161
So what was spygate? (threadreaderapp.com)
posted ago by BQnita ago by BQnita +161 / -0
Comments (70)
sorted by:
16
sword 16 points ago +16 / -0

I forget the details but DawsonSField put out disinfo several years ago and this thread smells bad too.

"It was intended to give Hillary an excuse to fire Comey, Baker & any other honest people at FBI. Fire them for investigating both candidates, to hide it was firing them to end Clinton investigations."

Comey honest?????

7
bubble_bursts 7 points ago +8 / -1

Not honest, but rather not crooked enough for Hillary's liking. He hid her 330k emails and letonly 60k in the official story, but that wasn't enough for her.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
3
NOTWOKE 3 points ago +3 / -0

Hmmm. Never considered

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
3
Shanjaq 3 points ago +3 / -0

lots of "according to people familiar with the matter" in those snippets provided, it's an interesting read but something does seem a bit off-the-mark about how it portrays the agencies and some actors do appear subtly out-of-character with what we've learned over the years. if there's a war between the agencies, and there's an airtight investigation ongoing, I could see some benefit in seeding the press influencers and research communities with bits of narrative to alter their perception prior to anything breaking..

2
BQnita [S] 2 points ago +3 / -1

Biblical.

0
Hortance 0 points ago +1 / -1

Dawson's Field---Google it? Celebrates some 1970s group of pro-"Palestinian" hijackers.

9
Hortance 9 points ago +10 / -1

It looks like something from James Comey's PR firm....

The ONE Durham conviction so far is wrong, the one current indictment is wrong....

RussiaGate wasn't about getting Trump, it was REALLY about Hillary, trying to "get" Comey for "investigating" her. No, really!!! LOL!!

Blame the dead girl!

Oh, and the FISA Courts abuses, etc.....Well, we just have to remember that there were some problems there, but that the FISA was set up to fix the TERRIBLE abuses of the Bush Administration and international intel-abuse mastermind and Bush AG Alberto Gonzalez.

This is a wet-dream fantasy of .....it HAS to be originating from Comey or the Democraps in general.

5
bubble_bursts 5 points ago +7 / -2

I want Anons to show their critical thinking skills on this one. Lots to dig here. The big plot twist here is that this analysis says Comey and Baker were the good guys. It tries to minimise the spying of Trump, but if you read the whole article it becomes clear that spying of Trump followed the same modus operandi as all the previous NSA+FISA abuses, and hence definitely happened but the big deal is that there was so much more than just that.

So if we can suspend our distaste at imagining Comey as anything but a weasel, this story makes a lot of sense. One important connection was the fact that Obama handed over all the email/phone data from NSA to Nustar (The same company thats part of the Sussman indictment). To imagine every email and phone stored on a private company server, which was then used without qualms to try and frame Trump shows how deadly serious this was.

The way this analysis reads, its almost like Trump forced them to violate the FISA laws in his case, exactly how they violated all the times in the past 10-12 years. This is similar to forcing Dems to commit election fraud just like they did all the years prior while being monitored, and also getting FBI to commit Jan 6 false flag just like all the times in the past, but this time being while monitored.

I am open to analysis that digs into his sources (and to his credit he has given a lot of sources from the past) and proves him factually wrong. My guess is, he might still be wrong about Comey & Baker, but his analysis that this ties in with decades long abuses and brings the whole house of cards down from the days of Bush might actually be the real take away.

3
BQnita [S] 3 points ago +4 / -1

Cognitive dissonance at play.

1
bubble_bursts 1 point ago +1 / -0

My analysis? How so?

3
BQnita [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

Not. Not yours. How many find it hard to even consider Comey being a white hat.

2
Mountaing8 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well, I recall that he re-opened the Hillary email investigation right smack before the election. It made me wonder why. Hillary can't have liked that.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
LongTimeListener 1 point ago +2 / -1

Whats your fucking game here bubble? This is a load of shit. Ive been researching this since it began. Comey is 100% part of a plot against Trump along with the Obama admin, the DNC and the Hillary campaign.

Comey a good guy? Hes a fucking traitor and you are eating their shit for dinner.

2
BQnita [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Easy now. It's my post. And I tend to agree w/ bb. we can discuss this here, the right way. None of us know the plan even if you have researched for forever But it does make sense. To quote Shooter - "the moment you think you got it figured, you're wrong."

