https://news.webindia123.com/news/Articles/World/20211004/3830842.html
Didnt 3 top Australian Leaders resign over last few days..... WWG1WGA
https://news.webindia123.com/news/Articles/World/20211004/3830842.html
Didnt 3 top Australian Leaders resign over last few days..... WWG1WGA
New guy: Commie, or no?
It’s the Japanese Liberal Democratic Party, but their term of liberal Democrat isn’t the same as in the west. Their LDP says they oppose same-sex marriage, promote Japanese independence and opposition to China, focuses on private enterprise instead of government ownership…think this is actually a good thing.
Shinzo Abe is from the LDP, it seems like a based party
This is the PM they were incredibly rude too. I believe President Trump respected him.
https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/stacey-lennox/2021/04/16/joe-biden-a-no-show-to-greet-japanese-prime-minister-and-the-preview-of-a-president-harris-is-awful-n1440618
I'd sit down and have a sake with this folks.
Oh good. I was worried Japan would fall to the commies
That’s exactly what’s happening
A lot of countries use Liberal the opposite of us. The UK does I believe.
A lot of countries use Liberal properly :) I refuse to call the shitlibs in the USA liberals.
JLDP. The utter basta ... No wait.
Bild blidge.
Dammit
Back to Research 101. Wikipedia is not a source. It is crowdsourced. Literally anyone can get on it at any time and write whatever they want on it. Wikipedia has been weaponized by Marxist trolls to attack conservative figures and cover up unflattering history of fellow Marxist politicians and activists. Everything is politicized on that website. Literally everything. Why? Because there is a group of professional academic "fact-checkers" who help resolve issues when contradictory information is posted to articles. Articles that become political battlegrounds get edits turned off until the commissars at Wikipedia can come in and define "Truth" which is inevitably the Leftist narrative.
Wikipedia is NOT a source. In fact, in my experience, even their "sources" are barely recognizable as sources of information half the time. The only use of Wikipedia is to determine the Big Tech party line of what you're supposed to know about a topic from their point of view.
You mean that objective, not-Soros-controlled website?
Thanks
How long has he been in politics?
You better get your definition of "liberal democratic" straightened up real quick, because traditionally it refers to classic liberalism, which is much more in line with free market enterprise, libertarianism, capitalism, individualism, etc. and is very much anti-communist.
In the US you have this weird co-opting of the definitions by the leftist Marxists who want to go all 1984 on us and flip and manufacture definitions.