714
posted ago by MAG768720 ago by MAG768720 +715 / -1

The case had to do with flu vaxx, but court ruled that a vaxx cannot be required because it violates informed consent.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/U8UwbcENxRy5/

Comments (73)
sorted by:
55
Brent75 55 points ago +55 / -0

That is a win our friends Down Under Needs!!

12
VoatAnon1984 12 points ago +12 / -0

And now we are facing it in Florida.

9
CQVFEFE 9 points ago +9 / -0

Hold fast, anon. Gov DeSantis is on our side in this it looks like so far anyway.

5
Casualize 5 points ago +5 / -0

Do tell, I was lining a job up there to escape my current mandate.

0
VoatAnon1984 0 points ago +2 / -2

Very large company with Federal defense contracts. It is also being pushed in a friend’s job that is considered critical infrastructure health related work. Sorry for the vague response, I’d like to limit my metadata output.

3
Casualize 3 points ago +3 / -0

That's fine, I just was under the assumption that you were referencing Florida as a whole. That's what threw me off because I couldn't find anything in specific.

2
VoatAnon1984 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don’t know what you would find. It’s happening internally. The media isn’t interested in cover any of this topic. There are word of mouth reports of it happening in hospitals and medical manufacturing plants here as well.

1
HeartofStone 1 point ago +1 / -0

Where? My employer in FL just made it a requirement prior to employment but doesn’t apply to existing employees. I got in in the nick of time

35
anon3030 35 points ago +35 / -0

Great. Now do USA.

29
650Thunderbolt 29 points ago +29 / -0

And Canada.

20
VaccinesCauseSIDS 20 points ago +20 / -0

And Italy

13
deleted 13 points ago +13 / -0
12
Forthelead 12 points ago +12 / -0

How does informed consent not apply to the testing, which is also a medical procedure?

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
8
mechdork 8 points ago +8 / -0

That's awesome! Whenever you're ready to take a couple weeks off just swab a grapefruit and boom covid positive!

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
4
Forthelead 4 points ago +4 / -0

If you administer the test yourself, you are clearly complying, but is the compliance free of coercion?

That is the entire problem here. Many people have complied with the injection without informed consent (seemingly everyone since they are not forthcoming with information about adverse reactions), and many others have been coerced into taking it.

Informed consent free of coercion should also apply to the testing since it is an invasion of your body that puts you in contact with a chemical substance (it is not just a Q-tip they use to collect the sample)

0
UncleHooly 0 points ago +2 / -2

No it is not. You are still being forced to comply and if you dont you will be penalized.

Thata coercion.

0
UncleHooly 0 points ago +1 / -1

Absolutely is.

People who work in testing labs have training to do so.

Someone who has training can use the exact same test to prove someone has chickenpox and are NOW infectious despite having it 30 years ago and not even knowing it

5
CQVFEFE 5 points ago +5 / -0

I know, right? No one is going to sinus-fuck me with one of those damn vaulting poles with the cotton-and-spike-protein tip.

5
DrMcCoy 5 points ago +5 / -0

Article: COVID PCR Test Swabs are as dangerous as inhaling Asbestos

An experimental physicist and bio-materials researcher examined various PCR test swabs under a microscope and found that the fibres they contain are as dangerous for human beings as inhaling asbestos.

Professor Antonietta Gatti examined various PCR test swabs and analysed their ingredients. The results showed that they are made of tough materials and contain a large number of nano-particles including silver, aluminum, titanium, and glass fibres. All of which are not declared on the PCR test package insert. https://lichtnahrung2015.wordpress.com/2021/05/21/covid-pcr-test-swabs-are-as-dangerous-as-inhaling-asbestos/

4
TheBRAINz 4 points ago +4 / -0

FYI - weekly testing is also illegal based on 2015 Federal law that protects a person's "genetic" information. PCR test uses genetic information.

https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/G-2.5/page-1.html

Prohibitions Marginal note:Genetic test

3 (1) It is prohibited for any person to require an individual to undergo a genetic test as a condition of

(a) providing goods or services to that individual;

(b) entering into or continuing a contract or agreement with that individual; or

(c) offering or continuing specific terms or conditions in a contract or agreement with that individual.

8
ElkStatue 8 points ago +8 / -0

Even if this doesn't count as legal precedent for other countries, it seems like it would serve as a legal pattern? If this is deemed illegal in Australia, it should be deemed illegal elsewhere for the same reasons?