3
LongTimeListener 3 points ago +3 / -0

There is a serious lack of knowledge on the intricacies of FISAgate here at GA. You guys talk about the IG report like it was just released. This shit is old, old news. It is why I have begged people to go research the archives at TheConservativeTreehouse.com. I have read these reports. I have read the reports by FISA judges Collyer and Boasberg.

Anything that tries to refute foreknowledge by the FBI and Comey is utter crap. They were all complicit. This isnt a battle between Hillarys campaign and Comeys FBI, it is a plot to destroy President Trump and enslave humanity.

Sundance called out these attempts to distract and misinform to protect the institutions within hours of the Sussman indictment. Letting these traitors inside the governement off the hook is unconscionable.

2
BQnita [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

They aren't the be all end all for info. And a little humility goes a long way. There are literally millions of us digging and for you to crucify those who present info that upsets your read out of a subject is just wrong. Open your mind a bit to the possibility that nothing is what it seems.

1
bubble_bursts 1 point ago +1 / -0

Did u even read the full comment?

1
LongTimeListener 1 point ago +1 / -0

I respect you BB but you are eating a turd sandwich here.

1
BQnita [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

He didn't even read it. Your analysis rocked. Dont sweat longtimelistener.

2
bubble_bursts 2 points ago +2 / -0

Its not really about what people think of me. I want everyone here to learn to analyse things critically without getting emotional, and I am happy to keep driving that point home no matter how much they hate me for it. If we don't do this, we are no different than the reddit cult.

0
LongTimeListener 0 points ago +1 / -1

No need your starting point is flawed. Anything pointing to absolving the FBI, CIA, DNC, Obama admin of guilt is utter bullshit. I have been reading Sundances impeccable research through this entire travesty. The stuff you guys have been posting here I have delved deep into 5 years ago. That entire thread is misdirection and lies.

2
BQnita [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

You didn't even read it?? Then why say anything? If you can't take new info and compare it with what you think you know then you are in for some major upset. This just keeps going deeper and deeper. I encourage you to read it.

2
bubble_bursts 2 points ago +2 / -0

I was hoping that someone more well versed in this stuff would give a logical counter-analysis against this research, rather than get upset. I gave the TL;DR of the article to it could be the starting point for a debate rather. This is the place we should be not afraid to hold a thought in our head without thinking we are agreeing with it, or without getting angry at that thought itself.

Nothing in that article absolves FBI, CIA, DNC or Obama Admin. Infact, this thread could be extended to show how Obama admin was as implicated as the Bush/Clinton Admin, and perhaps even find clues that this indictment might be aiming at them as well.

Infact, its possible to take this thread and fix it with more clues and perhaps it may turn out that Comey was as much an asshole as we all thought, and he also pulled a lot more people with him that we originally thought. The possibilities are endless.

If this indictment points to the fact that its net is much wider than what we originally though, why would it be a bad thing?

1
HOSEQ 1 point ago +1 / -0

Future Proves Past....

1
nothingberg 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'll remind you that in jun or july 2016, comey exonerated Hillary with this weaksauce 'no mens rea' argument as to why his FBI would not be pursuing 'thousands of felonies' she committed by having her own private email server

1
bubble_bursts 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fair enough, now do Baker (I havent really paid attention to this guy until now)

4
bubble_bursts 4 points ago +6 / -2

Wow good stuff, lots to unpack

1
Hortance 1 point ago +4 / -3

its garbage

1
bubble_bursts 1 point ago +3 / -2

How about some analysis?

4
Hortance 4 points ago +5 / -1

its elsewhere on this thread

2
bubble_bursts 2 points ago +2 / -0

Love for you to take a look at my take on this: https://greatawakening.win/p/13zgEHK7E3/x/c/4JFpBx5Ykp2

4
LongTimeListener 4 points ago +5 / -1

This is all crap. They are trying to absolve Brennan, Comey, McCabe, Obama, Rice, Lynch, Jarrett, the FISA court et. al. of crimes they were 100% involved in and propagated and place it squarely on Hillarys underlings as the scapegoats. Pure bullshit.

If this is the direction Durham is going he is a fucking traitor.

