"Since you don't agree with me I can only assume that you are a dumb idiot stupid head" This is such a common flat earther remark, they are just trolls.
Easiest way to disprove-long range shooting. You have to take into account both the curvature and the rotation of the earth over a certain distance when aiming. Now explain to me how thats necessary on a flat earth.
Density.
Do engineers need to account for the curvature of the earth when building bridges that are miles long. Or do pilots need to keep adjusting down to account for the curve?
No you don't. You have to take in the velocity and speed of the bullet, the type of bullet itself and the wind. It doesn't have anything to do with curvature. It has to do with the bullet speed and how it will start to lose speed and curve on its own. I teach gun classes and never is it the curvature. Try another argument. This one is lame.
You don't need to account for the curvature or the rotation of the earth while shooting long distance.
This is a lie.
If a bullet in the air for a few seconds needs to account for the earth's rotation, surely anything in the air for a few hours would have an incredible amount of rotation to account for. Each of these objects would be affected by the same force, ultimately. Planes, helicopters, blimps on far greater scale.
Yet, in reality, none of these objects account for Earth's rotation, or it's curvature.
Incorrect. Anything that moves over the surface of any rotating planet is subject to the coriolis effect. Over tiny distances, this is negligible. However, over intercontinental distances, the coriolis effect is very real and needs to be accounted for. ICBMs & aircraft, for example, can correct for this; hurricanes can't, which is one reason why they always turn right (N hemisphere).
Consider 2 observers: one is standing on the equator at sea level, facing east; the other is down a deep, narrow well at a true pole. The former senses only orbital motion; the latter senses only spin. Therefore, as anything moves from the equator towards a pole, the component of orbital motion reduces and the component of spin increases, according to latitude.
Bullets dont have stabilizers or flaps or someone to steer it in the air. You have to go from point A to point B at 500 mph. Mass, speed, elevation, humidity, temperature, wind and surface area all play a factor as well. Its not as simple as "pLaNEs DoNt hAve tO WoRRy aBOut it So its FAkE!" My god at least try to appear intelligent.
"Since you don't agree with me I can only assume that you are a dumb idiot stupid head" This is such a common flat earther remark, they are just trolls.
They band together just like any other shill.
kinda like Q people?
Easiest way to disprove-long range shooting. You have to take into account both the curvature and the rotation of the earth over a certain distance when aiming. Now explain to me how thats necessary on a flat earth.
Density. Do engineers need to account for the curvature of the earth when building bridges that are miles long. Or do pilots need to keep adjusting down to account for the curve?
You didnt answer my question.
Yes to both questions.
To answer your question. Simply no. Engineers use elevation. That is not determined by the rotation of the earth. As for pilots, gravity.
nope because they don't and many question the same but can't say it for fear of losing their jobs.
No you don't. You have to take in the velocity and speed of the bullet, the type of bullet itself and the wind. It doesn't have anything to do with curvature. It has to do with the bullet speed and how it will start to lose speed and curve on its own. I teach gun classes and never is it the curvature. Try another argument. This one is lame.
Ohhhh you teach GUN classes. So that means you know all the guns. OK.
You don't need to account for the curvature or the rotation of the earth while shooting long distance.
This is a lie.
If a bullet in the air for a few seconds needs to account for the earth's rotation, surely anything in the air for a few hours would have an incredible amount of rotation to account for. Each of these objects would be affected by the same force, ultimately. Planes, helicopters, blimps on far greater scale.
Yet, in reality, none of these objects account for Earth's rotation, or it's curvature.
How is that possible?
Incorrect. Anything that moves over the surface of any rotating planet is subject to the coriolis effect. Over tiny distances, this is negligible. However, over intercontinental distances, the coriolis effect is very real and needs to be accounted for. ICBMs & aircraft, for example, can correct for this; hurricanes can't, which is one reason why they always turn right (N hemisphere).
Consider 2 observers: one is standing on the equator at sea level, facing east; the other is down a deep, narrow well at a true pole. The former senses only orbital motion; the latter senses only spin. Therefore, as anything moves from the equator towards a pole, the component of orbital motion reduces and the component of spin increases, according to latitude.
Hope this helps.
Bullets dont have stabilizers or flaps or someone to steer it in the air. You have to go from point A to point B at 500 mph. Mass, speed, elevation, humidity, temperature, wind and surface area all play a factor as well. Its not as simple as "pLaNEs DoNt hAve tO WoRRy aBOut it So its FAkE!" My god at least try to appear intelligent.