anyway; what I think we need is the power struggle itself; the decertification, the branding of illegitimacy. The value here is almost moreso in the fight than the chance of victory through those means alone.
One thing that is incredibly important to remember for all of us, that is so easily to forget, is that this is just one battle of a much much larger war. Wars aren't one by sending forces to only attack one objective at a time, until they get to the final objective. It's won by coordinating assaults across the front and providing support one battle to another. This is just one front we need to continue pressuring and forcing as much as possible; there are other fronts that need victory as well, and, God willing, by the time they all get to the final objectives, they'll be strong enough and united enough to achieve complete victory.
Agreed, the branding of illegitimacy is still valuable even if Biden isn't removed. Winning the support of the people and avoiding civil war was always a main priority of the white hats.
I think impeachment is the most realistic path based on Durham's findings. Remember, Biden was the last name of those who illegally unmasked Trump campaign members who were spied on. That alone won't justify impeachment, but it will provide Durham with warrants to investigate other crimes by Biden involving China and Ukraine that pair with emails from Hunter's laptop. Once those crimes are revealed, and the public regard him as illegitimate, their will be demand across the board for his impeachment.