2
chicagotrauma 2 points ago +4 / -2

Comey is a "good guy " at FBI that Hillary wanted to fire? Lots of info that may be real, but that premise pretty much makes this worthless in terms of analysis

0
bubble_bursts 0 points ago +3 / -3

You have to read the entire thread. Yes, he says that Comey and Baker were the good guys that were trying to stop the NSA+FISA abuse, but it doesnt mean that Trump was not spied upon, nor does it mean Hillary did not start the Trump spying.

It also implicates all the bad actors from Bush admin and it is pretty huge. We have to at least be open minded that Comey was playing a bigger role in bringing down a bigger conspiracy and just like Trump and Sessions animosity fooled everyone, its conceivable that Trump and Comey animosity threw everyone off as to what they were really going to do.

BTW, this is not the first time I am hearing that when Trump fired Comey, Comey was already out the door.

1
Hortance 1 point ago +1 / -0

Remember when Comey met with Trump, then started saying he had NOTES!!! from the meeting--insinuating he was going to lie about Trump making illegal offers/requests.

The media was full of shitheads attesting to the Dreaded Comey Notes.

Why, everyone knew that Comey took lots of notes, basically transcribing every comment in every meeting!
This would be very bad for Trump!
What were the notes going to be?

Then Trump said "yeah, lets have those notes. I may have actually recorded that meeting" as well.

And then all the bitches laid down. Like bitches. Remember?

Comey was NEVER a white hat.

1
bubble_bursts 1 point ago +1 / -0

All valid points. Now please do Baker.

3
SuckaFree 3 points ago +3 / -0

This guy's assessment flies in the face of all the other assessments that say otherwise. Comey, Baker, etc are all dirty. We know this. We've seen it. This guy has been placed to muddy up waters. Distract and divide.

0
LongTimeListener 0 points ago +1 / -1

And bubble_bursts fell for the ruse hook, line and sinker.

2
bubble_bursts 2 points ago +2 / -0

I am a bit disappointed that people here confuse a discussion about an idea with agreeing with that idea. I thought Q had taught us better than that.

3
gobby 3 points ago +3 / -0

Thank you!

3
koalakingdom 3 points ago +4 / -1

Thanks for the share anon :)

2
Hortance 2 points ago +3 / -1

its crap

2
Plantmedicine 2 points ago +2 / -0

Its been so long....

2
conspiracynomore 2 points ago +2 / -0

Is it true that the metadata of these photos shared by Comey show that they were all taken on July 7, 2017? If so, I wonder what he might be trying to signal and to whom...

https://twitter.com/Comey/status/921536987072483328 https://twitter.com/Comey/status/922486295611371526 https://twitter.com/Comey/status/1008040710283628544 https://twitter.com/Comey/status/1109930531389472768

2
conspiracynomore 2 points ago +2 / -0

Also, the timestamp embedded within the metadata of Comey's photos linked above seems to be 13:22.

When Q shared one of Comey's photo in drop #3525, the image was cropped to a height of 1322px. I get the feeling there's a clue hidden there but I'm having difficulty figuring it out.

https://qagg.news/?read=3525

1
bubble_bursts 1 point ago +1 / -0

The picture in the corn field was taken a week before first Q drop. Corn can also be interpreted as a farm-product - as in CIA assets. Interesting tweets.

2
conspiracynomore 2 points ago +2 / -0

Comey shared it a week prior, but check the metadata to see when it was actually taken.

The idea of the CIA wanting to "Harvest" James Corney kinda makes what Q has hinted at fit with Dawson's theory...

1
BQnita [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Comey gave them what they needed, then was freed, which could explain why he's been off the radar for a good while. And I have always believed Mueller to be a white hat. Just me talking...

1
Hortance 1 point ago +1 / -0

There's NO connection.

COMEY posted the pics. HE was messaging.

NOT the CIA and NOT Q.

You are working very hard at this lie, while still being bad at it.

You are saying....Comey was messaging that the CIA wanted to "Harvest" him? Why would COMEY message that?

