Ok, Now I'm super confused. You basically just made my point.

Me:

Communism is a social control mechanism.

and

it may have been employed by adherents to the same perverted Natural Law religion (what you are calling Luciferianism) to control the world

and

One is the religion (the guiding belief system) of the elite, the other is the belief system of the masses

and

These two groups are completely separated by a different set of beliefs. They do not share the same beliefs at all. One set is employed by the group that adheres to the other.

You:

The goal of international communism is to enslave mankind

and

Communism occupies an integral position in the World Order's hierarchy as both the public face, and the actual raw manpower needed to get things done.

and

the World Order would have no teeth without communism.

and

Communism provides the gears of Luciferianism in society.

Do you not realize we just said the exact same thing?

I suggest you read before attempting to tell someone they are "completely ignorant about history".

Here is the short of what I said, that I'm pretty sure you just said as well:

Luciferianism is the belief systems that guide the behavior of the elite.

Communism is the belief systems the elite use to control the behavior of the masses.

What the fuck is the problem you had with what I said?

This is why its best to address arguments point by point specifically instead of attacking the argumentor, because now I am nothing but confused on what the fuck you disagreed with me about.