4
Nasty_Savage 4 points ago +4 / -0

I would think that if they are citing ‘informed consent’ that it refers to basic Nuremburg code which is international. I notice they are requiring people in NY to waive informed consent (if you go the testing route), which can be revoked in writing at any time. Its super fishy…

27
deleted 27 points ago +27 / -0
5
ProphetOfKek 5 points ago +6 / -1

Nobody cares about Nuremberg code anymore. They don’t care about our federal/state laws either.

6
Mcmurdo32 6 points ago +6 / -0

They'll care when they are subjected to it when this is all over and they face an accounting by the people.

4
ProphetOfKek 4 points ago +4 / -0

True

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
Mcmurdo32 2 points ago +2 / -0

It will, because the Globalists will not stop oppressing people. They will eventually reach a point at which the people will not be able to take it anymore and will resist. The Globalists just don't have the numbers to fend off a mass Awakening. Question is: At what point is this?

20
bubble_bursts 20 points ago +20 / -0

Yesterday it was Fair Work Australia, today its Australian Courts.

I feel terrible for all my folks who jumped the gun because "we will lose our jobs if we dont" .. duh.

3
Knight-errant 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is why you stand your ground and don't comply out of gov't intimidation and fearmongering.

1
AussieSpectator 1 point ago +1 / -0

i have 3 people close to me that have been threatened with losing their job if they don't take the shot, yet none have been fired yet lmao

key word, coercion.

14
magayd45 14 points ago +14 / -0

fuck yes cunt

13
R3VO1utionary 13 points ago +13 / -0

The Ruling Here << Focus on Part II

11
inutterable 11 points ago +11 / -0

Thank you, pede! I used this to obliterate my company's "on the fence" stance about this with my direct WW executive. We're global. We can't blow our Australia business. Decision made. No mandate. Now he and I are preparing to have the fight with the rest of the company to bring them over to full-freedom.

WWG1WGA

2
R3VO1utionary 2 points ago +2 / -0

Fantastic!

10
Christian_Patriots 10 points ago +11 / -1

Praise the Lord!!!!! 🙏

8
Hillary_Clontin 8 points ago +9 / -1

This isn’t what you think it is.

The ruling was against the lady who didn’t want an influenza jab - and was against her appeal - then at the bottom it makes reference to covid mandates potentially not being legal. Doesn’t matter - I’m Still out of a job - so is everyone else who refused. No one is calling us saying “y’all can come back now” No one cares :/ the mandates are still very much in force and enforced.

6
ErOsion9o 6 points ago +6 / -0

Yep... Wife lost her nursing job today. Fucking nightmare this is, WA

1
worldowedexplanation 1 point ago +1 / -0

How long ago did you lose your job? At a certain point when enough people refuse these companies are going to be screwed.

1
Hillary_Clontin 1 point ago +1 / -0

I lost my partner of 3 years on 20th sep (she left me, she’s not dead) and my job on the 30th September. QLD health is a big ass company -

7
LouisBeach 7 points ago +7 / -0

Wohoooo !! Praise God

6
NoNameJames 6 points ago +6 / -0

Where the fuck is our supreme court to rule on this illegal fucking mandate?

8
ProphetOfKek 8 points ago +8 / -0

Eating pizza and worshipping moloch.

2
ItCameOutOfACan 2 points ago +2 / -0

You might not like that decision.

5
swingcat73 5 points ago +5 / -0

Hate to be a doomer, but this was one commissioners dissenting opinion. The appeal was dismissed by a 2 out of 3 majority. It carries not weight at all. The only good thing about it is it that opinion may be able to get an appeal in a federal court.

4
blood-stone 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yup, since that POS company decided to redact an ingredient for the Gene therapy, how can you have informed consent. What if the ingredient is Cyanide? or that black goo from the X-files....You don't know! cause they know if they tell you people will be Wtf!

3
caleb17 3 points ago +3 / -0

baby parts

3
Skyrison 3 points ago +3 / -0

finally! some god damn fucking SENSE

3
ErOsion9o 3 points ago +3 / -0

Trust me that's not the case. My wife lost her job at the hospital today because she refused the jab, and she's pregnant! I've tried to get help but there is none

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Anonymoose 2 points ago +2 / -0

Quick clarification - this is not a court, it's the "Fair Work Commission" - which is the body that controls "Fair Work Australia", the shit-machine that recently released a framework showing how virtually any Australian worker can be the subject of a mandatory vaccination.

