It just seems like the kinda thing a loser leftist academic would say with a sneer, like "hehe he called us marxists; there are no Marxists anymore only neomarxian intersectional postmodernist."
What if you're a conservative normy intrigued when you learn of it. That level of obscure esoterica shouldn't be expected to be readily known in regular society.
What has happened here is the fake news MSM needed to label Q and Q followers with something that can be easily searched so they can dish out propaganda hit pieces to anyone interested because searching for the single letter “Q” would not be unique enough to dish out propaganda on the topic.
If Q had started out saying we are all known as QAnon, and then changed his mind later saying there is no Qanon, then I would agree with you. But that didn’t happen.
But the word anon is already in more common use and doesn't mean one is necessarily into Q. What you're saying is true from one angle but to someone who isn't in that circle it's untrue. That's how they legitimately cognitively distinguish between the two
Even languages have grammatical rules and words have definitions. Sometimes words have multiple definitions which require context to determine what a word means in a sentence, but the context is derived from using the grammatical rules which are not subjective.
So here we have a case where the media created a new term for a group of people and created a definition for the word which isn’t true about that group of people. The group of people have every right to say that word and definition does not apply to them and reject it as false because it is false and is not true.
Like i said it's true for your side but outside what im saying is true. It's offputting to outsiders wanting in and reminds me of 90s hardcore scene faggots.
Re: Language i think you're bordering on idolatry there bc there's no "it" to it, it's not a 3 dimensional element of creation. You can say "language" as a thing for brevity but it's shorthand for a constantly renegotiated game with sounds and symbols. It's not like gravity or biology or beings or anything real in that sense.
I don't think you can say in good faith that there's not orders of magnitude difference between experimental genetic therapy and an insider term of a specific internet nerd niche
In that other thread you say anyone who follows MSM should die. Then in this one you say we should accept what MSM states about us (calling us QAnon) because its stupid to even try and correct it.
Apparently, no harder than it is to convince people that the jabs don't work and are harmful. :-(
u/#q4881
The only people who use the label QAnon is the MSM.
Just about everything the MSM writes about QAnon is bullshit and usually has nothing to do with Q.
So there is a QAnon, but it has nothing to do with Q or any anons.
It just seems like the kinda thing a loser leftist academic would say with a sneer, like "hehe he called us marxists; there are no Marxists anymore only neomarxian intersectional postmodernist."
What if you're a conservative normy intrigued when you learn of it. That level of obscure esoterica shouldn't be expected to be readily known in regular society.
I don’t see the parallel.
What has happened here is the fake news MSM needed to label Q and Q followers with something that can be easily searched so they can dish out propaganda hit pieces to anyone interested because searching for the single letter “Q” would not be unique enough to dish out propaganda on the topic.
If Q had started out saying we are all known as QAnon, and then changed his mind later saying there is no Qanon, then I would agree with you. But that didn’t happen.
But the word anon is already in more common use and doesn't mean one is necessarily into Q. What you're saying is true from one angle but to someone who isn't in that circle it's untrue. That's how they legitimately cognitively distinguish between the two
Truth is truth no matter what angle you look at it from.
Just because someone believes a falsehood about something doesn’t change the truth of that thing.
That's true for like science and facts but language is symbolic and necessarily subjective and fluid. It's collective not objective
I would argue against that stance.
Even languages have grammatical rules and words have definitions. Sometimes words have multiple definitions which require context to determine what a word means in a sentence, but the context is derived from using the grammatical rules which are not subjective.
So here we have a case where the media created a new term for a group of people and created a definition for the word which isn’t true about that group of people. The group of people have every right to say that word and definition does not apply to them and reject it as false because it is false and is not true.
Like i said it's true for your side but outside what im saying is true. It's offputting to outsiders wanting in and reminds me of 90s hardcore scene faggots.
Re: Language i think you're bordering on idolatry there bc there's no "it" to it, it's not a 3 dimensional element of creation. You can say "language" as a thing for brevity but it's shorthand for a constantly renegotiated game with sounds and symbols. It's not like gravity or biology or beings or anything real in that sense.
Yet you say innocent people who have been bamboozled for decades by the MSM deserve to die in another thread. https://greatawakening.win/p/13zgJ74WiW/why-did-so-many-conservativestru/
Beginning to think your just a reddit transplant here to shill.
I don't think you can say in good faith that there's not orders of magnitude difference between experimental genetic therapy and an insider term of a specific internet nerd niche
In that other thread you say anyone who follows MSM should die. Then in this one you say we should accept what MSM states about us (calling us QAnon) because its stupid to even try and correct it.
Take your sanctimonious blathering elsewhere.
Obviously listens=about surrendering your genetic integrity, not listen = hears words and gives them thought
There is no QAnon.
There is Q.
Then there are Anons.
Ask Q, he said it.
https://qposts.online/post/4881