Why would you think that? How can you be smart enough to realize this is valuable testimony, but stupid enough to not know what a fucking jury is. Cray cray.
Not actually aware of how this kind of stuff goes on another continent. Jury is a 4 letter word which kinda got close to a bunch of decision makers listening to a testimony.
Perfect redpill material. Also saving for when my work tries to force me to be vaxxed… That day is coming in less than 2 months. (I will never be vaxxed)
Which he may or may not have done; you can usually submit documents into public record.
Weird I got downvoted on a Q research board for mentioning that providing proof makes your case more sound.
I’m giving the benefit of the doubt in that off camera, he may have submitted studies into the public record. But without any evidence that he did that, it’d be pretty easy for some normie watching this as “but muh peer reviewed evidence”.
You and I don’t need the sources because we already know. But normies will definitely parrot the “debooonked” shit.
Because as a scientist---(some use this dishonestly, but NOT here)---its common knowledge that there's peer reviewed studies proving that (1) masks don't stop a virus and that (2) they do limit oxygen to the wearer. Common knowledge doesn't need citations.
[The 3rd mentioned was how bacterial infections caused by masks made the Spanish flu much worse...offered originally over 20 years ago by Dr. Fauci, before he became a population-busting cabal politician.]
Citing know facts and adding "peer reviewed" for emphasis doesn't require a presentation of documents and citations. Much as.... if you referred to gravity, it wouldn't be necessary to offer a treatise on Isaac Newton.
A demand for proofs on the 3 "peer reviewed" references he made would be pedantic obstructionism and a waste of everyone's time, both in that meeting and on this thread.
No ones demanding anything for the sake of this thread, dude. If he was on video offering to provide documents or references to the research, it would have been way more eye opening for normies. That’s literally my only suggestion here.
What an absolute champion...
That was one of the most concise COVID Hoax dismantling efforts I've ever seen on this topic.
...and he finishes his statements with time to spare. Much respect.
I was hoping he would have used that time to include the statement “This is a pandemic of the VACCINATED.”
Agreed
This is what a real doctor looks like. He wants to cure people.
HECK YES.. and that ending. I cheered! "YOU WILL BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE"
Wow this is the best I have heard.
I saved it. First video I saved here
What a man! That's how you tell these cucks right from wrong! Make em think what they have done to themselves, even just for a few seconds!
Tells a jury? This was just some guy speaking up at a county commisioner meeting. Happens everyday…..
Got more videos like this?
Okidoki, thought it was some jury…
Why would the mayor be in court
he did commit crimes...
Why would you think that? How can you be smart enough to realize this is valuable testimony, but stupid enough to not know what a fucking jury is. Cray cray.
Not actually aware of how this kind of stuff goes on another continent. Jury is a 4 letter word which kinda got close to a bunch of decision makers listening to a testimony.
Mods Sticky this one!
This guy may need our support after he gave his address.
Why does one get the feeling those who he is addressing know every word he is stated but just don't care?
God bless him
I believe it would be beneficial if op's of such meaty videos also served up some saucy documentation to compliment the meal.
Thank you
A link I can copy and paste please
https://files.catbox.moe/thx9aj.MP4
This kind of video can be saved easily. Press or right click on it, "save video" pops up, save it and it downloads.
Thx
Perfect redpill material. Also saving for when my work tries to force me to be vaxxed… That day is coming in less than 2 months. (I will never be vaxxed)
Hell Yea!
Thank you such a brave soul!! God bless you… all of the other doctors staying silent should be ashamed of themselves… they will be held accountable.
Brilliant, with 13 seconds to spare. This doc need a medal and a constant platform from which to speak this truth!
Brass pair on this dude! Kek
As awesome as this was, there was no “proof”, just a bunch of claims of “peer reviewed research”. He never once cited anyone’s work.
Which he may or may not have done; you can usually submit documents into public record. Weird I got downvoted on a Q research board for mentioning that providing proof makes your case more sound.
First you claim there "was no proof" and then you say "may or may not have done."
FYI, I did not downvote either.
... is this all you had to contribute to this thread? Needless antagonizing?
I’m giving the benefit of the doubt in that off camera, he may have submitted studies into the public record. But without any evidence that he did that, it’d be pretty easy for some normie watching this as “but muh peer reviewed evidence”.
You and I don’t need the sources because we already know. But normies will definitely parrot the “debooonked” shit.
Because as a scientist---(some use this dishonestly, but NOT here)---its common knowledge that there's peer reviewed studies proving that (1) masks don't stop a virus and that (2) they do limit oxygen to the wearer. Common knowledge doesn't need citations. [The 3rd mentioned was how bacterial infections caused by masks made the Spanish flu much worse...offered originally over 20 years ago by Dr. Fauci, before he became a population-busting cabal politician.]
Citing know facts and adding "peer reviewed" for emphasis doesn't require a presentation of documents and citations. Much as.... if you referred to gravity, it wouldn't be necessary to offer a treatise on Isaac Newton.
A demand for proofs on the 3 "peer reviewed" references he made would be pedantic obstructionism and a waste of everyone's time, both in that meeting and on this thread.
No ones demanding anything for the sake of this thread, dude. If he was on video offering to provide documents or references to the research, it would have been way more eye opening for normies. That’s literally my only suggestion here.