It's like a little mental game they're playing, getting us used to using a word that doesn't really apply yet, but will. At least I believe they want it to. Words have meanings, right? Especially when speaking in legal or medical terms. So, I'm not vaccinated, because I haven't got the shot, if I were UNvaccinated, wouldn't that imply that I was at one point vaccinated? Can someone who's vaccinated become unvaccinated? Is that what they will consider people who don't keep up with their boosters? Like, the vax wears off if you don't get them and now you have become unvaccinated and your passport thing doesn't work anymore?
When have we ever used that term "unvaccinated" before? When did we ever really say vaccinated? Immunized is the word that rings in my head when I think about it. Schools needed proof of immunizations not proof of vaccination. Is it because this "Jab" doesn't immunize you, maybe? That's why they're changing definitions on us, a vaccine doesn't give you immunity it lessens symptoms or some shit now. And it seems like "immunized" is taking a back seat to "vaccinated" now and proof of immunity isn't good enough anymore, you still have to be vaccinated even if you're already immune. And the vaccine actually weakens your immune system and makes it stop fighting otherwise it would reject the vaccine. It's like this vaccine gives you aids (didn't Fauci have something to do with that, too?) so it can work.
So it's pretty clear they don't give a fuck if you're immune to illness. They just want you to keep getting shot up and they changed the vernacular so we forget that being immune > being vaccinated. It's some weird ass mind control spell.
Good point! I remember when I was going to school and when my kids were in school, you needed “proof of immunization” not “proof of vaccination”!
Yes, they will designate ppl as unvaxd if they don't take the boosters . . .
This explanation could be an excellent red pill if it could be captured in a meme.
That distinction makes the terminology important, if not critical. Especially since we are even now starting to see the lie put forwards that people who have had the vax are now claimed to be unvaxxed by governments... when they have no right to such a claim.
Yeah and we need to hammer the immunity of those who had the thing!!
I had a hard time condensing that thought into coherent words. How to express it with a picture is going to drive me crazy all day now.
You did very well explaining it in words.
Maybe picture 2 people on a time line. Not vaxed, months go by, still not vaxd. Vaccinated, months go by w/o booster => unvaxccinated
That's a good start. It's still going to drive me crazy since I made the first meme I've made in a long while yesterday that I was pretty happy with and I'm going to feel pressure to top that one.
**IDENTITY POLITICS - BLACK OR WHITE THINKING - NARCISSISM **
The prefix Un- simply means “not”. There is no inferred implication that the opposite state occurred previously.
“Undressed” means NOT dressed, it does not mean that you were dressed previously.
Consider “unloved” - doesn’t mean someone was loved previously.
“Untrusted” doesn’t mean used to be trusted.
“Unintelligent” doesn’t mean used to be intelligent.
And “unvaxxed” does not mean “used to be vaxxed”
You can become every one of those words except unvaccinated
Ok, and? That changes the meaning of the prefix?
Because we don't have the technology to extract a vaccine once it's been administered, that means that Un- no longer means what it means?
How about the word unaged? My aged wine can never become unaged once it's been aged, does that mean that "unaged" no longer means "not aged"? 🙄
So, you don't think they'll start calling people who've had the shot unvaccinated ever?
Yes but that misses the bigger point IMO. These are not a vaccines. Messenger RNA gene therapy is not a vaccine.
that's why they had to change the definition