340
Comments (32)
sorted by:
42
Dkeenan618 42 points ago +42 / -0

Just wrote this on another post. I have 20 different people including myself searching... we can't find it anywhere. I didnt find an excutive order for mandating the medical field either. We're still searching.

21
noidolsleft [S] 21 points ago +21 / -0

That's so messed up that they're able to con so many without this mandate written down anywhere but at OSHA. Supposed to be an order dictating the policy to OSHA.

17
FuckNewsom 17 points ago +17 / -0

They did the same thing with the phony “FDA approval.” People believe the shot is approved, when it isn’t, because of the lie told by gov/media.

3
RedditAsylumSeeker 3 points ago +3 / -0

My last line of defense I've mentally planned on is, so if this is the fda approved one does that mean the EUA no longer provides indemnity to the manufacturers or was the specific batch you intend to give me manufactured under the EUA or post approval.

1
Patriot_Perks 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's very odd how little info about the private sector vax mandate is available.

I found this yahoo news article dealing with the Federal employee mandate, and it has a small blurb discussing the private sector mandate.....

"Meanwhile, private companies with more than 100 employees will be subject to a forthcoming rule from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration requiring all employees to be vaccinated or get tested weekly. Biden announced the regulation weeks ago, but the agency is still drafting the particulars."

https://news.yahoo.com/us-unveils-guidance-federal-vaccine-222402791.html

25
ATLAS_ONE 25 points ago +25 / -0

The whole thing is a smoke and mirrors show. They control the media, so they just throw a bunch of "literally who's" in front of some government logos and normies treat them as an authority. A lot of people and businesses are making decisions based on what they see on TV without any official communication from the government.

14
1Markseeker 14 points ago +14 / -0

I asked my office the other day, "Raise your hand if you think the CDC is a government entity."

Bout HALF (11) of them raised their hands.

I shook my head....

9
muhqtardtho 9 points ago +9 / -0

FedEx is too right?

10
KickingPugilist 10 points ago +10 / -0

Same with Federal Reserve!

3
ATLAS_ONE 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah but their existence and their monopoly on currency creation is written into law by government. A selection of private individuals may take home the profits, but it is a socialist entity.

16
Iknowstuff 16 points ago +16 / -0

Perceived FDA approval via bait & switch tactics, and sloppy at that.

Mandate via Proclamation.

This is not how our government works.

What is it going to take to wake the tards?

11
mitmont123 11 points ago +11 / -0

Here's the pdf for determining yes or no jab in OSHA https://www.osha.gov/sites/default/files/publications/OSHA4125.pdf For Health Care workers ETS Regulatory Text (29 CFR 1910, Subpart U)

But I haven't seen a executive order.

5
noidolsleft [S] 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yeah, that's the rub.

3
anargumentativebox 3 points ago +3 / -0

Based on the flow chart they have, it would not apply to my work place since I don't work for a health care facility and they took all of the necessary precautions. They've been saying they're not going to force vaccination unless things change... So.... Fingers crossed. But we'll cross that bridge if we come to it.

Edit: before I forget, fuck Joe Biden.

1
Trump4NH 1 point ago +2 / -1

Editing your edit: Let's Go Brandon!

2
anargumentativebox 2 points ago +2 / -0

Oh, right. 🤣

9
that_guy_pming_tits 9 points ago +9 / -0

It was a bluff. It requires voluntary participation. If you go get it and there is no law forcing you to, you volunteered. Doesn’t matter what they say.

6
aquasmurf 6 points ago +6 / -0

color of law BS

I wish you didn't put it like that. It kind of minimizes the actual enormity of it.

e - https://www.justice.gov/crt/deprivation-rights-under-color-law

6
noidolsleft [S] 6 points ago +6 / -0

Color of law is a thing, but we rarely see it prosecuted. I like how they include care providers in the statute.

Persons acting under color of law within the meaning of this statute include police officers, prisons guards and other law enforcement officials, as well as judges, care providers in public health facilities, and others who are acting as public officials. It is not necessary that the crime be motivated by animus toward the race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin of the victim.

Lots of injuries and death from this bunch of no laws. Hoping for some justice as described:

The offense is punishable by a range of imprisonment up to a life term, or the death penalty, depending upon the circumstances of the crime, and the resulting injury, if any.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
6
harkk 6 points ago +6 / -0

Maybe Jill forgot and signed her own name instead of Joe's.

4
Huckleberry1776 4 points ago +4 / -0

https://www.federalregister.gov/presidential-documents/executive-orders/joe-biden/2021

EO 14043and 14042. I’m about to lose my job over this shit. It’s right there guys and it pisses me off.

3
noidolsleft [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yes. I saw that. It's for federal workers only. That's a lot of people and is just as wrong.

14043

I have determined that to promote the health and safety of the Federal workforce and the efficiency of the civil service, it is necessary to require COVID-19 vaccination for all Federal employees, subject to such exceptions as required by law.

14044 is about a science council.

It's all designed to piss us off. Stay strong fren!

2
Huckleberry1776 2 points ago +2 / -0

My bad. 14042 was the one for contractors of federal contracts.

2
noidolsleft [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Still a lot of people and not right.

1
Huckleberry1776 1 point ago +1 / -0

The way they’re doing it is that they’re rewriting the contracts to require it of federal contractors and employees. The loophole I see is that they have a a clause “in accordance with existing laws” or something like that. If the existing available vaccines are Emergency Use Approval only and the only approved vaccine - Confirmaty, I think - is not available, then they can’t do this. But I can’t find where the FDA approval for vaccines is. I don’t think they care because my manager is all on board with this BS. I told her EO’s are Laws passed by Congress. They can’t make undergo medical procedures that we don’t want. No company is going to risk very lucrative contracts. They’d rather lose 20% than 100%. I’ll let them fire me and then sue. It’s horrible but I think its the beginning. By midterms or just after, they want to make us Australia. I’m hoping that patriots launch and Trump is president by Christmas. I still remember the Clement prophecy “they will fall in the Fall. There will be rejoicing by Christmas”.

1
Huckleberry1776 1 point ago +1 / -0

One more point about this BS. The government cannot rewrite federal contracts unilaterally. And many contracts are funded over a period of years so they shouldn’t be able to do this all at once. My Prime is a university though, so my guess is they’ll roll over. Hopefully that will be the failure point of this and give a ton of contractors the chink in their armor to win lawsuits along with the fact that there is not FDA approved vaccine.

1
MommaChz1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yep me too Fren! Im an unhappy girl about all this garbage!

3
45-4KAG 3 points ago +3 / -0

cries in federal contractor

2
VetforTrump 2 points ago +2 / -0

People don't pay attention

1
noidolsleft [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Demoralized people can't. They've been brainwashed.

1
Suicidal-cali-ped 1 point ago +1 / -0

In California they're making the mandate for him starting november. No place here wants business anymore they'll allow Garcetti to make it with no push back.