Can you explain the positive side to optics like this? I can't see it, but open to being wrong. Because MTG called out Lin's faith, she kind of hit a nerve with me, and I don't see how these undercurrents of division are beneficial unless MTG is really trying to get people to not trust Lin.
I remember not too many weeks ago, some here were expressing doubts about Lin Wood. The moral here is that nobody's perfect, and both Lin Wood and MTG have done more work to advance the cuase of freedom than any two of most of us or our leaders. It is good to call out what we feel are mistakes and shortcomings, but let's not tear down our own. Suggest that each statement of criticism be accompanied by two complimentary statements.
She doesn't do anything legislative and she doesn't say anything original and most telling, she's doing zip, nada about the steal in her own state. She's giving me strong vibes of a Rubio clone.
She overplayed her hand when she went against Lin Wood. Now she's exposed.
I Personally think its optics...
Can you explain the positive side to optics like this? I can't see it, but open to being wrong. Because MTG called out Lin's faith, she kind of hit a nerve with me, and I don't see how these undercurrents of division are beneficial unless MTG is really trying to get people to not trust Lin.
I remember not too many weeks ago, some here were expressing doubts about Lin Wood. The moral here is that nobody's perfect, and both Lin Wood and MTG have done more work to advance the cuase of freedom than any two of most of us or our leaders. It is good to call out what we feel are mistakes and shortcomings, but let's not tear down our own. Suggest that each statement of criticism be accompanied by two complimentary statements.
She doesn't do anything legislative and she doesn't say anything original and most telling, she's doing zip, nada about the steal in her own state. She's giving me strong vibes of a Rubio clone.