It's obvious and companies mandating it would be liable. They are not medical practitioners, nor are they insured, or have any grounds for firing people not taking it. This is called coercion. Coercion is a crime. They have dug themselves a hole.
If BIden is actually planning on doing this, I believe companies are being set up to be destroyed.
I've never seen this in any company or ever heard of this. Flu shot have always been voluntary. Only students have mandatory vaxx. However, there is religious and philosophical belief exemptions in all States except for CA, NY, WV, and MS.
A lot of hospitals mandate it but they make it a choice for most shots, usually only mandating flu shots. And they do offer religious and medical exemptions, if one can get it, but that's still coercion by definition, right?
I got written up for not taking the flu shot at my workplace but now that I'm hearing coercion is a crime, not to mention the Nuremberg code, how can they mandate any medical procedure? 😡
"2. When a claim is received for injury due to receipt of the COVID-19 vaccination, the claims examiner should determine if the vaccine was received prior to September 9, 2021. If the vaccination was received prior to this date, coverage is afforded only if the vaccine was administered or sponsored by the employing agency. See PM 2-0804.19.
"3. The claims examiner should then confirm that the employee is covered by the September 9, 2021 executive order. The order applies to any executive agency as defined in 5 U.S.C. 105 – agencies that fall under the executive branch of the government (excluding the Government Accountability Office). The order does not apply to employees of the United States Postal Service. If there is any question regarding applicability of the executive order, the claims examiner should query the employing agency. If the employee is not covered by the executive order, coverage is afforded only if the vaccine was administered or sponsored by the employing agency. See PM 2-0804.19.
"4. If the employee is covered by the executive order and vaccination was received on or after September 9, 2021, coverage may be afforded for (1) adverse reactions to the COVID-19 vaccination and (2) injuries sustained as the direct result of an employee receiving their mandated vaccination. Examples of such injuries include but are not limited to accidents while commuting a reasonable distance to and from the vaccination site and slip and fall injuries occurring at the vaccination site.
"5. The claims examiner should, however, ensure that the employee followed any employing agency policy with respect to obtaining their mandatory vaccination. The executive order directs each agency to implement, to the extent consistent with applicable law, a program to require COVID-19 vaccination for all of its Federal employees.
"a. If an employing agency requires employees to receive their mandatory vaccination at specific times and/or at a specific location(s), coverage is only afforded if the employee follows the agency’s vaccination policy.
"b. If any employing agency allows employees to obtain their mandatory vaccination at any time or location, coverage is afforded regardless of where or when the employee receives their vaccination, with the only limitation being for that of reasonableness."
So, the filing for compensation comes with strings attached. And ONLY applies to people who received the jab(s) AFTER Buyden's Sept 9th mandate. I guess those who got vaxxed before then are considered what...perfectly healthy? I have a feeling that loads of filings will be denied, seeing as how the Fed Govt still refuses to believe adverse events are happening. This is all smoke and mirrors, folks.
Just like student loan debt!
How many times can he sell the same bridge?
Don’t get me started on student loan debt lol
Down with interest rates. I’ll happily pay back the principal balance I took out, not a damn penny more. If only it worked like that.
It's obvious and companies mandating it would be liable. They are not medical practitioners, nor are they insured, or have any grounds for firing people not taking it. This is called coercion. Coercion is a crime. They have dug themselves a hole.
If BIden is actually planning on doing this, I believe companies are being set up to be destroyed.
If coercion is a crime how can businesses legally mandate other shots like the flu shot?
I've never seen this in any company or ever heard of this. Flu shot have always been voluntary. Only students have mandatory vaxx. However, there is religious and philosophical belief exemptions in all States except for CA, NY, WV, and MS.
A lot of hospitals mandate it but they make it a choice for most shots, usually only mandating flu shots. And they do offer religious and medical exemptions, if one can get it, but that's still coercion by definition, right?
I got written up for not taking the flu shot at my workplace but now that I'm hearing coercion is a crime, not to mention the Nuremberg code, how can they mandate any medical procedure? 😡
Agreed.
My employer mandates flu shots
Isn't Congress also excluded from the mandate?
Yes, but this relates to all the other federal employees that are being mandated per Biden's EO.
FTB:
"2. When a claim is received for injury due to receipt of the COVID-19 vaccination, the claims examiner should determine if the vaccine was received prior to September 9, 2021. If the vaccination was received prior to this date, coverage is afforded only if the vaccine was administered or sponsored by the employing agency. See PM 2-0804.19.
"3. The claims examiner should then confirm that the employee is covered by the September 9, 2021 executive order. The order applies to any executive agency as defined in 5 U.S.C. 105 – agencies that fall under the executive branch of the government (excluding the Government Accountability Office). The order does not apply to employees of the United States Postal Service. If there is any question regarding applicability of the executive order, the claims examiner should query the employing agency. If the employee is not covered by the executive order, coverage is afforded only if the vaccine was administered or sponsored by the employing agency. See PM 2-0804.19.
"4. If the employee is covered by the executive order and vaccination was received on or after September 9, 2021, coverage may be afforded for (1) adverse reactions to the COVID-19 vaccination and (2) injuries sustained as the direct result of an employee receiving their mandated vaccination. Examples of such injuries include but are not limited to accidents while commuting a reasonable distance to and from the vaccination site and slip and fall injuries occurring at the vaccination site.
"5. The claims examiner should, however, ensure that the employee followed any employing agency policy with respect to obtaining their mandatory vaccination. The executive order directs each agency to implement, to the extent consistent with applicable law, a program to require COVID-19 vaccination for all of its Federal employees.
"a. If an employing agency requires employees to receive their mandatory vaccination at specific times and/or at a specific location(s), coverage is only afforded if the employee follows the agency’s vaccination policy.
"b. If any employing agency allows employees to obtain their mandatory vaccination at any time or location, coverage is afforded regardless of where or when the employee receives their vaccination, with the only limitation being for that of reasonableness."
So, the filing for compensation comes with strings attached. And ONLY applies to people who received the jab(s) AFTER Buyden's Sept 9th mandate. I guess those who got vaxxed before then are considered what...perfectly healthy? I have a feeling that loads of filings will be denied, seeing as how the Fed Govt still refuses to believe adverse events are happening. This is all smoke and mirrors, folks.
Will make the dead ones happy I suppose?