So this is the peak employment regulatory body in Australia, making it very clear to the lower-down 'day to day work' body that they're full of crap, and that the pinhead who made the ruling against the lady is indeed a total moron.

They actually refused her appeal - so she's still fired. But the top people in the Fair Work Commission are so angry about all this totalitarian nonsense that right after the section where they effectively said "sorry we can't hear your appeal because you had a crap lawyer who argued on BS details instead of substantive principle", they wrote a section slamming the ruling as total BS, then slamming the state governments for their lockdown BS, then slamming every other compromised body for endless fear mongering.

The ruling ends with a plea to the Australian people not to tolerate any more of this crap - specifically no more hating the purebloods and no more censorship of anyone questioning 'the science'. Clearly they've been waiting for the chance to speak out about this!

This is the most exciting happening I've seen this year :-)

2
Mcmurdo32 2 points ago +2 / -0

If a court can find common sense in that place as much as they've gone full Nazi, then hopefully courts here will come to similar conclusions.

2
Gitmo-or-Bust 2 points ago +2 / -0

RIGhT. So where the fuck is the US Supreme court or someone who can put a halt to EO’s that are CLEARLY unconstitutional..? Since when does everyone just hear a statement on a press briefing and all immediately comply?

Imagine if dickface Xiden said EO starting today all firearms are banned? What is our legal recourse to say, hey wait a fucking minute this needs an immediate challenge before anyone has to comply or worse have their livelihoods threatened if you don’t?

Any lawfags here?

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
VetforTrump 2 points ago +2 / -0

Which court will overturn it.

1
Papa_G 1 point ago +1 / -0

A bit of hopium... But I'm still out of work until I give in and get it ...

It's fucked because Victoria is the only state enforcing if for every single worker in the state

I can drive 4 hours down the road and be fine???

1
Smeg 1 point ago +1 / -0

Amen! It looks like their courts aren't completely corrupt.

1
Matthew2312 1 point ago +1 / -0

Praise Jesus. Please God, keep these wins coming. Amen.

1
mtewamp 1 point ago +1 / -0

Australia deserves what it gets. They gave up their guns, voluntarily. They are the VERY DEFINITION of a cautionary tale for the U.S.

Fucking retards.

1
Hakencruze1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Get to fuck with that bullshit narrative, you can still own a gun in Australia once you have cleared the necessary requirements, the gun amnesty was an amnesty on old guns for cash in effect a buy back, so get your facts right before you go calling people of a whole nation fucking retards on your retarded post.

1
mtewamp 1 point ago +1 / -0

Necessary requirements. Fine. How many handguns are you allowed to own? You, personally, I mean. Without paying money. Are there restrictions on the number and type of handgun you can own? Without being a collector, or some other bullshit?

See, here's the thing... Even 5-10 years ago, everybody in the English-speaking world thought you guys were bad-asses.

Nobody thinks that anymore. Other than the few who are protesting.

1
Crunchy_Bites 1 point ago +1 / -0

Finally a bit sanity in the land down under. They really need a win.

1
Tewdryg 1 point ago +1 / -0

No doubt this is good news for our brothers and sisters down under. Let's see if their Luciferian pedophile run government abides by the ruling.

1
Molog 1 point ago +1 / -0

Saving this, I skimmed over it briefly. Very edifying.

1
Hakencruze1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Don’t stop firing just yet that was an industrial court ruling we are hoping the Supreme Court rules the same , the battle is not over yet but we are make big strides keep fighting!!

1
LightBringerFlex 1 point ago +1 / -0

We already knew. Common sense.

1
MorningLight 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thanks for the good news.

1
HeartofStone 1 point ago +1 / -0

My place of employment in the USA is requiring vaxx prior to employment now. Will be interesting to see how this plays out. I got in before the policy was implemented.

0
magaprincess 0 points ago +1 / -1

THIS IS NOT A WIN. THIS IS BEING MISINTERPRETED. Jesus Christ, stop running with everything you see on bitchute. This is not in relation to Covid.

0
UncleHooly 0 points ago +1 / -1

Watch the name suddenly get changed from vaccine to innoculation or something else.

0
UncleHooly 0 points ago +1 / -1

Bang.

My boss is a criminal.

Just like i told her she was months ago.