Here's the deal with Active Duty v. Govt lawsuits: THERE. ARENT. ANY.
When we sign up to serve, there is a clear cut clause that states (I'm paraphrasing here) that the AD member and/or Family CANNOT sue the govt for injuries/death sustained from ANY action taken while in service. This includes vaccine injuries, combat injuries, training injuries/deaths etc. Even IF the chain of command is found to be at fault, we still can't sue. If that was the case we wouldn't have a military, because everyone would be suing for injuries or death sustained. If this was the case, I'd be a fucking multi millionaire for the injuries I sustained at the fault of one of my superior officer's bogus orders.
These 24 service members have no legal legs to stand on with this. This is a big, fat, dried up nothing burger. It's a freaking distraction. Don't fall for it.
They aren't sueing for an injury that had occured, they are suing for the terms the military has required to continue service.
Obviously the military can't decide to only hire or give promotions to people with a certain ethnicity or gender as that would go against civil rights and discrimination laws. The military has to stay within the law as to what it requires of its members.
"EUA products are by definition experimental and thus require the right to refuse. Under the
Nuremberg Code, the foundation of ethical medicine, no one may be coerced to participate in a
medical experiment. Consent of the individual is “absolutely essential.” A federal court held that
the U.S. military could not mandate EUA vaccines to soldiers. Doe #1 v. Rumsfeld, 297
F.Supp.2d 119 (2003). The court held: "...the United States cannot demand that members of the
armed forces also serve as guinea pigs for experimental drugs." Id. at 135. No court has ever
upheld a mandate for an EUA vaccine."
I commented on this on a different post.
Here's the deal with Active Duty v. Govt lawsuits: THERE. ARENT. ANY.
When we sign up to serve, there is a clear cut clause that states (I'm paraphrasing here) that the AD member and/or Family CANNOT sue the govt for injuries/death sustained from ANY action taken while in service. This includes vaccine injuries, combat injuries, training injuries/deaths etc. Even IF the chain of command is found to be at fault, we still can't sue. If that was the case we wouldn't have a military, because everyone would be suing for injuries or death sustained. If this was the case, I'd be a fucking multi millionaire for the injuries I sustained at the fault of one of my superior officer's bogus orders.
These 24 service members have no legal legs to stand on with this. This is a big, fat, dried up nothing burger. It's a freaking distraction. Don't fall for it.
They aren't sueing for an injury that had occured, they are suing for the terms the military has required to continue service.
Obviously the military can't decide to only hire or give promotions to people with a certain ethnicity or gender as that would go against civil rights and discrimination laws. The military has to stay within the law as to what it requires of its members.
Read this:
"EUA products are by definition experimental and thus require the right to refuse. Under the Nuremberg Code, the foundation of ethical medicine, no one may be coerced to participate in a medical experiment. Consent of the individual is “absolutely essential.” A federal court held that the U.S. military could not mandate EUA vaccines to soldiers. Doe #1 v. Rumsfeld, 297 F.Supp.2d 119 (2003). The court held: "...the United States cannot demand that members of the armed forces also serve as guinea pigs for experimental drugs." Id. at 135. No court has ever upheld a mandate for an EUA vaccine."
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/wp-content/uploads/notice-for-employers-universities-and-other-institutions-mandating-covid-19-vaccines8.31.21.pdf