u/CuomoisaMassMurderer and I, the two most active mods at c/Christianity, are available to discuss these charges, we always enjoy this kind of external thread. Did you want to provide sources?
The mod board decided to delete your post because it was presented as a disruptive personal attack. On GAW the same reportable rule is stated as "respect other readers", but we haven't decided on reporting this thread, and would likely make such a decision in agreement.
A moderator banned user Andy_Man45 - 3 days with reason: Stop acting a fool. Disruption of the community is not the purpose. We should expect your hormonal balance to have your feathers ruffled for 3 days, during which you'd need a baby
If u/Andy_Man45's post is a "disruptive personal attack," which mod had the idea of responding to him with a personal attack too?
Edit: I am personally quite lenient with these so-called "personal attacks," I believe freedom of speech should trump people's feelings. I think Andy_Man45's post shouldn't have been deleted, and I am fine with the ban message. I am just saying, if the moderators didn't want personal attacks, they should refrain from giving personal attacks themselves.
Thank you for pointing that out. The first answer I can give you is that it's obviously a moderator who forgot about the ban reason appearing in the public log.
This would be a good point, out of respect for decorum and due process, to give the mod board a decent moment to evaluate the evidence presented before a secondary answer is provided.
u/CuomoisaMassMurderer and I, the two most active mods at c/Christianity, are available to discuss these charges, we always enjoy this kind of external thread. Did you want to provide sources?
Why did you delete my post?
The mod board decided to delete your post because it was presented as a disruptive personal attack. On GAW the same reportable rule is stated as "respect other readers", but we haven't decided on reporting this thread, and would likely make such a decision in agreement.
Why didn't you contact us privately with the same concern, a subject all 3 of us and others were just talking about in a related situation? https://communities.win/send?user=c:Christianity
"Do not entertain an accusation against an elder unless it is brought by two or three witnesses" (1 Tim. 5:19 KJV). Might that apply?
I found this in c/Christianity/logs
If u/Andy_Man45's post is a "disruptive personal attack," which mod had the idea of responding to him with a personal attack too?
Edit: I am personally quite lenient with these so-called "personal attacks," I believe freedom of speech should trump people's feelings. I think Andy_Man45's post shouldn't have been deleted, and I am fine with the ban message. I am just saying, if the moderators didn't want personal attacks, they should refrain from giving personal attacks themselves.
Thank you for pointing that out. The first answer I can give you is that it's obviously a moderator who forgot about the ban reason appearing in the public log.
This would be a good point, out of respect for decorum and due process, to give the mod board a decent moment to evaluate the evidence presented before a secondary answer is provided.