It's just always interesting how there's a common tendency to look at paternal bloodlines as opposed to material. Joseph was Jesus' legal father, connecting him to the line of David, but Mary's lineage was recorded seemingly for a reason. I'll have to look back through my notes as to that importance. The important thing was that through Mary, Jesus was fully human (from her genetic strands) but there because there was no male human DNA passed to Jesus, just the incarnation, He was also fully God. Bringing up this example is just a thought that if we spend more time looking at maternal lines, it adds more to the story. All the talk about Hussein's family, but not so much Big Mike's deeply rooted Chicago family. And even with Hussein's family, all the focus is on the alleged father (I still contend it was Frank Marshal Davis), but not the mother's side with Dunham's alleged work with the CIA post-WWII. When comes to JFK it's all about the Kennedy clan, but not so much about Jackie's family. Wonder what can be taken away by going back through the Bouviers history. Perhaps it wasn't Jack or the Kennedys as sometimes alleged, that were tied to the NWO/illuminati/cabal etc, but Jackie? Perhaps because of JFK's rise, Jackie was planted to take that ticket to DC power? Check out how far left their daughter went, and how they are raising JFK's sole remaining heir (if we assume JFK Jr. is actually dead).... Could it be that they needed to get rid of Jr. to clear the path for a more controllable Kennedy? Idk... just rambling thoughts