A curiosity recently discovered-
CIA headquarters built by Harrison & Abramovitz: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Bush_Center_for_Intelligence
Founding members of the firm:
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Abramovitz
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wallace_Harrison
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J._Andr%C3%A9_Fouilhoux
Wallace Harrison was personal friends with Nelson Rockefeller (governor of New York) and also built the Rockefeller Center.
As I'm sure you know, all of the Rockefellers were true red communists. See: https://www.investmentwatchblog.com/erased-history-how-rockefeller-bankrolled-soviet-russia/
That is an ad hominem attack. I have spent a lot of time studying these things. I have substantial evidence to back it up. You think you know "the truth" of history and I don't. That is arrogance on top of ad hominem attack.
We live in a world where everything has been hidden. NO ONE knows the truth. The best we can do is look for evidence and present it, then debate it. The moment you think you know the truth is the moment you lose the ability to listen to the evidence.
Lol, believe what you wish. I'll share some facts with you that hopefully will help you out. I really don't give a shit about the things that you are actually doing that ARE ad hominem, unlike mine.
To be honest with you, your remarks feel like you're shilling hard for the commie luciferians and that is more offensive than anything.
I don't *believe" anything. I am an evidence based investigator. I don't ever think I've found the "Truth", I keep my eyes open to any evidence while following the path towards it.
If you had addressed specifics of what you found flawed in what I presented I could have followed up with evidence or further elaboration. Instead you simply said "you know jack shit, I will educate you on the Truth later."
That is not the path towards truth, that is the path towards promoting falsehoods, even if you believe them to be true. EVEN if they are good evidence that is still the path away from truth since it is away from debate and exploration of all the evidence.
And here you are AGAIN attempting to discredit my argument by suggesting the problem is with me. That is the definition of an ad hominem attack. If you have found what you believe to be a flaw with the argument I presented, address it specifically.
Stop using all the worst argumentative techniques and address the arguments point by point. Please.