363
Comments (44)
sorted by:
13
lsvogel [S] 13 points ago +13 / -0

I signed, no donation required!

9
Icantdothis2 9 points ago +12 / -3

I am sick of signing these!

4
IsThisPlaceAHoneypot 4 points ago +7 / -3

Aaaaand now the CIA knows which voters to poison with lethal fast acting carcinogens.

Petitions achieve nothing at best and there's always a possibility that its a honeypot.

7
BettyLiberty 7 points ago +8 / -1

Pshh. You're here, you're on a list.

4
MNisahellhole 4 points ago +4 / -0

Proudly. I’d rather die standing for what I believe in... 🇺🇸

3
CQVFEFE 3 points ago +3 / -0

Petitions achieve nothing at best

LOL

2
Icantdothis2 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's what I was thinking (not the poisoning part).

2
GulagInmate1776 2 points ago +3 / -1

The paranoid survive.

2
photobuf 2 points ago +2 / -0

I know what you mean but it is not like they are asking you to take your guns and man the wall! A simple signature can mean a lot in a petition!

6
HannahMac84 6 points ago +6 / -0

done and shared to fakebook...let's see if I get fact checked again ...

3
photobuf 3 points ago +3 / -0

Someone STICKY this!!! Everyone needs to sign this!

3
Etinum 3 points ago +3 / -0

signed, and pleasantly surprised they are not asking for donations...

3
DigitSoldier 3 points ago +3 / -0

Done!

3
Censorddit 3 points ago +3 / -0

Mfing signed

2
KurtTingles 2 points ago +2 / -0

When will people realize petitions do fuck all except give the enemy a free watch list of targets? No one in any position of power is obligated under any circumstances to take your petition seriously.

2
Striker1 2 points ago +2 / -0

✔️Done!

2
MotherfuckinMAGA 2 points ago +2 / -0

Signed

2
Thndrous1 2 points ago +2 / -0

Signed

2
FiercePatriot 2 points ago +2 / -0

Signed

2
MAGALogic 2 points ago +2 / -0

Signed.

My small contribution.

2
mundania 2 points ago +5 / -3

They have 41063 signatures as I type this right now…. So that’s at least 41063 people who have no clue about what the Supreme Court does and what its constitutional role is.

2
SFAM1A 2 points ago +5 / -3

You know, I don't wanna be Debbie Downer but we're kiiiinda past the point where petitions are going to do anything.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Dashmoomoo 1 point ago +1 / -0

Signed! I'm on so many lists now.

u/#honkler

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
stormymonday 1 point ago +1 / -0

He better get 40 million, 40 thou won't do it.

0
NeedMoarPillows 0 points ago +2 / -2

Why is there a petition? Lindell said he was taking it directly to be heard and had their ear.

I'm confused.

0
Bedminster 0 points ago +2 / -2

They will not take it up I guarantee it. They will also side with the vax mandate as legal. Get ready for a raft of Shockley unconstitutional rulings from SCOTUS in the coming weeks.

0
deleted 0 points ago +5 / -5
2
DigitSoldier 2 points ago +2 / -0

Actually, Mike is taking this list to the Supreme Court.

3
ProphetOfKek 3 points ago +3 / -0

SCOTUS ignored a coalition of states, you think they will listen to the pillow man with a list of names?

1
DigitSoldier 1 point ago +1 / -0

The state AGs are bringing the case.

We shall see what happens.

1
ProphetOfKek 1 point ago +1 / -0

The State AG of Texas brought the one that was dismissed in December too.

2
DigitSoldier 2 points ago +2 / -0

That was then, this is now.

Then, we didn’t have proof positive of election fraud. Now we do, and in multiple formats.

2
ProphetOfKek 2 points ago +2 / -0

SCOTUS doesn’t typically hear new evidence. They usually look and see if lower courts got their decision making ‘correct’. Hope I’m wrong and this pans out.

2
DigitSoldier 2 points ago +2 / -0

Unless the case is different than before.

I believe the original Texas case was in regards to violation of the constitution. There’s no evidence for that other than an argument made.

What is going this time is completely different.

1
BettyLiberty 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not today, Satan.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
0
deleted 0 points ago +4 / -4
2
irdc 2 points ago +4 / -2

Exactly - this isn't how the legal process works.

I wonder if one state could sue another over certifying a fraudulent election. That might be the fastest way to the SC, but I'm not a legal analyst.

3
erefernow 3 points ago +3 / -0

I thought we tried that already

1
ProphetOfKek 1 point ago +1 / -0

We did.

1
MNisahellhole 1 point ago +1 / -0

Absolutely that can happen. Let’s see if it will.

-1
PatriotFL1978 -1 points ago +1 / -2

That’s what I was thinking. This is like petitioning Taco Bell to bring back the McRib….. I know he is trying to fight the good fight, but this move just makes him look dumb and desperate. I’ll sign it out of principal since I back his cause, but this isn’t going anywhere.