I want Anons to show their critical thinking skills on this one. Lots to dig here. The big plot twist here is that this analysis says Comey and Baker were the good guys. It tries to minimise the spying of Trump, but if you read the whole article it becomes clear that spying of Trump followed the same modus operandi as all the previous NSA+FISA abuses, and hence definitely happened but the big deal is that there was so much more than just that.
So if we can suspend our distaste at imagining Comey as anything but a weasel, this story makes a lot of sense. One important connection was the fact that Obama handed over all the email/phone data from NSA to Nustar (The same company thats part of the Sussman indictment). To imagine every email and phone stored on a private company server, which was then used without qualms to try and frame Trump shows how deadly serious this was.
The way this analysis reads, its almost like Trump forced them to violate the FISA laws in his case, exactly how they violated all the times in the past 10-12 years. This is similar to forcing Dems to commit election fraud just like they did all the years prior while being monitored, and also getting FBI to commit Jan 6 false flag just like all the times in the past, but this time being while monitored.
I am open to analysis that digs into his sources (and to his credit he has given a lot of sources from the past) and proves him factually wrong. My guess is, he might still be wrong about Comey & Baker, but his analysis that this ties in with decades long abuses and brings the whole house of cards down from the days of Bush might actually be the real take away.
Well, I recall that he re-opened the Hillary email investigation right smack before the election. It made me wonder why. Hillary can't have liked that.
I want Anons to show their critical thinking skills on this one. Lots to dig here. The big plot twist here is that this analysis says Comey and Baker were the good guys. It tries to minimise the spying of Trump, but if you read the whole article it becomes clear that spying of Trump followed the same modus operandi as all the previous NSA+FISA abuses, and hence definitely happened but the big deal is that there was so much more than just that.
So if we can suspend our distaste at imagining Comey as anything but a weasel, this story makes a lot of sense. One important connection was the fact that Obama handed over all the email/phone data from NSA to Nustar (The same company thats part of the Sussman indictment). To imagine every email and phone stored on a private company server, which was then used without qualms to try and frame Trump shows how deadly serious this was.
The way this analysis reads, its almost like Trump forced them to violate the FISA laws in his case, exactly how they violated all the times in the past 10-12 years. This is similar to forcing Dems to commit election fraud just like they did all the years prior while being monitored, and also getting FBI to commit Jan 6 false flag just like all the times in the past, but this time being while monitored.
I am open to analysis that digs into his sources (and to his credit he has given a lot of sources from the past) and proves him factually wrong. My guess is, he might still be wrong about Comey & Baker, but his analysis that this ties in with decades long abuses and brings the whole house of cards down from the days of Bush might actually be the real take away.
My analysis? How so?
Well, I recall that he re-opened the Hillary email investigation right smack before the election. It made me wonder why. Hillary can't have liked that.