1
conspiracynomore 1 point ago +1 / -0

CIA = the farm; Manafort = plant; FISA warrant = 'ear' of corn; Horowitz report OCR error = James Corney (see Q3708); Corn Harvest = [James Corney];

The initial plan, as Dawson's thread does a good job at outlining, was to set up Comey to allow President HRC (God forbid) to fire him and replace with a FBI Director she could control (and who wasn't privy to her previous scandals). Only latterly did the FISA also become the "insurance policy".

The Q team likely informed Comey of HRC's plot to throw him under the combine in late October 2016 and this helped motivate him to re-open the Clinton email investigation. Comey has been dropping hints ever since that he is working with the Q team, but still uses a great deal of kayfabe to prevent both anons and the deep state from discovering role in the plan ("What makes a movie good?")

The Twitter photos linked above are all "future proves past" clues that will reveal which side Comey has been playing for.

Durham will indict Comey on a perjury charge for signing the first CP FISA, but he'll probably then do what caged birds do... and since he's trusted by the libs they will probably listen to him rat out Brennan/Ohr etc.

Also see the time/date stamp here and compare with the watches shared by Q on 3.27.19. What's the connection? "[Watch] what happens next":

https://twitter.com/Comey/status/1155271446207389696

2
deleted 2 points ago +4 / -2
1
bubble_bursts 1 point ago +1 / -0

Then dig deeper into it, and definitively dismantle the analysis - or build on top of it into something better (oh Gawd that sounds like bbb). Take it as a challenge. Dont let emotion guide your opinions. Think of this as a finals assignment in critical thinking 101 :)

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
BQnita [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

If you like facts then read it. It's full of links backing up his thread. You said yourself, unless you're missing pieces to the puzzle. That's possible for all of us. It's not an opinion piece. It's a thorough layout/analysis of how deeply embedded this corruption is.

1
BurtMcGirt 1 point ago +1 / -0

Part of the communists' "insurance policy".

1
chicagotrauma 1 point ago +3 / -2

Comey is a "good guy".... Hahahahahah

1
deleted 1 point ago +4 / -3
1
Hortance 1 point ago +1 / -0

BIG PICTURE HERE ON THIS THREAD:

What has happened over the last couple of weeks:

  1. We've turned the corner. No reputable source can accuse Trump of Russia collusion. NYTimes being mocked about "give back your awards," etc

  2. Indictments are being secured UP the chain to the DNC and folks like Comey, McCabe, Shrillary Clintoon, etc....

  3. Russia Collusion is now 100% about punishing criminals that abuse secure intel, abuse FISA, skirt election law, etc....100% Democrat ass at risk now. Including Dem operatives outside the Party and members of "power" Dem law firms.

Thats a BIG CHANGE

Those POS's are now floating alternate theories about the facts that are known. No more "blame Trump", now its just balls-out "blame anybody else"

What OP has posted here is a few facts that are known, then TONS of supposition, alt theories, etc about the targets, laughable attempts to change motives and ultimately, to insinuate that THE ABUSES OF NSA and other surveillance programs can be BLAMED on the BUSH Administration.

GOT it? The Dems in legal jeapardy want to BLAME THE BUSH Administration for DEM EFFORTS TO SEND DONALD TRUMP TO PRISON for a BOGUS, NEVER-HAPPENED "crime" of "collusion".

OP is not doing these boards any favors by offering and defending the Left's emerging Russia Collusion Scam defense.

2
BQnita [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

You can say whatever you want about me. I'm pretty thick skinned. I come here to post memes, news articles and information that encourages critical thinking. This thread, for example. It definitely flips the script. If you don't agree with it- good. Let's discuss. But don't try and discredit me to other anons. Nobody knows how this ends. Instead, try bringing something more than strife to this platform?

1
Hortance 1 point ago +1 / -0

OK thats fair. I don't pay close atten to who posts what, but note that you are certainly in the mainstream here., from a scan of your posts.....So, sorry about the insult.

Since I see the scenario as a lie from the folks who are now in trouble and self-serving lies from the enemy make me mad, I shot the messenger. Didn't really need to do that...Lets leave it at disagree; I take back the criticism and the attitude :)

2
BQnita [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Deal.👍

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
ImGumbyDammit 1 point ago +1 / -0

Spygate? That’s where Obama and Biden use that double sided dildo on each other that the lessbeeyans and trannys use to screw each other cause they have no penises and will always be females and will never, EVER be males.